| Literature DB >> 32019144 |
Eloy Pena-Rodríguez1, Mari Carmen Moreno1, Bárbara Blanco-Fernandez1, Jordi González1, Francisco Fernández-Campos1.
Abstract
The alteration of retinoids levels in the skin can cause different disorders in the maturation of epithelial skin cells. Topical administration of these lipophilic molecules is a challenge that can be addressed by encapsulation into drug delivery systems. In this study, retinyl palmitate transferosomes formulated in cream were developed and the increases in the penetration of the active ingredients as well as the biodistribution were evaluated in vitro and in vivo. Transfersomes demonstrated a significant increase in the administration of retinyl palmitate to the epidermis by quantification of the active ingredients in the different layers of the skin, as well as by fluorescence microscopy of biopsies of non-dermatomized pig-ear skin. These results suggest that transfersomes may be an efficient vehicle for the delivery of retinoids to inner layers of the skin, such as the epidermis.Entities:
Keywords: biodistribution; drug release; penetration; retinyl palmitate; skin; transfersomes
Year: 2020 PMID: 32019144 PMCID: PMC7076369 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12020112
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
Transfersome physical chemical parameters, measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS) and HPLC. Assay (%) refers to the HPLC retinyl palmitate (RP) quantification assay respect to the nominal value of RP (1.1% w/w).
| Sample | Hydrodynamic Diameter (nm) | PDI | Z-Potential (mv) | Assay (%) | EE (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfersomes | 300.5 ± 10.9 | 0.471 ± 0.020 | −9.48 ± 1.50 | 102.63 ± 0.51 | 100 ± 0 |
Figure 1Transmission electron microscopy pictures of negative-stained transfersomes with uranyl acetate.
Figure 2Stability studies at 25 ± 2 °C/60% ± 5% Relative Humidity (HR) over 18 months. RP-loaded transfersomes’ hydrodynamic diameter and polydispersity index, monitored over time.
Figure 3Stability studies at 40 ± 2 °C/75% ± 5% HR for six months. RP-loaded transfersomes’ hydrodynamic diameter and polydispersity index, monitored over time.
Transfersome stability regression slopes.
| Condition | 25 °C/60% HR | 40 °C/75% HR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response | Hydrodynamic Diameter | PDI | Hydrodynamic Diameter (nm) | PDI |
| Slope | 0.761 | −0.002 | 8.000 | −0.012 |
| 0.231 | 0.277 | 0.546 | 0.275 | |
Transfersomes’ diameter, polydispersion index (PDI) and deformability index.
| Sample | Hydrodynamic Diameter (nm) | PDI | Deformability Index |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transfersomes | 300.5 ± 10.9 | 0.471 ± 0.020 | 8.12 |
| Extruded Transfersomes | 285.5 ± 9.7 | 0.247 ± 0.014 |
Physio-chemical parameters of transfersome and non-transfersome cream formulations.
| Sample | Appearance | pH | Viscosity (cP) | Assay (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NT Cream | White-yellowish cream | 4.86 | 64.70 ± 0.18 | 98.07 ± 0.68 |
| T Cream | White-yellowish cream | 4.81 | 100.15 ± 2.35 | 96.87 ± 0.72 |
RP-released percentage through a synthetic membrane from a transfersome formulation.
| Time (h) | Mean RP Released (%) | Standard Deviation (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0.36 | 0.57 |
| 24 | 6.81 | 6.19 |
| 30 | 7.64 | 6.61 |
Figure 4Black bar shows the free retinyl palmitate penetration. The black stripped bars show the RP penetration from transfersomes.
Figure 5Black bar shows the RP penetration from Non-transfersome (NT) emulsion. The black stripped bars show the RP penetration from T emulsion.
Figure 6Fluorescence microscopy images of pig-ear skin cross-section. Red color corresponds to Nile red fluorescence and blue to Hoeschst staining of the cell nucleus. (a) Not vehiculized nile red control (image J, mean epidermis intensity 7846 ± 140 AU); (b) Nile red-marked transfersomes (image J, mean epidermis intensity 12,428 ± 254 AU). The images were captured using 10× magnifications
Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) average measures before and after the application of L and NT creams, as well as p value of the comparation between the ratio and 1 before and after application.
| Time 0 h TEWL (g/m2 h) | Standard Deviation (g/m2 h) | Time 2 h after Application TWEL (g/m2 h) | Standard Deviation (g/m2 h) | Ratio TWEL 2 h/0 h | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.17 | 1.25 | 10.63 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.388 |