Literature DB >> 32016136

Influence of background lung characteristics on nodule detection with computed tomography.

Boning Li1, Taylor B Smith2, Kingshuk R Choudhury2,3, Brian Harrawood2, Lukas Ebner4, Justus E Roos5, Geoffrey D Rubin2.   

Abstract

We sought to characterize local lung complexity in chest computed tomography (CT) and to characterize its impact on the detectability of pulmonary nodules. Forty volumetric chest CT scans were created by embedding between three and five simulated 5-mm lung nodules into one of three volumetric chest CT datasets. Thirteen radiologists evaluated 157 nodules, resulting in 2041 detection opportunities. Analyzing the substrate CT data prior to nodule insertion, 14 image features were measured within a region around each nodule location. A generalized linear mixed-effects statistical model was fit to the data to verify the contribution of each metric on detectability. The model was tuned for simplicity, interpretability, and generalizability using stepwise regression applied to the primary features and their interactions. We found that variables corresponding to each of five categories (local structural distractors, local intensity, global context, local vascularity, and contiguity with structural distractors) were significant ( p < 0.01 ) factors in a standardized model. Moreover, reader-specific models conveyed significant differences among readers with significant distraction (missed detections) influenced by local intensity- versus local-structural characteristics being mutually exclusive. Readers with significant local intensity distraction ( n = 10 ) detected substantially fewer lung nodules than those who were significantly distracted by local structure ( n = 2 ), 46.1% versus 65.3% mean nodules detected, respectively.
© 2020 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Keywords:  anatomical complexity; computed tomography; generalized linear statistical model; image perception; interobserver variability; lung nodule detectability; observer performance

Year:  2020        PMID: 32016136      PMCID: PMC6982463          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.7.2.022409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  7 in total

1.  Truncated product method for combining P-values.

Authors:  D V Zaykin; Lev A Zhivotovsky; P H Westfall; B S Weir
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 2.  An overview of techniques for dealing with large numbers of independent variables in epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  I R Dohoo; C Ducrot; C Fourichon; A Donald; D Hurnik
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.670

3.  Characterizing search, recognition, and decision in the detection of lung nodules on CT scans: elucidation with eye tracking.

Authors:  Geoffrey D Rubin; Justus E Roos; Martin Tall; Brian Harrawood; Sukantadev Bag; Donald L Ly; Danielle M Seaman; Lynne M Hurwitz; Sandy Napel; Kingshuk Roy Choudhury
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Local complexity metrics to quantify the effect of anatomical noise on detectability of lung nodules in chest CT imaging.

Authors:  Taylor Brunton Smith; Geoffrey D Rubin; Justin Solomon; Brian Harrawood; Kingshuk Roy Choudhury; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-11-22

5.  Survival of patients with stage I lung cancer detected on CT screening.

Authors:  Claudia I Henschke; David F Yankelevitz; Daniel M Libby; Mark W Pasmantier; James P Smith; Olli S Miettinen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Clustered Multi-Task Learning Via Alternating Structure Optimization.

Authors:  Jiayu Zhou; Jianhui Chen; Jieping Ye
Journal:  Adv Neural Inf Process Syst       Date:  2011

7.  Cancer statistics, 2016.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 508.702

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.