Literature DB >> 32016494

[Tenoarthrolysis after flexor tendon injuries].

Thomas Pillukat1, Joachim Windolf2, Jörg van Schoonhoven3.   

Abstract

Normal function of the fingers and thumb depends on properly gliding flexor tendons and a free range of motion of the involved joints. This normal gliding function may be inhibited by adhesions due to damage of the tendon, tendon sheath and adjacent tissue. When digital function is still limited despite a long-term course of hand therapy and there are no signs of further improvement, surgical intervention should be considered. There are no absolute indications for tenoathrolysis of the flexor tendons. With respect to complications, such as secondary tendon rupture, loss of annular pulleys and scar formation, it is part of a stepwise reconstructive concept including further procedures, such as staged flexor tendon reconstruction. Important preconditions for tenoathrolysis are motivation of the patient, the possibility of readily available and frequent postoperative follow-up hand therapy, healed fractures and osteotomy, mature soft tissue, intact tendons and gliding tissue. Preoperatively, a maximum passive range of motion of the involved joints should be achieved. During the operative procedure all adhesive tissue surrounding the tendon within and outside the tendon sheath is consistently resected preserving the annular pulleys as far as possible. Therefore, extensive approaches, arthrolysis, dissolution of unfavorable scar tissue, resection of scarred lumbrical muscles and annular pulley reconstruction are frequently necessary. Salvage procedures, such as arthrodesis, amputation, ray resection or multistage flexor tendon reconstruction are recommended in failed cases and should be considered even preoperatively. In order to retain the intraoperative functional improvement hand therapy for at least 3-6 months should follow.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aftercare; Hand injuries; Reconstructive surgical procedures; Tendon injuries; Tissue adhesions

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32016494     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-020-00778-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  40 in total

Review 1.  Flexor tenolysis.

Authors:  Sheri B Feldscher; Lawrence H Schneider
Journal:  Hand Surg       Date:  2002-07

Review 2.  Flexor tendon pulley reconstruction.

Authors:  Tod A Clark; Kshamata Skeete; Peter C Amadio
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.230

3.  Optimization of flexor tenolysis using a suture.

Authors:  Thierry Dubert; Paulo Favalli
Journal:  Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg       Date:  2005-12

4.  The effect of partial excision of the A2 and A4 pulleys on the biomechanics of finger flexion.

Authors:  M Tomaino; G Mitsionis; J Basitidas; R Grewal; J Pfaeffle
Journal:  J Hand Surg Br       Date:  1998-02

5.  [Analysis of change in finger function after flexor tenolysis].

Authors:  R Koller; M S Choi; G S Bayer; H Millesi
Journal:  Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.018

6.  Incidence of tenolysis and features of adhesions in the digital flexor tendons after multi-strand repair and early active motion.

Authors:  Koji Moriya; Takea Yoshizu; Naoto Tsubokawa; Hiroko Narisawa; Yutaka Maki
Journal:  J Hand Surg Eur Vol       Date:  2018-11-12

7.  The role of flexor tenolysis in the palm and digits.

Authors:  J H Whitaker; J W Strickland; R K Ellis
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 2.230

8.  The zig-zag volar-digital incision for flexor-tendon surgery.

Authors:  J M Bruner
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1967-12       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Results of flexor tendon surgery in zone II.

Authors:  J W Strickland
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 1.907

10.  Flexor tenolysis.

Authors:  J W Strickland
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 1.907

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.