| Literature DB >> 32019702 |
Sarah-Blythe Ballard1, Aaron Tallant2, Rosio G Guerra3, Dawn Quigley4, Regan Stiegmann5, Andrew J Mirelman6, Mark S Riddle7, Robert H Gilman8.
Abstract
Vaccine implementation planning in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) often focuses on children without considering special adult populations. We adapted an economic model developed by the United States Department of Defense (DoD) to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of vaccine acquisition strategies for Campylobacter-, ETEC-, Shigella-, and norovirus-associated gastroenteritis. We compared implementation costs with current medical management in the Peruvian armed forces, a special population of low- and middle-income (LMIC) adults with a high incidence of infectious gastroenteritis. Pathogen-specific vaccine implementation resulted in calculated cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) per duty day lost averted (CERDDL) of $13,741; $1,272; $301; and $803, and a CER per diarrhea day averted of $2,130; $215; $51; and $199 for Campylobacter, ETEC, Shigella, and norovirus, respectively. These estimates compare favorably to CERDDL estimates from high-income military population and suggest that implementing vaccines gastroenteritis may be cost-effective in the Peruvian military population. Published by Elsevier Ltd.Entities:
Keywords: Cost-effectiveness analysis; Gastroenteritis; Low- and middle-income countries; Military; Peru; Vaccine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32019702 PMCID: PMC9423028 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.01.075
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vaccine ISSN: 0264-410X Impact factor: 4.169