| Literature DB >> 32015679 |
I-Wen Wu1,2, Chan-Yu Lin2,3, Lun-Ching Chang4, Chin-Chan Lee1, Chih-Yung Chiu5, Heng-Jung Hsu1, Chiao-Yin Sun1, Yuen-Chan Chen1,2, Yu-Lun Kuo6, Chi-Wei Yang2,3, Sheng-Siang Gao7, Wen-Ping Hsieh7, Wen-Hung Chung8, Hsin-Chih Lai9,10, Shih-Chi Su8.
Abstract
The interplay of the gut microbes with gut-producing nephrotoxins and the renal progression remains unclear in large human cohort. Significant compositional and functional differences in the intestinal microbiota (by 16S rRNA gene sequencing) were noted among 30 controls and 92 (31 mild, 30 moderate and 31 advanced) patients at different chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages (discovery cohort). A core CKD-associated microbiota consisted of 7 genera (Escherichia_Shigella, Dialister, Lachnospiraceae_ND3007_group, Pseudobutyrivibrio, Roseburia, Paraprevotella and Ruminiclostridium) and 2 species (Collinsella stercoris and Bacteroides eggerthii) were identified to be highly correlated with the stages of CKD. Paraprevotella, Pseudobutyrivibrio and Collinsella stercoris were superior in discriminating CKD from the controls than the use of urine protein/creatinine ratio, even at early-stage of disease. The performance was further confirmed in a validation cohort comprising 22 controls and 76 peritoneal dialysis patients. Bacterial genera highly correlated with indoxyl sulfate and p-cresyl sulfate levels were identified. Prediction of the functional capabilities of microbial communities showed that microbial genes related to the metabolism of aromatic amino acids (phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan) were differentially enriched among the control and different CKD stages. Collectively, our results provide solid human evidence of the impact of gut-metabolite-kidney axis on the severity of chronic kidney disease and highlight a usefulness of specific gut microorganisms as possible disease differentiate marker of this global health burden. © The author(s).Entities:
Keywords: Chronic kidney disease; and indoxyl sulfate; gut microbiome; p-cresyl sulfate
Year: 2020 PMID: 32015679 PMCID: PMC6990903 DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.37421
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Biol Sci ISSN: 1449-2288 Impact factor: 6.580
Baseline characteristics of study population (n=130)
| Non-CKD (n=30) | Mild CKD (n=31) | Moderate CKD (n=30) | Advanced CKD (n=31) | AST-120 (n=8) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 61.6 ± 8.7 | 62.4 ± 4.1 | 63.6 ± 6.1 | 66.2 ± 7.4 | 67 ± 10.1 |
| Male gender, n (%) | 12 (40%) | 14 (45.2%) | 18 (60%) | 15 (48.4%) | 2 (25%) |
| Diabetes, n (%) | 19 (63.3%) | 16 (51.6%) | 15 (50%) | 17 (54.8%) | 3 (37.5%) |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 27 (87.1%) | 23 (76.7%) | 26 (86.7%) | 30 (96.8%) | 6 (75%) |
| Diastolic pressure, mm Hg | 74.1 ± 9.5 | 75.4 ± 12.1 | 75 ± 8.4 | 75.3 ± 12.3 | 71.6 ± 5.6 |
| Systolic pressure, mm Hg | 130.1 ± 18.4 | 132.3 ± 17.2 | 127.3 ± 13.9 | 137.9 ± 14.3 | 139.8 ± 16.2 |
| Body mass index, Kg/m2 | 25.5 ± 3.4 | 27.5 ± 3.6 | 26.5 ± 4.2 | 25.9 ± 4.3 | 25.9 ± 4.3 |
| Waist, cm | 85.3 ± 8.8 | 92.7 ± 11.1 | 88.6 ± 7.5 | 88.6 ± 10.7 | 91.5 ± 8.02 |
| Blood urea nitrogen, mg/dL | 13.4 ± 3.9 | 16.5 ± 4.8 | 19.6 ± 5.9 | 61 ± 26.1* | 69.3 ± 39.4* |
| Serum creatinine, mg/dL | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 1.4 ± 0.5 | 4.4 ± 2.3* | 6.1 ± 2.9* |
| Estimated GFR, mL/min/m2 | 112.4 ± 54.4 | 71.4 ± 22.1* | 49.9 ± 10.2* | 16.2 ± 10* | 14.1 ± 18.6* |
| UPCR, g/g# | 87.6 (87.2) | 136.6 (347.8) | 104.3 (171.9) | 1596.1 (2305.8) | 1348.6 (1060.5) |
| Hemoglobin, g/dL | 13.3 ± 0.9 | 13.9 ± 1.3 | 12.9 ± 1.3 | 10.0 ± 1.9* | 9.6 ± 1.6* |
| Serum albumin, mg/dL | 4.6 ± 0.3 | 4.6 ± 0.3 | 4.5 ± 0.3 | 4.1 ± 0.6* | 4.2 ± 0.4* |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 191.42 ± 30.77 | 186.52 ± 25.32 | 171.5 ± 29.26 | 193.66 ± 47.84 | 152.56 ± 46.35 |
