Literature DB >> 32015611

Penile ring entrapment - A true urologic emergency: Grading, approach, and management.

Omar Dawood1, Seena Tabibi1, Julia Fiuk1, Neil Patel1, Ahmed El-Zawahry1.   

Abstract

Penile rings are used to sustain erection in order to enhance sexual pleasure. They work by reducing the outflow of blood from the cavernosal tissue. However, if left for extended periods of time severe edema, urethral fistula, gangrene, and even complete loss of the distal penis can ensue, this is known as penile ring entrapment (PRE). Management poses particular challenges due to its rarity. Herein, we report our experience with three patients from our institution that presented with PRE and include a review of the approaches others have taken. We also propose a simpler and more effective grading scale to allow for easier communication between providers, as the current grading scales do not do so. Copyright:
© 2019 Urology Annals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ischemia; penis; scrotum; trauma; urethra

Year:  2019        PMID: 32015611      PMCID: PMC6978966          DOI: 10.4103/UA.UA_16_19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Ann        ISSN: 0974-7796


INTRODUCTION

Since ancient times, penile rings have been used to enhance sexual pleasure. They work by constricting the outflow of blood from the penis, prolonging erection.[123] Different materials such as rubber bands, wedding rings, hammerheads, bullrings, and plastic bottlenecks have been used.[34] Regardless of the material used, constriction should be no longer than 30 min.[5] Prolonged constriction leads to severe ischemia and edema. If left unresolved, the penis will become necrotic and will eventually self-amputate. Urgent intervention is vital. Different treatment options have been elaborated. We report our experiences, treatment methods others have taken, and propose a newer grading scheme that will allow clinicians to swiftly and efficiently communicate the severity of this condition.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

We performed a retrospective review of charts from our institution from September 2012 to September 2018, identifying patients who presented with penile ring entrapment (PRE). We looked at patient characteristics, pattern of presentation, type of entrapment, and treatment. We also did a review of the literature to identify other treatment approaches for PRE.

RESULTS

We identified three patients who presented at our institution with PRE. The first patient is a 60-year-old Caucasian male who presented with a ring around his scrotum and penis for 48 h. He had excessive scrotal and penile edema with minimal bruises at the ring location. Initial attempts to reduce scrotal and penile swelling by compression (in order to slide the ring off easier) failed. Next, we gave anesthesia for comfort and then applied olive oil around the penis and scrotum as lubrication to help with sliding. A tongue blade was inserted between the ring and penis to protect underlying tissues during sliding. Continuous compression was applied until the edema decreased enough for the ring to slide off. We were successful and all soft tissues appeared viable. The second patient is a 28-year-old Caucasian who presented with a thick and wide wedding ring around the base of his penis for >12 h [Figure 1]. Several attempts to remove the ring in emergency department at two different hospitals failed, and finally, he was referred to our institution. He had extensive bruising and edema of the penile shaft distal to the ring. The shaft of his penis was Number on examination. Our initial attempt (with the patient under conscious sedation) to slide the ring off with compression and lubrication failed. The patient experienced such discomfort, for which general anesthesia was then induced. We then attempted needle aspiration and a release incision to decompress the corpora and decrease the swelling; however, this was not enough. Ultimately, we used a diamond-tipped Midas drill from the hospital engineering department to split the ring in half. During this procedure, a metal ruler and cold-water irrigation were used to protect soft tissues and prevent thermal injury. After ring removal, we performed flexible cystoscopy to rule out urethral injury. It revealed extensive urethral bruises, for which we placed 16 French Foley catheter [Figure 2]. The patient recovered and showed improvement at follow-up.
Figure 1

Patient 2 before treatment

Figure 2

Patient 2 after treatment

Patient 2 before treatment Patient 2 after treatment The third patient is a 42-year-old Caucasian male who presented with a metal washer pushed to the base of the penis. There were extensive bruises and edema distal to the washer. Attempts at twisting the ring off with lubrication were unsuccessful. Next, a vice clamp and Dremel tool were obtained from hospital maintenance. The ring was meticulously sawed in half as wet gauze and a tongue depressor were used as a barrier to protect the skin. Vice clamps were used to stabilize the ring. There was not any evidence of nother tissue injuries.

