| Literature DB >> 32015860 |
Peter Mueller1,2, Dirk Granse2, Stefanie Nolte3,4, Magdalena Weingartner5, Stefan Hoth5, Kai Jensen2.
Abstract
Tidal wetlands are effective carbon sinks, mitigating climate change through the long-term removal of atmospheric CO2. Studies along surface-elevation and thus flooding-frequency gradients in tidal wetlands are often used to understand the effects of accelerated sea-level rise on carbon sequestration, a process that is primarily determined by the balance of primary production and microbial decomposition. It has often been hypothesized that rates of microbial decomposition would increase with elevation and associated increases in soil oxygen availability; however, previous studies yield a wide range of outcomes and equivocal results. Our mechanistic understanding of the elevation-decomposition relationship is limited because most effort has been devoted to understanding the terminal steps of the decomposition process. A few studies assessed microbial exo-enzyme activities (EEAs) as initial and rate-limiting steps that often reveal important insight into microbial energy and nutrient constraints. The present study assessed EEAs and microbial abundance along a coastal ecotone stretching a flooding gradient from tidal flat to high marsh in the European Wadden Sea. We found that stabilization of exo-enzymes to mineral sediments leads to high specific EEAs at low substrate concentrations in frequently flooded, sediment-rich zones of the studied ecotone. We argue that the high background activity of a mineral-associated enzyme pool provides a stable decomposition matrix in highly dynamic, frequently flooded zones. Furthermore, we demonstrate that microbial communities are less nutrient limited in frequently flooded zones, where inputs of nutrient-rich marine organic matter are higher. This was reflected in both increasing exo-enzymatic carbon versus nutrient acquisition and decreasing fungal versus bacterial abundance with increasing flooding frequency. Our findings thereby suggest two previously unrecognized mechanisms that may contribute to stimulated microbial activity despite decreasing oxygen availability in response to accelerated sea-level rise.Entities:
Keywords: Indicator of Reduction in Soils; carbon sequestration; exo‐enzymes; fungi; quantitative PCR; salt marsh; sea‐level rise
Year: 2020 PMID: 32015860 PMCID: PMC6988540 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5962
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Conceptual diagram of opposing soil environmental gradients along a tidal‐flat/salt‐marsh ecotone. Photographs show sampling positions and typical plant communities along the zonation of a naturally developed salt marsh at Dieksanderkoog, German North Sea. NHN = Normalhöhennull (German standard ordnance datum) (photographs: P. Mueller)
Overview table of soil parameters quantified in five zones of a surface‐elevation gradient in a tidal‐flat/salt‐marsh ecotone (compare Figure 1)
| Zone | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OM (% mass) | 3.26 ± 0.40 | 4.70 ± 0.18 | 5.08 ± 0.29 | 7.80 ± 0.29 | 11.63 ± 0.63 |
|
| δ13C (‰ VPDB) | −23.36 ± 0.07 | −23.01 ± 0.10 | −23.17 ± 0.23 | −25.87 ± 0.10 | −26.69 ± 0.07 |
|
| C:N (mass) | 8.12 ± 0.26 | 8.17 ± 0.17 | 9.86 ± 0.23 | 10.30 ± 0.22 | 10.85 ± 0.15 |
|
| C:P (mass) | 155 ± 23 | 158 ± 9 | 192 ± 16 | 232 ± 18 | 443 ± 23 |
|
| pH | 7.80 ± 0.02 | 7.80 ± 0.02 | 7.75 ± 0.02 | 7.77 ± 0.03 | 7.80 ± 0.04 | .546 |
| Salinity (ppt) | 33.6 ± 1.7 | 35.2 ± 1.0 | 30.5 ± 2.0 | 27.8 ± 2.2 | 21.4 ± 4.4 |
|
| Eh_normal (mV) | 204 ± 56 | 301 ± 63 | 244 ± 125 | 300 ± 109 | 386 ± 30 |
|
| Eh_spring (mV) | 67 ± 37 | 173 ± 3 | −68 ± 13 | 33 ± 6 | 314 ± 11 |
|
Shown are mean values ± SE and p‐values for comparisons of mean values between zones. Pearson's r, significant correlations are bold‐typed at p ≤ .05.
Abbreviations: Eh_normal, soil redox measured after normal tide; Eh_spring, soil redox measured after spring tide; OM, organic matter.
Figure 2(a) Exo‐enzyme activity (EEA) of ß‐glucosidase (GLU), aminopeptidase (PEP), chitinase (CHI), and phosphatase (PHO) and (b) EEA activity ratios (C:N activity = GLU/PEP+CHI; C:P activity = GLU/PHO) along five zones (1–5) stretching an elevation gradient from tidal flat (1) to high marsh (5) (compare Figure 1). Shown are mean values ± SE. EEAs and EEA ratios that were significantly affected by zone are marked with an asterisk at p ≤ .05 based on 1‐way ANOVA
Direct and partial correlation matrices for EEAs that significantly decreased along the five zones from tidal flat to high marsh (GLU and PHO; compare Figure 2a)
| OM | Salinity | δ13C | C:N | C:P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) Direct correlations | |||||
| GLU |
| 0.304 |
|
|
|
| PHO |
| 0.121 |
|
|
|
| (b) Partial correlations: OM versus EEAs controlling for factors in columns | |||||
| Corr. (OM vs. GLU) | – |
|
|
|
|
| Corr. (OM vs. PHO) | – |
|
|
|
|
| (c) Partial correlations: factors in columns versus EEAs controlling for OM | |||||
| GLU | – | −0.116 | −0.249 | −0.259 | 0.126 |
| PHO | – | −0.293 | −0.321 | 0.058 | 0.106 |
(a) Direct correlations between specific EEAs and soil factors potentially explaining the EEA responses along the surface‐elevation gradient. (b) Correlations between EEAs and organic matter (as the strongest predictor identified in a) while controlling for other factors. (c) Correlations between EEAs and factors potentially explaining the EEA responses along the surface‐elevation gradient while controlling for the effect of organic matter (as the strongest predictor identified in a). Values represent Pearson's r, significant correlations are bold‐typed at p ≤ .05.
