Literature DB >> 32016526

Precipitation and predation risk alter the diversity and behavior of pollinators and reduce plant fitness.

Pablo A P Antiqueira1, Paula M de Omena2, Thiago Gonçalves-Souza3, Camila Vieira4,5, Gustavo H Migliorini4,6, Mônica F Kersch-Becker7, Tiago N Bernabé4,6, Fátima C Recalde4,8, Sandra Benavides- Gordillo4,8, Gustavo Q Romero4.   

Abstract

Biotic and abiotic factors may individually or interactively disrupt plant-pollinator interactions, influencing plant fitness. Although variations in temperature and precipitation are expected to modify the overall impact of predators on plant-pollinator interactions, few empirical studies have assessed if these weather conditions influence anti-predator behaviors and how this context-dependent response may cascade down to plant fitness. To answer this question, we manipulated predation risk (using artificial spiders) in different years to investigate how natural variation in temperature and precipitation may affect diversity (richness and composition) and behavioral (visitation) responses of flower-visiting insects to predation risk, and how these effects influence plant fitness. Our findings indicate that predation risk and an increase in precipitation independently reduced plant fitness (i.e., seed set) by decreasing flower visitation. Predation risk reduced pollinator visitation and richness, and altered species composition of pollinators. Additionally, an increase in precipitation was associated with lower flower visitation and pollinator richness but did not alter pollinator species composition. However, maximum daily temperature did not affect any component of the pollinator assemblage or plant fitness. Our results indicate that biotic and abiotic drivers have different impacts on pollinator behavior and diversity with consequences for plant fitness components. Even small variation in precipitation conditions promotes complex and substantial cascading effects on plants by affecting both pollinator communities and the outcome of plant-pollinator interactions. Tropical communities are expected to be highly susceptible to climatic changes, and these changes may have drastic consequences for biotic interactions in the tropics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cascading effect; Climatic conditions; Plant–pollinator interactions; Predation; Visual cues

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32016526     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-020-04612-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  33 in total

1.  Climate-associated phenological advances in bee pollinators and bee-pollinated plants.

Authors:  Ignasi Bartomeus; John S Ascher; David Wagner; Bryan N Danforth; Sheila Colla; Sarah Kornbluth; Rachael Winfree
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Predicting species distribution and abundance responses to climate change: why it is essential to include biotic interactions across trophic levels.

Authors:  Wim H Van der Putten; Mirka Macel; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Fear in animals: a meta-analysis and review of risk assessment.

Authors:  Theodore Stankowich; Daniel T Blumstein
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Trait-mediated effects on flowers: artificial spiders deceive pollinators and decrease plant fitness.

Authors:  Thiago Gonçalves-Souza; Paula M Omena; José César Souza; Gustavo Q Romero
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.499

Review 5.  Multiple stressors on biotic interactions: how climate change and alien species interact to affect pollination.

Authors:  Oliver Schweiger; Jacobus C Biesmeijer; Riccardo Bommarco; Thomas Hickler; Philip E Hulme; Stefan Klotz; Ingolf Kühn; Mari Moora; Anders Nielsen; Ralf Ohlemüller; Theodora Petanidou; Simon G Potts; Petr Pyšek; Jane C Stout; Martin T Sykes; Thomas Tscheulin; Montserrat Vilà; Gian-Reto Walther; Catrin Westphal; Marten Winter; Martin Zobel; Josef Settele
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2010-11

6.  The role of spider hunting mode on the strength of spider-plant mutualisms.

Authors:  Mônica F Kersch-Becker; Bruno B Grisolia; Maria J O Campos; Gustavo Q Romero
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  How context dependent are species interactions?

Authors:  Scott A Chamberlain; Judith L Bronstein; Jennifer A Rudgers
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  Early onset of spring increases the phenological mismatch between plants and pollinators.

Authors:  Gaku Kudo; Takashi Y Ida
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  Fifty Years of Mountain Passes: A Perspective on Dan Janzen's Classic Article.

Authors:  Kimberly S Sheldon; Raymond B Huey; Michael Kaspari; Nathan J Sanders
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  A meta-analysis of predation risk effects on pollinator behaviour.

Authors:  Gustavo Q Romero; Pablo A P Antiqueira; Julia Koricheva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Periodically taken photographs reveal the effect of pollinator insects on seed set in lotus flowers.

Authors:  Mihoko Nagai; Yohei Higuchi; Yusei Ishikawa; Wei Guo; Tokihiro Fukatsu; Yuki G Baba; Mayura B Takada
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Which Seed Properties Determine the Preferences of Carabid Beetle Seed Predators?

Authors:  Hana Foffová; Sanja Ćavar Zeljković; Alois Honěk; Zdenka Martinková; Petr Tarkowski; Pavel Saska
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.769

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.