| Literature DB >> 32017088 |
Wayne M Koster1, David R Dawson1, Adrian Kitchingman1, Paul D Moloney1, Robin Hale1.
Abstract
The construction of dams and weirs, and associated changes to hydrological and hydraulic (e.g., water level and velocity) characteristics of rivers is a key environmental threat for fish. These multiple stressors potentially can affect fish in a variety of ways, including by causing changes in their movement, habitat use and activity. Understanding how and why these changes occur can inform management efforts to ameliorate these threats. In this context, we used acoustic telemetry to examine habitat use, longitudinal movement and activity of two lowland river fishes, Murray cod Maccullochella peelii and golden perch Macquaria ambigua, in a weir pool environment in south-eastern Australia. We compared our results to published studies on riverine populations to determine if their behaviours are similar (or not). We show that M. peelii and M. ambigua in a weir pool exhibited some similar behaviours to conspecific riverine populations, such as strong site fidelity and use of woody habitat for M. ambigua. However, some behaviours, such as large-scale (tens-hundreds of kilometres) movements documented for riverine populations, were rarely observed. These differences potentially reflect flow regulation (e.g., stable water levels, loss of hydraulic cues) in the weir pool. The two species also exhibited contrasting responses to dissolved oxygen conditions in the weir pool, which may reflect differences in their life history. Overall, this study shows that although some aspects of these two native fishes' life history can continue despite flow regulation, other aspects may change in weir pools, potentially impacting on long-term population persistence.Entities:
Keywords: accelerometer; acoustic telemetry; native fish conservation; river regulation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32017088 PMCID: PMC7079010 DOI: 10.1111/jfb.14275
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Fish Biol ISSN: 0022-1112 Impact factor: 2.051
Figure 1Map showing location of the study area
Details of the tagged and during the study
| Species | ID | TL (mm) | Mass (g) | Total linear range (km) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| MC1 | 404 | 967 | 1.8 |
| MC2 | 407 | 1162 | 1.2 | |
| MC3 | 702 | 6785 | 10.0 | |
| MC4 | 425 | 1122 | 2.6 | |
| MC5 | 698 | 6381 | 7.4 | |
| MC6 | 470 | 1807 | 2.2 | |
| MC7 | 320 | 422 | 0.4 | |
| MC8 | 366 | 692 | 0.6 | |
| MC9 | 390 | 799 | 1.2 | |
| MC10 | 320 | 410 | 0.8 | |
| MC11 | 325 | 440 | 0.2 | |
| MC12 | 344 | 559 | 0.8 | |
| MC13 | 360 | 645 | 0.2 | |
| MC14 | 350 | 536 | 0.6 | |
| MC15 | 710 | 6255 | 5.2 | |
| MC16 | 650 | 5184 | 47.1 | |
| MC17 | 390 | 876 | 1.6 | |
| MC18 | 780 | 10,000 | 7.3 | |
| MC19 | 550 | 2688 | 3.5 | |
| MC20 | 710 | 7083 | 3.4 | |
| MC21 | 440 | 1111 | 5.4 | |
| MC22 | 410 | 975 | 5.6 | |
| MC23 | 510 | 2022 | 2.1 | |
|
| GP1 | 360 | 782 | 6.0 |
| GP2 | 354 | 855 | 1.2 | |
| GP3 | 340 | 730 | 11.2 | |
| GP4 | 400 | 1228 | 1.2 | |
| GP5 | 314 | 523 | 3.0 | |
| GP6 | 379 | 994 | 3.4 | |
| GP7 | 321 | 565 | 2.0 | |
| GP8 | 350 | 808 | 2.0 | |
| GP9 | 357 | 802 | 2.6 | |
| GP10 | 348 | 702 | 48.7 | |
| GP11 | 330 | 636 | 6.0 | |
| GP12 | 340 | 664 | 3.8 | |
| GP13 | 340 | 719 | 0.8 | |
| GP14 | 320 | 585 | 26.9 | |
| GP15 | 415 | 1408 | 4.0 |
Note: ID, identification number; TL, total length.
Figure 2Discharge (black line) and water level (grey line) (left) and dissolved oxygen (black line) and water temperature (grey line) (right) in Broken Creek at Rices Weir throughout the study period
Figure 3Modelled habitat use of throughout the year. Grey shading denotes 95% credible interval
Figure 4Modelled habitat use of throughout day and night. Grey shading denotes 95% credible interval
Figure 5Examples of movement patterns of tagged in Broken Creek. Grey circles show detections of tagged fish on the listening stations
Figure 6Examples of movement patterns of tagged in Broken Creek. Grey circles show detections of tagged fish on the listening stations
Figure 7Daily mean activity patterns of (left) and (right) in Broken Creek throughout the study period. Grey circles represent night and white circles represent day
Association of environmental variables with activity of (a) M. peelii and (b) M. ambigua in Broken Creek
| Parameter | Estimate | Lower bound | Upper bound | Estimate as a percentage of standard deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) | ||||
| Previous activity | 0.295 | 0.294 | 0.296 | 184% |
| Dissolved oxygen | 0.016 | 0.014 | 0.018 | 10% |
| Change in dissolved oxygen | 0.066 | 0.048 | 0.084 | 41% |
| Flow | 0.021 | 0.019 | 0.022 | 13% |
| Change in flow | −0.014 | −0.018 | −0.010 | 9% |
| Dusk compared to day | −0.004 | −0.008 | 0.000 | 2% |
| Night compared to day | −0.002 | −0.005 | 0.000 | 1% |
| Dawn compared to day | 0.005 | 0.001 | 0.009 | 3% |
| Mean day activity | 0.663 | 0.647 | 0.680 | |
| Standard deviation (overall) | 0.160 | 0.159 | 0.161 | |
| (b) | ||||
| Previous activity | 0.248 | 0.247 | 0.249 | 188% |
| Dissolved oxygen | 0.011z | 0.008 | 0.013 | 8% |
| Change in dissolved oxygen | −0.085 | −0.107 | −0.064 | 65% |
| Flow | 0.011 | 0.009 | 0.013 | 8% |
| Change in flow | −0.004 | −0.010 | 0.003 | 3% |
| Dusk compared to day | 0.002 | −0.003 | 0.007 | 1% |
| Night compared to day | −0.007 | −0.010 | −0.004 | 5% |
| Dawn compared to day | −0.006 | −0.011 | −0.002 | 5% |
| Mean day activity | 0.723 | 0.699 | 0.748 | |
| Standard deviation (overall) | 0.131 | 0.130 | 0.132 |
Note: Lower bound, lower 95% credible interval; upper bound, upper 95% credible interval.