DISCUSSION

A penile ring is typically used to restrict the outflow of blood from the penis to prolonged erection and enhance sexual pleasure.[123] Wearing the ring for extended periods of time will lead to penile ischemia and strangulation. Eventually, the patient will experience severe edema, necrosis, urethral fistula, gangrene, penile amputation, and even death.[67] Patients tend to present late in their condition due to embarrassment.[6] Our experience was similar; unfortunately, delaying clinical intervention results in increased risk of the aforementioned complications of PRE.[8] The primary goal of management in these cases is to restore blood supply to the penis while preserving the integrity of penile and urethral tissue. Success depends on what method is used to remove the ring. There are multiple treatment approaches (sliding, cutting, and surgery) that have been reported in the literature; surgeons have used different tools depending on what is at their disposal and their experience [Table 1]. Cystoscopy may be performed after the intervention to assess the level or urethral injury.
Table 1

Summary of case reports on penile ring entrapment

ReferenceAgeDescription of penisDuration, ring materialTreatment method
Our patient-160Penis and scrotum, with edema2 days, metalOlive oil was applied and ring was slid off
Our patient-228Penis, marked edema with bruise12 h, metalRing was cut by diamond tip Midas drill
Our patient-342Penis, edemaMetalRing was cut via dermal tool using
Sawant et al.[3]70Penile edema without gangrene2 months, rubberRubber band was cut
Sawant et al.[3]23Penis, with distal edema and circumferential ulcer24 h, rubberBand was cut
Sawant et al.[3]42Mid penile shaft band with distal edema18 h, metalRing was cut using stout scissors
Sawant et al.[3]35Base of penis, with marked penile edema4 days, metalRing was cut by K-wire cutter
Alkhureeb[1]30Base of penis, penile edema, urinary retention8 h, metalBone cutter- failLateral corporotomy (surgery) to reduce edema, then ring was slid distally to the glans, then using proline 0 on glans, ring was removed
Nuhu et al.[2]60Penis, complete penile gangrene1 day, metal nutCystotomy and penile amputation with perineal urethrostomy (surgery)
Paonam et al.[9]47Penis, marked edema2 days, metalRing was cut by micrometer wheel-shaped bur
Nason et al.[10]Not specifiedPenoscrotal edema7 h titaniumBone cutter - fail Fire brigade department used an electric axel driver to cut the ring
Liu et al.[11]Not specifiedPreputial edemaUnknown time, PET bottleBottle removed with persistent suture traction and lubrication (sliding)
Sharma et al.[4]37Edema, areas of discoloration near base of penis5 days, metalRing was slid over penis by applying gentle traction over skin
Patel et al.[12]43Edema of penis and scrotum1 day, metalIndustrial bolt cutters to cut the ring
Agu et al.[6]26Penile shaft edematous, mildly tender, cold, sensate, and engorged23 h, stainless steal ringPenile shaft made slippery with salvon and advanced forward via sliding
Wu et al.[13]45Ring placed at base of genetalia, extensive penoscrotal edeam48 h, metal ringRing slide off with vascular slings
Sathesh-kumar et al.[14]50Root of scrotum, penoscrotal edema2 days, metal ringRing cut with pedal cutter from fire department
Patel et al.[15]45Not mentioned6 months, 2 metal-ringed hose clampsWire cutters from the orthopedic set were used to cut the metal clamps
Baruah et al.[16]17Gross penile edema with impaired penile sensation distal to ring17 h, metallic ring made of alloyRing was slide off
Geraniotis[17]45Penis was incarcerated at base of penis1 week, Barbell retaining (steel) ringGas driven nonsurgical drill used to cut the ring

