| Literature DB >> 32019178 |
Oriele Palumbo1, Jessica Manzi1, Daniele Meggiolaro2, Francesco M Vitucci1, Francesco Trequattrini1,3, Mariangela Curcio4, Annalisa Paolone1, Sergio Brutti5.
Abstract
Transition metal substitution is a key stratEntities:
Keywords: X-ray absorption; X-ray diffraction; cathode materials; olivine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32019178 PMCID: PMC7037934 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25030601
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Of the octahedral unit cell of the olivine lattice (green octahedra: LiO6 units, blue octahedra: TMO6 octahedra, pink tetrahedra: PO4 units, TM = transition metals). Red full circles are oxygen atoms, green full circles are lithium atoms, blu full circles are TM atoms.
Figure 2Patterns of the substituted samples before and after annealing under Ar. LiCoPO4 pattern is also reported as a reference.
Coding and estimated stoichiometries.
| Sample Coding | Tann Under Ar Flow | Li:Co:Mn:Ni | CoSO4:Mn(Ni)SO4 Molar Ratio | Experimental Stoichiometry |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.933:1.001:0.104:0 | 9.0:1.0 | Li0.89(Co0.9Mn0.1)1.04PO4 | |
|
| 700 °C | 0.936:1.002:0.105:0 | 9.2:1.0 | Li0.89(Co0.9Mn0.1)1.04PO4 |
|
| 1.055:0.933:0:0.096 | 9.0:1.0 | Li1.02(Co0.9Ni0.1)0.99PO4 | |
|
| 700 °C | 1.051:0.941:0:0.099 | 8.9:1.0 | Li1.01(Co0.9Ni0.1)1.00PO4 |
Rietveld Refinement results for all samples. Errors on the last digit of the cell volume are reported in parenthesis (Occ. stands for occupancy factor, vac stands for unoccupied/vacant sites).
| Stoichiometry and Vacancy Occupation Factor on the (4a) Wycoff Site | Cell Volume Å3 | Cell Parameters Å | Antisite Disorder Occupancy (4a/4c) | wRp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Li0.89 (Co0.9Mn0.1)1.04PO4 | 286.1 (2) | a = 10.232 (1) | 0.046 | 0.0489 |
|
| ||||
| Li0.89(Co0.9Mn0.1)1.04PO4 | 287.6 (1) | a = 10.250 (1) | 0.048 | 0.0422 |
|
| ||||
| Li1.01(Co0.9Ni0.1)0.99PO4 | 286.2 (1) | a = 10.230 (1) | 0.06 | 0.0503 |
|
| ||||
| Li1.01(Co0.9Ni0.1)0.99PO4 | 285.2 (1) | a = 10.212 (1) | 0.045 | 0.0495 |
| LiCoPO4 | 284.3 (4) | a = 10.207 (3) | 0.006 | 0.0250 |
Distances (Å, estimated mean uncertainty ±0.01Å) and degeneracies (in parentheses) calculated from structural refinements of the XRD data.
| LCmP | LCmP@Ar | LCnP | LCnP@Ar | LCP [ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| 2.08 (x2) | 2.08 (x2) | 2.11 (x2) | 2.13 (x2) | 2.06 (x2) |
| 2.08 | 2.05 | 2.05 | 2.05 | 2.09 |
| 2.08 | 2.14 | 2.21 | 2.16 | 2.17 |
| 2.21 (x2) | 2.21 (x2) | 2.23 (x2) | 2.18 (x2) | 2.20 (x2) |
|
| ||||
| 2.12 | 2.13 | 2.16 | 2.14 | 2.13 |
|
| ||||
| 2.77 | 2.79 | 2.78 | 2.76 | 2.79 |
|
| ||||
| 3.22 | 3.22 | 3.22 | 3.20 | 3.21 |
Figure 3XANES spectra of (a) LCmP and LCmP@Ar at the Co K-edge, (b)LCnP and LCnP@Ar at the Co K-edge, (c) LCmP and LCmP@Ar at the Mn K-edge, (d)LCnP and LCnP@Ar at the Ni K-edge. In the insets, the pre-edge regions are shown.
