| Literature DB >> 32019285 |
Guolin Zhang1,2, Xin Luo1,2, Wei Zhang1,2, Engeng Chen1,2, Jianbin Xu2, Fei Wang1, Gaoyang Cao1, Zhenyu Ju3, Dongai Jin1, Xuefeng Huang1,2, Wei Zhou1, Zhangfa Song1,2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: 5-Fluorouracil (5-Fu) is used as a conventional chemotherapy drug in chemotherapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer, but many patients still suffer from treatment failure due to 5-Fu resistance. Emerging observations revealed the important role of chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 13 (CXCL-13) in tumor microenvironment and its relationship with prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer. This study is designed to reveal the important role of CXCL-13 in causing colorectal cancer resistance to 5-Fu.Entities:
Keywords: 5-Fluorouracil; CXCL13; Chemokines; Colorectal neoplasms; Drug resistance
Year: 2019 PMID: 32019285 PMCID: PMC7176956 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2019.593
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Res Treat ISSN: 1598-2998 Impact factor: 4.679
Fig. 1.Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 13 (CXCL-13) is elevated in 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu) resistant (5-FuR) colorectal cancer cells. (A, B) Viability of DLD-1 and DLD-1 5-FuR cells, HCT116, and HCT116 5-FuR cells treated with different concentrations of 5-Fu for 3 days. (C, D) Viability of DLD-1 cells or HCT116 cells treated with different concentrations of 5-Fu for 3 days after pretreatment with DLD-1 5-FuR or HCT116 5-FuR cells conditioned medium (CM) for 2 days. (E) Semi-quantitative of cytokine arrays analysis of expression levels of different cytokines measured in the CM of paired DLD-1 and DLD-1 5-FuR cells. (F, G) Box-plot showing the CXCL-13 expression level in colorectal cancer parental cells (DLD-1, HCT116) and 5-FuR cells (DLD-1 5-FuR, HCT116 5-FuR). Data from three independent experiments were tested in triplicate. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 by Student’s t test.
Patient characteristics of 5-Fu–sensitive or –resistant set
| Patient | Age (yr) | Sex | Stage | Histology | Chemotherapy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1893 | 55 | M | IIIIA | Adenocarcinoma | 5-Fu+oxaliplatin |
| P2338 | 66 | M | IIIIB | Adenocarcinoma | 5-Fu+irinotecan+oxaliplatin+cetuximab |
| P2653 | 65 | M | IIIC | Adenocarcinoma | 5-Fu+irinotecan+oxaliplatin+cetuximab |
| P1699 | 78 | F | IIIIA | Mucus adenocarcinoma | 5-Fu+oxaliplatin+bevacizumab |
| P1822 | 76 | M | IIIIB | Adenocarcinoma | 5-Fu+irinotecan+oxaliplatin+bevacizumab |
| P2167 | 66 | M | IIIIA | Adenocarcinoma | 5-Fu+irinotecan+oxaliplatin+bevacizumab |
| P2357 | 70 | M | IIIB | Adenocarcinoma | 5-Fu+irinotecan+bevacizumab |
| P1692 | 61 | F | IIIIA | Adenocarcinoma | 5-Fu+irinotecan+oxaliplatin+bevacizumab |
| P1804 | 21 | F | IIIC | Mucus adenocarcinoma | 5-Fu+irinotecan+oxaliplatin |
| P1631 | 66 | M | IIIIA | Adenocarcinoma | 5-Fu+irinotecan+oxaliplatin+bevacizumab |
| P2132 | 55 | M | IIIIB | Adenocarcinoma | 5-Fu+irinotecan+oxaliplatin+bevacizumab |
| P2286 | 59 | M | IIIIA | Adenocarcinoma | 5-Fu+irinotecan+oxaliplatin+cetuximab+bevacizumab |
| P1957 | 55 | M | IIIIB | Adenocarcinoma | 5-Fu+irinotecan+oxaliplatin+cetuximab |
| P2186 | 65 | M | IIIC | Adenocarcinoma | 5-Fu+irinotecan+oxaliplatin |
| P2295 | 48 | M | IIIC | Adenocarcinoma | 5-Fu+irinotecan+oxaliplatin+bevacizumab |
| P1863 | 47 | F | IIIIB | Mucus adenocarcinoma | 5-Fu+irinotecan+oxaliplatin+bevacizumab |
| P1977 | 51 | F | IIIIB | Adenocarcinoma | 5-Fu+irinotecan+oxaliplatin+bevacizumab |
| P2180 | 53 | F | IIIIB | Adenocarcinoma | 5-Fu+oxaliplatin |
5-Fu, 5-fluorouracil.