| LDL-cholesterol, mg/dL | 111.46 ± 30.61 | 107.55 ± 22.58 | 95.35 ± 25.33 | 109.05 ± 35.16 | 86.06 ± 40.58 |
| Triglyceride, mg/dL | 159.39 ± 99.92 | 129.61 ± 65.29 | 141.8 ± 83.11 | 182.25 ± 153.55 | 115 ± 81.04 |
| hs-CRP, mg/L# | 1.23 (1.45) | 1.37 (2.15) | 1.19 (1.45) | 2.23(7.88) | 1.07 (1.49) |
| Estimated protein intake, g/day | 77.9 ± 28.2 | 70.6 ± 22.6 | 58.6 ± 21 | 58.6 ± 21.1 | 57.5 ± 20.6 |
Data are expressed in mean (SD) or median (interquartile range)#.
Abbreviation: CKD, chronic kidney disease; GFR, filtration glomerular rate; hs-CRP, high sensitive C reactive protein; UPCR, urine protein-creatinine ratio. * p < 0.005 vs normal.
Estimated protein intake (g/day) = 6.25 × [Urine urea nitrogen (g/day) + 30 mg/kg/day × Weight (kg)].
Figure 1(A) Species accumulation curve of the gut bacterial communities detected in non-CKD controls and CKD patients. The line indicates the averaged accumulated increase of detected OTUs vs. number of samples. The box-plots show the mean, the 25th, and the 75th percentile at each sample size. (B) Rarefaction curves show the number of sequence reads and their corresponding number of OTUs across different groups. Mil. CKD (mild CKD); Mod. CKD (moderate CKD); Adv. CKD (advanced CKD); AST (advanced CKD with the treatment of AST-120).
Figure 2Analysis of gut microbiota composition and diversity in discovery cohort by CKD stages. (A) The distribution of top 10 phyla and top 10 genera (B) detected in different phenotypic subgroups. Heatmaps of top 12 phyla (C) and top 35 genera (D) associated with different groups are shown. E) α-diversity (Chao 1) and (F) β-diversity (Bray-Curtis similarity index) of gut microbial communities in different CKD stages. The box-plot shows the median, the 25th, and the 75th percentile in each group. Chao1 index was analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test, and Bray-Curtis distance between groups was calculated by Wilcoxon rank sum test. *, p <0.05; **, p <0.01; ***, p <0.001; n.s., not significant. Mil. CKD (mild CKD); Mod. CKD (moderate CKD); Adv. CKD (advanced CKD).
Figure 3Analysis of gut microbiota composition and diversity in discovery and validation cohort. Distribution of top 10 genera among fecal samples of participants of discovery (A) and validation cohorts (B). Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination displaying gut microbial communities of different stages of CKD (C) and between non-CKD controls and PD patients (D).
Figure 4Core CKD-associated microbiota significantly correlated with different disease stage. Spearman's correlation indexes (r) and p values (p) are shown under the genus of bacteria. The locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS) regression curves indicate the trends of correlations between the levels of bacterial genera and the progression of CKD. Mil. CKD (mild CKD); Mod. CKD (moderate CKD); Adv. CKD (advanced CKD).
Figure 5Determination of bacterial biomarkers specific for each CKD stage or most discriminatory across different disease stages. CKD severity-discriminatory taxa were determined by applying Random Forests analysis using the overall OUT (A), only genus-levels abundance (B) or only species-level abundance (C) dataset against CKD stages. Bacterial taxa that are most discriminatory across different CKD stages were ranked in descending order of their importance to the accuracy of the model. Importance was determined based on the percentage of mean decrease in accuracy of microbiota prediction when the relative abundance of each taxon was randomly permuted. (D) Bacterial taxa that best characterize each CKD stage were identified by using linear discriminant analysis of effect size (LEfSe) on OTU tables. E) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on Bray-Curtis distance calculated by using top 10 discriminatory taxa identified in (A) among samples of different groups. The percentage in each axis indicates how much variation explained.
