Literature DB >> 32017598

Velocity-based resistance training: impact of velocity loss in the set on neuromuscular performance and hormonal response.

David Rodríguez-Rosell1,2, Juan Manuel Yáñez-García1,2, Ricardo Mora-Custodio1,2, Fernando Pareja-Blanco1,2, Antonio G Ravelo-García3, Juan Ribas-Serna4, Juan José González-Badillo1.   

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the effects of 2 resistance training (RT) programs with different velocity losses (VLs) allowed in each set: 10% (VL10%) versus 30% (VL30%) on neuromuscular performance and hormonal response. Twenty-five young healthy males were randomly assigned into 2 groups: VL10% (n = 12) or VL30% (n = 13). Subjects followed a velocity-based RT program for 8 weeks (2 sessions per week) using only the full-squat (SQ) exercise at 70%-85% 1-repetition maximum (1RM). Repetition velocity was recorded in all training sessions. A 20-m running sprint, countermovement jump (CMJ), 1RM, muscle endurance, and electromyogram (EMG) during SQ exercise and resting hormonal concentrations were assessed before and after the RT program. Both groups showed similar improvements in muscle strength and endurance variables (VL10%: 7.0%-74.8%; VL30%: 4.2%-73.2%). The VL10% resulted in greater percentage increments in CMJ (9.2% vs. 5.4%) and sprint performance (-1.5% vs. 0.4%) than VL30%, despite VL10% performing less than half of the repetitions than VL30% during RT. In addition, only VL10% showed slight increments in EMG variables, whereas no significant changes in resting hormonal concentrations were observed. Therefore, our results suggest that velocity losses in the set as low as 10% are enough to achieve significant improvements in neuromuscular performance, which means greater efficiency during RT. Novelty The VL10% group showed similar or even greater percentage of changes in physical performance compared with VL30%. No significant changes in resting hormonal concentrations were observed for any training group. Curvilinear relationships between percentage VL in the set and changes in strength and CMJ performance were observed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EMG; accroupissement complet; adaptations musculaires; endocrine response; entraînement en résistance; force musculaire; full squat; muscle adaptations; muscle strength; performance physique; physical performance; resistance training; réponse endocrinienne

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32017598     DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2019-0829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab        ISSN: 1715-5312            Impact factor:   2.665


  14 in total

1.  The Acute and Chronic Effects of Implementing Velocity Loss Thresholds During Resistance Training: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Critical Evaluation of the Literature.

Authors:  Ivan Jukic; Alejandro Pérez Castilla; Amador García Ramos; Bas Van Hooren; Michael R McGuigan; Eric R Helms
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 11.928

2.  The impact of resistance exercise range of motion on the magnitude of upper-body post-activation performance enhancement.

Authors:  Michał Krzysztofik; Robert Trybulski; Bartosz Trąbka; Dawid Perenc; Konrad Łuszcz; Adam Zajac; Dan Iulian Alexe; Tatiana Dobrescu; Cristina Elena Moraru
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-07-07

Review 3.  Methods for Controlling and Reporting Resistance Training Proximity to Failure: Current Issues and Future Directions.

Authors:  Joshua C Pelland; Zac P Robinson; Jacob F Remmert; Rebecca M Cerminaro; Brian Benitez; Thomas A John; Eric R Helms; Michael C Zourdos
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 11.928

4.  Effects of subjective and objective autoregulation methods for intensity and volume on enhancing maximal strength during resistance-training interventions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stian Larsen; Eirik Kristiansen; Roland van den Tillaar
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Differences between adjusted vs. non-adjusted loads in velocity-based training: consequences for strength training control and programming.

Authors:  Pedro Jiménez-Reyes; Adrian Castaño-Zambudio; Víctor Cuadrado-Peñafiel; Jorge M González-Hernández; Fernando Capelo-Ramírez; Luis M Martínez-Aranda; Juan J González-Badillo
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  The "Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology" Journal Club Series: Resistance Training.

Authors:  Antonio Paoli; Tatiana Moro; Silvio Lorenzetti; Jan Seiler; Fabian Lüthy; Micah Gross; Federico Roggio; Helmi Chaabene; Giuseppe Musumeci
Journal:  J Funct Morphol Kinesiol       Date:  2020-04-02

7.  The Effect of Load and Volume Autoregulation on Muscular Strength and Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Landyn M Hickmott; Philip D Chilibeck; Keely A Shaw; Scotty J Butcher
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2022-01-15

8.  Effects of velocity based training vs. traditional 1RM percentage-based training on improving strength, jump, linear sprint and change of direction speed performance: A Systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kai-Fang Liao; Xin-Xin Wang; Meng-Yuan Han; Lin-Long Li; George P Nassis; Yong-Ming Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Novel Resistance Training Approach to Monitoring the Volume in Older Adults: The Role of Movement Velocity.

Authors:  Diogo L Marques; Henrique P Neiva; Daniel A Marinho; Mário C Marques
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  Velocity-Based Resistance Training on 1-RM, Jump and Sprint Performance: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Mateo Baena-Marín; Andrés Rojas-Jaramillo; Jhonatan González-Santamaría; David Rodríguez-Rosell; Jorge L Petro; Richard B Kreider; Diego A Bonilla
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.