Figure 4Radial distribution functions obtained after the Fourier transformation of k3χ(k): (a) Co-edge and (b) Mn-edge of LCmP and LCmP@Ar samples; (c) Co-edge and (d) Ni-edge of the LCnP and LCnP@Ar samples. In the case of the Co edges a reference radial distribution function is shown corresponding to the undoped LiCoPO4 lattice [14].
Figure 5Points and best-fit line for the BFT of the k3-weighted Co and Mn K-edge signal for samples LCmP and LCmP@Ar.
Figure 6Points and best-fit line for the BFT of the k3-weighted Co and Ni K-edge signal for samples LCnP and LCnP@Ar.
Between scattering atoms in Å obtained by best fit for LCmP based samples. CN is the coordination number, M-Z represents the central absorber (M, that is Co or Mn respectively in the Co K-edge and the Mn K-edge fits) and the scattering atom (Z, that is O, P/O or Co/Mn in the three shells considered). Statistical errors on distances are in all cases smaller than 0.01 Å.
| Shell | M-Z | C-N | Co K-edge | Mn K-edge | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCmP | LCmP@Ar | LCmP | LCmP@Ar | |||
| M-O | 2 | 1.90 | 1.96 | 1.94 | 1.93 | |
|
| M-O | 2 | 2.01 | 2.06 | 2.05 | 2.04 |
| M-O | 2 | 2.16 | 2.18 | 2.22 | 2.19 | |
| M-P | 1 | 2.81 | 2.82 | 2.83 | 2.90 | |
|
| M-P | 4 | 3.26 | 3.29 | 3.27 | 3.28 |
| M-O | 6 | 3.57 | 3.39 | 3.63 | 3.59 | |
| M-M’ | 4 | 3.88 | 3.84 | 3.80 | 3.81 | |
|
| M-M’ | 2 | 4.76 | 4.74 | 4.63 | 4.42 |
|
| 4.9 | 7.9 | 4.8 | 9.7 | ||
Between scattering atoms in Å obtained by best fit for LCnP based samples. C-N is the coordination number. M-Z represents the central absorber (M, that is Co or Ni respectively in the Co K-edge and the Ni K-edge fits) and the scattering atom (Z, that is O, P/O or Co/Ni in the three shells considered). Statistical errors on distances are in all cases smaller than 0.01 Å.
| Shell | M-Z | C-N | Co K-edge | Ni K-edge | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCnP | LCnP@Ar | LCnP | LCnP@Ar | |||
| M-O | 2 | 1.91 | 1.84 | 1.86 | 1.97 | |
|
| M-O | 2 | 2.01 | 2.01 | 2.00 | 2.05 |
| M-O | 2 | 2.16 | 2.17 | 2.15 | 2.14 | |
| M-P | 1 | 2.86 | 2.84 | 2.84 | 2.77 | |
|
| M-P | 4 | 3.27 | 3.27 | 3.29 | 3.20 |
| M-O | 6 | 3.53 | 3.56 | 3.34 | 3.63 | |
| M-M’ | 4 | 3.84 | 3.87 | 3.97 | 3.80 | |
|
| M-M’ | 2 | 4.71 | 4.75 | 4.86 | 4.72 |
|
| 3.9 | 5.9 | 8.6 | 16.8 | ||
Figure 7Cell voltage profile in galvanostatic conditions of the (a) Ni- substituted and (b) Mn-substituted samples before and after the annealing under Ar.
Figure 8Ions diffusion path along the (010) lattice direction of the olivine phase. The shown O1, O2 and O3 oxygen atoms (4c/4c/8d lattice sites, respectively) are the closest first neighbors of the Li-centres (4a lattice site) and limit the size of the diffusion channel.