Abbreviation: OM, organic matter.
Figure 3(a) Absolute exo‐enzyme activity (EEA per unit dry weight) and (b) specific activity (EEA per unit organic matter) of ß‐glucosidase versus mineral/organic matter content. Bars represent data interpretation based on the linear function y‐intercept in panel a, indicating a relatively constant background activity of ca. 90 nmol gDW−1 hr−1 (i.e., when organic matter approaches 0%) associated with a mineral‐bound enzyme pool. The high y‐intercept of the linear function in panel (a) translates to a negative power function in panel (b) upon unit conversion from absolute to specific EEA. Bars have been converted proportionally from panel a to b. See Figure S4 for further specific EEA versus organic matter relationships
Direct and partial correlation matrices
| Direct | Partial correlations | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| (a) C:N activity | Corr. ( δ13C vs. C:N activity) | Controlling for δ13C | |
| OM |
|
| −0.182 |
| Salinity |
|
| 0.027 |
| δ13C |
| – | – |
| C:N |
|
| −0.209 |
| C:P |
|
| −0.155 |
| (b) C:P activity | Corr. (C:N vs. C:P activity) | Controlling for C:N | |
| OM |
|
| −0.103 |
| Salinity |
|
| 0.088 |
| δ13C |
|
| 0.018 |
| C:N |
| – | – |
| C:P |
|
| −0.022 |
(a) Left column: direct correlations between microbial C:N activity and soil factors potentially explaining the EEA ratio response along the surface‐elevation gradient; middle column: correlations between C:N activity and δ13C (as the strongest predictor identified in direct correlations) controlling for other factors (in rows); right column: correlations between C:N activity and factors potentially explaining the EEA ratio response along the surface‐elevation gradient while controlling for δ13C (as the strongest predictor identified in direct correlations). (b) Left column: direct correlations between microbial C:P activity and factors potentially explaining the EEA ratio response along the surface‐elevation gradient; middle column: correlations between C:P activity and soil C:N ratio (as the strongest predictor identified in direct correlations) controlling for other factors (in rows); right column: correlations between C:P activity and factors potentially explaining the EEA ratio response along the surface‐elevation gradient while controlling for soil C:N (as the strongest predictor identified in direct correlations). Values represent Pearson's r, bold‐typed at p ≤ .05.
Abbreviation: OM, organic matter.
Figure 4Bacterial and fungal gene abundance along five zones (1–5) stretching an elevation gradient from tidal flat (1) to high marsh (5) (compare Figure 1). Shown are mean values ± SE. One‐way ANOVA indicates a significant effect of zone on fungal abundance (p < .0001, but no effect on bacterial abundance (p = .755). Note separate y‐axes for bacterial and fungal abundance
(a) Direct correlations between fungal gene abundance (per unit organic matter) and soil factors potentially explaining the fungal response along the studied elevation gradient. (b and c) Partial correlations evaluating the importance of soil C:P ratio [as the strongest predictor identified in (a)] and fungal abundance
| OM | salinity | δ13C | C:N | C:P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) Factors in columns versus fungal abundance | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (b) C:P versus fungal abundance controlling for factors in columns | ||||
|
|
|
|
| – |
| (c) Factors in columns versus fungal abundance controlling for C:P | ||||
| −0.057 | −0.060 | −0.078 | 0.017 | – |
Values represent Pearson's r, significant correlations are bold‐typed at p ≤ .05.
Abbreviation: OM, organic matter.
Figure 5Conceptual diagram of flooding‐frequency effects on microbial structure and exo‐enzyme activity (EEA) in a minerogenic salt‐marsh ecosystem. ± symbols on arrows indicate positive/negative relationships between parameters in boxes as exemplified in the following: (1) Our data provide evidence of a mineral matter‐associated enzyme pool leading to high specific EEAs at low organic matter contents (Table 2; Figures 3 and S4). We argue that enzyme stabilization to minerals could enable rapid microbial utilization of substrates during short phases of frequently re‐occurring suitable environmental conditions in tidal wetlands. (2) Higher flooding frequency increases inorganic and organic nutrient (N+P) supply to the soil system. Soil N is almost exclusively organically bound and strongly controlled by the supply of N‐rich allochthonous organic matter (Figures S2 and S3). The importance of allochthonous organic input for P supply is less clear (Figures S2 and S3). (3) Nutrient availability and allochthonous organic input determine microbial C versus nutrient acquisition and specific fungal abundance (Tables 3 and 4)