Clinical validity for potential biomarkers in discriminating the controls from CKD patients with different severities.
| Biomarker | Validation cohort | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-CKD (30) vs. mild CKD (31) | Non-CKD (30) vs. overall CKD (92) | Non-CKD (22) vs. PD (76) | |||||
| AUC (95% CI) | P value/Pc value | AUC (95% CI) | P value/Pc value | AUC (95% CI) | P value/Pc value | ||
| Tyzzerella 3↓ | 0.73 (0.60-0.86) | 0.002/0.2 | 0.86 (0.79-0.92) | <0.001/ | n.d. | n.d. | |
| Paraprevotella↓ | 0.76 (0.64-0.88) | <0.001/ | 0.78 (0.70-0.87) | <0.001/ | 0.76 (0.62-0.89) | <0.001/ | |
| Lachnospiraceae ND3007 group↓ | 0.75 (0.62-0.87) | <0.001/0.09 | 0.78 (0.70-0.87) | <0.001/ | 0.64 (0.50-0.77) | 0.04/4.1 | |
| Eubacterium ruminantium group↓ | 0.66 (0.52-0.81) | 0.03/2.842 | 0.77 (0.69-0.86) | <0.001/ | n.d. | n.d. | |
| Pseudobutyrivibrio↓ | 0.7 (0.57-0.84) | 0.006/0.6 | 0.76 (0.67-0.84) | <0.001/ | 0.72 (0.62-0.82) | <0.001/ | |
| Lactobacillus↑ | 0.66 (0.51-0.80) | 0.04/3.528 | 0.74 (0.62-0.86) | <0.001/ | 0.89 (0.81-0.97) | <0.001/ | |
| Dialister↓ | 0.68 (0.55-0.82) | 0.01/1.372 | 0.73 (0.63-0.83) | <0.001/ | 0.75 (0.64-0.87) | <0.001/ | |
| Collinsella stercoris↑ | 0.83 (0.72-0.93) | <0.001/ | 0.86 (0.78-0.94) | <0.001/ | 0.94 (0.88-1.00) | <0.001/ | |
| Bacteroides eggerthii↓ | 0.79 (0.67-0.91) | <0.001/ | 0.81 (0.72-0.91) | <0.001/ | 0.59 (0.45-0.73) | 0.2/4.6 | |
| Streptococcus anginosus↑ | 0.64 (0.50-0.78) | 0.06/4.96 | 0.76 (0.67-0.86) | <0.001/ | n.d. | n.d. | |
| Bacteroides clarus↓ | 0.73 (0.61-0.86) | 0.002/0.1 | 0.75 (0.66-0.84) | <0.001/ | n.d. | n.d. | |
| Bacteroides plebeius↓ | 0.58 (0.44-0.73) | 0.2/20.8 | 0.74 (0.65-0.83) | <0.001/ | 0.81 (0.71-0.91) | <0.001/ | |
| Parabacteroides goldsteinii↓ | 0.74 (0.62-0.87) | 0.001/0.09 | 0.74 (0.64-0.83) | <0.001/ | 0.61 (0.47-0.74) | 0.1/2.0 | |
| Bacteroides massiliensis↓ | 0.66 (0.52-0.80) | 0.03/2.4 | 0.73 (0.65-0.82) | <0.001/ | n.d. | n.d. | |
| Phascolarctobacterium faecium↑ | 0.73 (0.60-0.85) | 0.002/0.2 | 0.73 (0.62-0.84) | <0.001/ | n.d. | n.d. | |
| Bacteroides stercoris↓ | 0.73 (0.60-0.86) | 0.002/0.1 | 0.72 (0.63-0.81) | <0.001/ | n.d. | n.d. | |
| Lactobacillus salivarius↑ | 0.66 (0.5-0.80) | 0.03/2.8 | 0.72 (0.60-0.84) | <0.001/ | 0.74 (0.68-0.80) | <0.001/ | |
| Ruminococcus callidus↓ | 0.57 (0.42-0.72) | 0.3/29.6 | 0.72 (0.62-0.81) | <0.001/ | n.d. | n.d. | |
| Blautia hydrogenotrophica↓ | 0.68 (0.54-0.82) | 0.01/1.2 | 0.71 (0.61-0.81) | <0.001/ | n.d. | n.d. | |
| Urine protein-creatinine ratio | 0.675 (0.54-0.81) | 0.02 | 0.755 (0.67-0.84) | <0.001 | |||
CKD, chronic kidney disease; PD, peritoneal dialysis; AUC, the total area under the ROC curve. Corrected P (Pc) values were adjusted by using Bonferroni's correction (Discovery: n=80, for species; n=98, for genus; Replication: n=23, for species; n=87, for genus). ↑ and ↓ indicate an ascending and descending trend of bacterial abundance with the disease progression, respectively. n.d., not determined.
