Literature DB >> 32019733

Epidemiology of pelvic and acetabular fractures in France.

Elias Melhem1, Guillaume Riouallon2, Khalil Habboubi1, Mehdi Gabbas3, Pomme Jouffroy1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Acetabular and pelvic fracture accounts for 1.5% of fractures in adults and 2-5% of fractures requiring hospital admission. Several national-level epidemiological studies have been conducted outside France, but French national data are not known. We therefore assessed all patients admitted for acetabular or pelvic fracture in France between 2006 and 2016. The study objectives were: 1) to determine incidence of acetabular and pelvic fracture, 2) to determine progression in incidence between 2006 and 2016, and 3) to determine progression in treatment. HYPOTHESIS: Incidence of acetabular and pelvic fracture in France is increasing.
METHODS: The following data for the period 2006-2016 were collated from the French national health insurance (CPAM: Caisse Primaire d'Assurance Maladie) database: gender, age, type of treatment, and geographical distribution by administrative area (Département). Two-tailed Student tests were used for comparison of means for numerical variables between independent samples; linear regression was used to analyze correlations; and the Chi2 test was used to compare percentages of categoric variables.
RESULTS: There were 32,614 acetabular and 164,694 pelvic fractures, with male predominance for the acetabulum and female predominance for the pelvis. Mean age at acetabular fracture was 66±22 years (range, 1-108 years), and 74±20 years (range, 1-112 years) for pelvic fracture. The rate of acetabular fracture increased to 3,301 in 2016 from 2,316 in 2006, with a strong increase in the rate of pelvic fracture, to 18,902 in 2016 from 10,806 in 2006. Incidence of acetabular fracture per 100,000 increased from 3.67 in 2006 to 4.95 in 2016, and from 17.06 to 23.18 in over-75 year-olds. Incidence of pelvic fracture per 100,000 increased from 17.1 to 28.33, and from 129.30 to 210.69 in over-75 year-olds. Linear regression predicts incidence per 100,000 of 5.9 for acetabular fracture and of 41 for pelvic fracture by 2030 in young subjects and 32 and 309 respectively in over-75 year-olds. Management was surgical for acetabular fracture in 12.31% of cases in 2006 and in 14.33% in 2016, and in 1.43% and 2.16% respectively for pelvic fracture. DISCUSSION: The present data agree with previous reports, with strong increase in incidence of fracture in young and especially in elderly subjects. In elderly subjects, such fractures may require surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective study without control group.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetabular fracture; Elderly; Epidemiology; Pelvic fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32019733     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.11.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  15 in total

1.  Complications after surgical treatment of acetabular fractures: a 5-year follow-up of 229 patients.

Authors:  Natalie Lundin; Hans E Berg; Anders Enocson
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-05-20

2.  Complications after surgical treatment of pelvic fractures: a five-year follow-up of 194 patients.

Authors:  Natalie Lundin; Anders Enocson
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-02-10

3.  Fracture lines and comminution zones in acetabular fractures based on three dimensional computed tomography.

Authors:  Sinan Oguzkaya; Turan Bilge Kizkapan; Ali Eray Gunay; Abdulhamit Misir
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-08-02

4.  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3D Printing Technology for the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures.

Authors:  Jin Cao; Huanye Zhu; Chao Gao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Feasibility of Imaging-Based 3-Dimensional Models to Design Patient-Specific Osteosynthesis Plates and Drilling Guides.

Authors:  Frank F A IJpma; Anne M L Meesters; Bram B J Merema; Kaj Ten Duis; Jean-Paul P M de Vries; Hester Banierink; Klaus W Wendt; Joep Kraeima; Max J H Witjes
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-02-01

6.  Minimizing misclassification bias with a model to identify acetabular fractures using health administrative data: A cohort study.

Authors:  Andrew Adamczyk; George Grammatopoulos; Carl van Walraven
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Anterior intrapelvic approach and suprapectineal quadrilateral surface plate for acetabular fractures with anterior involvement: a retrospective study of 34 patients.

Authors:  Gianluca Ciolli; Domenico De Mauro; Giuseppe Rovere; Amarildo Smakaj; Silvia Marino; Lorenzo Are; Omar El Ezzo; Francesco Liuzza
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Epidemiological Characteristics of Major Joints Fracture-Dislocations.

Authors:  Wei-Guang Zhao; Jiang-Tao Ma; Xiao-Li Yan; Yan-Bin Zhu; Ying-Ze Zhang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 2.071

9.  Differences in fixation to young and elderly quadrilateral surfaces with anatomic quadrilateral surface plate (AQSP) based on cortical thickness morphological results.

Authors:  Jialiang Guo; Weichong Dong; Yali Zhou; Jinglue Hu; Pengyu Ye; Wei Chen; Yingze Zhang; Zhiyong Hou
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Differences in Accuracy and Radiation Dose in Placement of Iliosacral Screws: Comparison between 3D and 2D Fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Michał Kułakowski; Paweł Reichert; Karol Elster; Jarosław Witkowski; Paweł Ślęczka; Piotr Morasiewicz; Łukasz Oleksy; Aleksandra Królikowska
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.