Fig. 2.Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 13 (CXCL-13) is elevated in 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu) resistant colorectal cancer patient and predicts clinical outcomes. (A) Comparison of the levels of CXCL-13 protein were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 5-Fu–sensitive (n=9) and –resistant (n=9) colorectal cancer patients, patients are shown in Table 1. Sen, sensitive cases; Res, resistant cases. (B) 6-Year overall survival (OS) Kaplan–Meier survival curves grouped by serum CXCL-13 expression levels (118 pg/mL) of 64 colorectal cancer patients, as patient information is shown in Table 2. (C) Six-year disease-free survival (DFS) Kaplan–Meier survival curves grouped by serum CXCL-13 expression levels (118 pg/mL) of 64 colorectal cancer patients, as patient information is shown in Table 2. (A) *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 by unpaired Student’s t test. (B, C) *p < 0.05 by log-rank (Mantel-Cox), hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) are shown.
Correlation between patient serum CXCL-13 level and clinical characteristics of ELISA set
| Characteristic | Total | Serum CXCL-13 level, n (%) | OR | 95% CI | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 118 pg/mL | ≥ 118 pg/mL | |||||
| 64 | 25 (39.0) | 39 (61.0) | - | - | - | |
| ≥ 65 | 41 | 15 (36.6) | 26 (63.4) | |||
| < 65 | 23 | 10 (43.5) | 13 (56.5) | 1.333 | 0.481-3.579 | 0.605 |
| Male | 34 | 11 (32.4) | 23 (67.6) | |||
| Female | 30 | 14 (46.7) | 16 (53.3) | 1.830 | 0.635-4.845 | 0.308 |
| IIIA | 6 | 1 (16.7) | 5 (83.8) | |||
| IIIB | 49 | 23 (46.9) | 26 (53.1) | |||
| IIIC | 4 | 1 (25.0) | 3 (75.0) | |||
| IIIIA | 3 | 0 | 3 (100) | |||
| IIIIB | 2 | 0 | 2 (100) | - | - | 0.193 |
| Adenocarcinoma | 51 | 20 (39.2) | 31 (60.8) | |||
| Mucus adenocarcinoma | 11 | 5 (45.5) | 6 (54.5) | |||
| Others | 2 | 0 | 2 (100) | - | - | 0.479 |
p-value calculated by chi-square test. CXCL-13, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 13; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Fig. 3.Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 13 (CXCL-13) promotes colorectal cancer cells resistance to 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu) through autocrine mechanism. (A, B) Viability of DLD-1 cells or HCT116 cells treated with different concentrations of 5-Fu for 3 days after pretreatment with 10 ng/mL of CXCL-13 for 6 hours. (C, D) Viability of DLD-1 5-Fu resistant (5-FuR) cells or HCT116 5-FuR cells treated with different concentrations of 5-Fu for 3 days after pretreatment with a control IgG or a CXCL-13 neutralizing antibody (5 μg/mL) for 6 hours. Data from three independent experiments were tested in triplicate. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 by Student’s t test or one-way ANOVA.
Fig. 4.Knockdown of chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 13 (CXCL-13) overcomes 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu) resistance (5-FuR) in colorectal cancer cells. (A) Box-plot showing the CXCL-13 expression level in DLD-1 5-FuR cells or HCT116 5-FuR cells, DLD-1 5-FuR or HCT116 5-FuR siCXCL-13 cells (30 pg/mL for siCXCL-13). (B, C) Viability of DLD-1 5-FuR cells or HCT116 5-FuR cells, DLD-1 5-FuR or HCT116 5-FuR siCXCL-13 cells (30 pg/mL for siCXCL-13) and recombinant CXCL-13 (10 ng/mL) reversed the effect of CXCL-13 siRNA on the sensitivity of DLD-1 5-FuR cells or HCT116 5-FuR cells treated with different concentrations of 5-Fu for 3 days after pretreatment with CXCL-13 siRNA. (D) The 5-Fu concentration of 50% inhibition of cell growth (IC50) of six cells in B and C above. Data from three independent experiments were tested in triplicate. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 by Student’s t test or one-way ANOVA.
Fig. 5.5-Fluorouracil (5-Fu) treatment induces chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 13 (CXCL-13) secretion in vivo. (A) A simple schematic of the experimental process. (B) Line chart showing the serum CXCL-13 expression level in mice bearing patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDX) tumors and treated with vehicle or 5-Fu (30 mg/kg/twice a week for 4 weeks) as in A. (C) Representative H&E, immunohistochemistry (IHC) images of subcutaneous tumors formed by PDX tumors treated as in A. (D) Quantification of IHC staining for CXCL-13 of subcutaneous tumors formed by PDX tumors treated as in A. ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Data are represented as mean±standard deviation. n=3 mice/group while n=6 tumors/group. **p < 0.01 by Student’s t test or two-way ANOVA.