Total area under the ROC curve for potential biomarkers in discriminating the controls from patients with moderate and advanced CKD.
| Biomarker | Non-CKD (30) vs. moderate CKD (30) | Non-CKD (30) vs. advanced CKD (31) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUC (95% CI) | P value/Pc value | AUC (95% CI) | P value/Pc value | ||
| Tyzzerella 3 | 0.93 (0.85-1.00) | 1.5E-08/ | 0.92 (0.83-1.00) | 1.9E-08/ | |
| Paraprevotella | 0.76 (0.62-0.89) | 0.00062/0.06076 | 0.83 (0.73-0.93) | 1.2E-05/ | |
| Lachnospiraceae ND3007 group | 0.72 (0.59-0.86) | 0.0029/0.2842 | 0.87 (0.79-0.96) | 5.7E-07/ | |
| Eubacterium ruminantium group | 0.86 (0.75-0.96) | 1.9E-06/ | 0.8 (0.68-0.92) | 5.3E-05/ | |
| Pseudobutyrivibrio | 0.72 (0.58-0.85) | 0.0037/0.3626 | 0.85 (0.75-0.95) | 6.9E-07/ | |
| Lactobacillus | 0.82 (0.70-0.93) | 2.6E-05/ | 0.74 (0.61-0.88) | 0.0011/0.1078 | |
| Dialister | 0.65 (0.51-0.80) | 0.041/4.018 | 0.84 (0.75-0.94) | 3.9E-06/ | |
| Collinsella stercoris | 0.9 (0.82-0.98) | 1.0E-07/ | 0.86 (0.76-0.96) | 1.5E-06/ | |
| Bacteroides eggerthii | 0.88 (0.78-0.97) | 4.9E-07/ | 0.77 (0.65-0.90) | 0.00024/ | |
| Streptococcus anginosus | 0.85 (0.75-0.95) | 2.6E-06/ | 0.8 (0.69-0.92) | 5.1E-05/ | |
| Bacteroides clarus | 0.85 (0.75-0.95) | 2.8E-06/ | 0.66 (0.53-0.80) | 0.028/2.24 | |
| Bacteroides plebeius | 0.82 (0.70-0.93) | 2.9E-05/ | 0.82 (0.71-0.93) | 1.9E-05/ | |
| Parabacteroides goldsteinii | 0.79 (0.67-0.91) | 0.00011/ | 0.68 (0.54-0.82) | 0.017/1.36 | |
| Bacteroides massiliensis | 0.74 (0.60-0.88) | 0.0013/0.104 | 0.8 (0.69-0.92) | 5.3E-05/ | |
| Phascolarctobacterium faecium | 0.78 (0.65-0.90) | 0.00026/ | 0.69 (0.55-0.83) | 0.011/0.88 | |
| Bacteroides stercoris | 0.78 (0.64-0.91) | 0.00026/ | 0.67 (0.52-0.81) | 0.025/2 | |
| Lactobacillus salivarius | 0.8 (0.67-0.93) | 6.7E-05/ | 0.7 (0.56-0.84) | 0.0085/0.68 | |
| Ruminococcus callidus | 0.79 (0.66-0.91) | 1.4E-04/ | 0.79 (0.68-0.91) | 0.00008/ | |
| Blautia hydrogenotrophica | 0.9 (0.82-0.98) | 1.1E-07/ | 0.56 (0.41-0.71) | 0.44/35.2 | |
| Urine protein-creatinine ratio | 0.603 (0.46-0.75) | 0.169 | 0.981 (0.95-1.00) | <0.001 | |
CKD, chronic kidney disease; AUC, the total area under the ROC curve.
Corrected P (Pc) values were adjusted by using Bonferroni's correction (n=80, for species; n=98, for genus).
