Vital Hevia1, Victoria Gómez2, Manuel Hevia2, Javier Lorca2, Marta Santiago2, Ana Dominguez2, Sara Álvarez2, Víctor Díez2, Cristina Gordaliza3, Francisco Javier Burgos2. 1. Urology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Ctra Colmenar km 9,100, 28034, Madrid, Spain. vital.hevia.uro@gmail.com. 2. Urology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Ctra Colmenar km 9,100, 28034, Madrid, Spain. 3. Radiology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To update the most relevant literature regarding complex cases during kidney transplant setting that recipient presents by himself, especially during implantation surgery due to vascular diseases and/or urinary tract anomalies. RECENT FINDINGS: Increasing age of donors and recipients is leading to an increased complexity of kidney transplant implantation surgery. In addition, the high peripheral vascular disease prevalence worldwide increases difficulty of surgery and decreases long-term outcomes as well. Moreover, it also increases transplant morbidity and mortality, both overall and cardiovascular, and finally clearly decreases graft survival. However, dialysis alternative has even worse outcomes in terms of mortality, with a proportional risk of death 2.66 higher compared with transplanted patients. Aorto-iliac prosthesis and 3rd and 4th transplants in occupied iliac fossae do also represent a challenging situation with a clearly increased morbidity and mortality. In some of those particular conditions, orthotopic kidney transplant technique is an alternative with good functional and survival outcomes, but not exempt of complications. Kidney transplant in vascular complex recipients has worse outcomes compared with conventional non-risky population. It remains a challenging surgical and medical procedure with higher morbidity and mortality, and decreased graft survival. However, dialysis mortality is still even greater and a transplant attempt might be justified. Orthotopic kidney transplant technique might play a role in selected patients with aorto-iliac unworkable segments or even in patients with special urinary tract conditions.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To update the most relevant literature regarding complex cases during kidney transplant setting that recipient presents by himself, especially during implantation surgery due to vascular diseases and/or urinary tract anomalies. RECENT FINDINGS: Increasing age of donors and recipients is leading to an increased complexity of kidney transplant implantation surgery. In addition, the high peripheral vascular disease prevalence worldwide increases difficulty of surgery and decreases long-term outcomes as well. Moreover, it also increases transplant morbidity and mortality, both overall and cardiovascular, and finally clearly decreases graft survival. However, dialysis alternative has even worse outcomes in terms of mortality, with a proportional risk of death 2.66 higher compared with transplanted patients. Aorto-iliac prosthesis and 3rd and 4th transplants in occupied iliac fossae do also represent a challenging situation with a clearly increased morbidity and mortality. In some of those particular conditions, orthotopic kidney transplant technique is an alternative with good functional and survival outcomes, but not exempt of complications. Kidney transplant in vascular complex recipients has worse outcomes compared with conventional non-risky population. It remains a challenging surgical and medical procedure with higher morbidity and mortality, and decreased graft survival. However, dialysis mortality is still even greater and a transplant attempt might be justified. Orthotopic kidney transplant technique might play a role in selected patients with aorto-iliac unworkable segments or even in patients with special urinary tract conditions.
Authors: F Cofan; I Nuñez; R Gilabert; D Zambon; E Ros; M Cofan; S Muray; E Mansilla; C Bru; F Oppenheimer Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 2001 Feb-Mar Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: P Horvath; I Capobianco; J Rolinger; A Königsrainer; S Nadalin; I Königsrainer Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 2017 Jul - Aug Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: Diana A Wu; Matthew L Robb; John L R Forsythe; Clare Bradley; John Cairns; Heather Draper; Christopher Dudley; Rachel J Johnson; Wendy Metcalfe; Rommel Ravanan; Paul Roderick; Charles R V Tomson; Christopher J E Watson; J Andrew Bradley; Gabriel C Oniscu Journal: Transplantation Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Eduardo Mazzucchi; Alexandre Danilovic; Ioannis Michel Antonopoulos; Afonso Celso Piovesan; William Carlos Nahas; Antonio Marmo Lucon; Miguel Srougi Journal: Transplantation Date: 2006-03-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: L Izquierdo; L Peri; M Piqueras; I Revuelta; R Alvarez-Vijande; M Musquera; F Oppenheimer; A Alcaraz Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: L S S Ooms; J I Roodnat; F J M F Dor; T C K Tran; H J A N Kimenai; J N M Ijzermans; T Terkivatan Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2015-07-07 Impact factor: 8.086