Figure 6(A) Serum levels of uremic toxins at different CKD stages were compared by using Student's t test. * p<0.001. IS, indoxyl sulfate; pCS, p-cresyl sulfate. (B) Correlation among free-form and total uremic toxins.
Gut bacterial genera correlated with serum levels of indoxyl sulfate or p-cresyl sulfate in discovery cohort
| Indoxyl sulfate | Total-form | Free-form | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genus | R | P-value | Adjusted P | R | P-value | Adjusted P | |
| Ruminiclostridium_5 | 0.408250 | 0.000004 | 0.000245 | 0.364685 | 0.000077 | 0.004241 | |
| Dialister | -0.390723 | 0.000012 | 0.000671 | -0.410164 | 0.000007 | 0.000389 | |
| Escherichia_Shigella | 0.361672 | 0.000057 | 0.003150 | 0.413255 | 0.000006 | 0.000327 | |
| Alistipes | 0.359485 | 0.000064 | 0.003510 | 0.276417 | 0.003176 | 0.174654 | |
| unidentified_Ruminococcaceae | 0.342554 | 0.000146 | 0.008050 | 0.297251 | 0.001459 | 0.080226 | |
| Pseudobutyrivibrio | -0.338714 | 0.000176 | 0.009660 | -0.410466 | 0.000007 | 0.000383 | |
| Desulfovibrio | 0.311456 | 0.000597 | 0.032800 | 0.278645 | 0.002930 | 0.161158 | |
| Ruminococcaceae_UCG_002 | 0.301976 | 0.000890 | 0.048900 | 0.257879 | 0.006049 | 0.332694 | |
| Anaerostipes | -0.300192 | 0.000958 | 0.052700 | -0.422023 | 0.000004 | 0.000197 | |
| Ruminiclostridium | -0.291262 | 0.001375 | 0.075600 | -0.403412 | 0.000010 | 0.000568 | |
| Ruminococcaceae_UCG_004 | 0.285329 | 0.001737 | 0.095500 | 0.234490 | 0.012826 | 0.705415 | |
| Ruminococcaceae_UCG_005 | 0.278029 | 0.002301 | 0.127000 | 0.235933 | 0.012269 | 0.674768 | |
| Ruminiclostridium_5 | 0.447455 | <0.0001 | 0.000021 | 0.468585 | 0.000001 | 0.000033 | |
| Alistipes | 0.445359 | <0.0001 | 0.000024 | 0.400767 | 0.000027 | 0.001501 | |
| Ruminococcaceae_UCG_002 | 0.383635 | 0.000018 | 0.000990 | 0.361680 | 0.000174 | 0.009581 | |
| Ruminococcaceae_UCG_005 | 0.379890 | 0.000022 | 0.001220 | 0.372297 | 0.000108 | 0.005926 | |
| unidentified_Ruminococcaceae | 0.371433 | 0.000035 | 0.001900 | 0.284746 | 0.003555 | 0.195513 | |
| Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1 | 0.337451 | 0.000186 | 0.010200 | 0.349603 | 0.000295 | 0.016222 | |
| Ruminococcaceae_NK4A214_group | 0.320452 | 0.000404 | 0.022200 | 0.362512 | 0.000168 | 0.009233 | |
| Ruminococcaceae_UCG_004 | 0.318145 | 0.000447 | 0.024600 | 0.322497 | 0.000893 | 0.049107 | |
| Christensenellaceae_R_7_group | 0.290221 | 0.001433 | 0.078800 | 0.320379 | 0.000970 | 0.053323 | |
| Eubacterium_coprostanoligenes_gr | 0.289604 | 0.001468 | 0.080800 | 0.254246 | 0.009554 | 0.525487 | |
| Dialister | -0.281914 | 0.001983 | 0.109000 | -0.309122 | 0.001487 | 0.081799 | |
| Escherichia_Shigella | 0.278791 | 0.002235 | 0.123000 | 0.338280 | 0.000474 | 0.026084 | |
Bacterial genera present at or above 0.1% of the total were analyzed by the Spearman's rank correlation test. Corrected P values were adjusted by using Bonferroni's correction (n=55).
Figure 7Prediction of microbial gene functions across different CKD stages. Pathway enrichment for KEGG metabolism was inferred by PICRUSt. Difference in relative abundance of predicted microbial genes related to the metabolism and biosynthesis of aromatic and other amino acids among non-CKD controls and different stages of CKD was analyzed using Student's t test. *, p <0.05; **, p <0.01; ***, p <0.001.