PET: Polyethylene terephthalate

Summary of case reports on penile ring entrapment PET: Polyethylene terephthalate

Treatment options

Sliding: Sliding should be used as an initial approach. This is the safest way to preserve underlying tissue. Various lubricants have been reported such as Salvon and even olive oil. If the ring is slid, the surgeon must first compress the edematous tissue and then provide traction. This method was reported to be successful by other authors.[46111316] We performed this method and were successful with one of our patients. However, we were unsuccessful in two of our patients. This method is safest and quickest but clearly is not suitable for all cases Cutting: Cutting seems to be the next suitable option after sliding has been attempted. Cutting appears to be a highly sought out method by many surgeons.[391012141517] Various tools have been used to cut the ring such as a micrometer wheel-shaped bur, stout scissors, K-wire cutter, DerMel, bone-cutting clamp, and an electric axel driver.[3910] We successfully used a diamond-tipped Midas Drill and Dremel tool. However, if cutting is sought out, it is very important to protect the underlying tissue from mechanical and thermal injury. We used cold saline irrigation to prevent thermal injury and a tongue depressor to protect the skin and underlying tissue Surgery: With failure of other approaches, surgical options may be needed. Lateral corporotomy to release edema and facilitate subsequent removal with lubrication, as performed by Alkhureeb et al., is one surgical approach.[1] We resorted to a limited surgical approach in order to drain fluid from the corpora and skin, our thinking was this would allow the penis to become more compressible. However, we found this to be of little help. Nuhu et al. experienced and extreme case of penile gangrene and preformed a cystotomy and perennial urethrosotomy.[2] Fortunately, we did not experience such an intense and rare case.

Grading of penile entrapment

There are different classifications of penile entrapment that have been reported [Table 2]. Sawant et al. embrace a grading system originally described by Bashir and El-Barbary, which focuses on the consequences of penile strangulation and urethral injury not easily visible by examination.[319] Another grading system published by Bhat et al. utilizes penile sensation in its classification. This, however, could be misconstrued by patient anxiety and delivery of anesthesia by other providers prior to urologic assessment.[18] Regardless, both require detailed information that would be obtained accurately after the intervention.
Table 2

Summary of grading system

SystemGrade 0Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5
Sawant et al.[3]No urethral injuryPartial division of corpus spongiosum + urethrocutaneous fistulaComplete division of corpus spongiosum + constriction of corpus cavernosumGangrene and amputation
Bhat et al.[18]Edema distal to penisGrade 1 + decreased distal penile sensationGrade 1 + loss of distal penile sensationGrade 3 + complete separation of corpus cavernosaGangrene or amputation
OursSuperficial injury with distal edemaInjury to corpora or urethraGangrene, amputation, fistula, or separation of corpora
Summary of grading system We are proposing a revised grading system that is simpler to communicate, effective, and more pertinent to the problems surrounding PRE. Grade 1 is superficial tissue injury with distal edema. Grade 2 is any deep tissue injury involving the corpora or urethra assessed by examination, and Grade 3 is tissue loss, gangrene, separation of the corpora, or fistula. This grading scale is simple, depends mainly on clinical examination, and is easy to adopt by any emergency physician or urologist.

CONCLUSION

PRE is a rare, true urologic emergency that can lead to penile amputation. Management should be urgent and directed toward removing the ring while protecting underlying tissue. Treatment is based on the severity of the presentation and the tools at the physician's disposal. A grading system is helpful in communicating the degree of injury between health-care providers, but it is necessary that it is simple, quick, and easy to communicate. We feel we have achieved this goal.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  16 in total

1.  Re: Penile incarceration with barbell retaining ring.

Authors:  Evangelos G Geraniotis
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Prolonged penile strangulation with metal clamps.

Authors:  Chirag Patel; Richard Kim; Michael Delterzo; Run Wang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Penile strangulation.

Authors:  A L Bhat; A Kumar; S C Mathur; K C Gangwal
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1991-12

4.  Penile gangrene due to strangulation by a metallic nut: a case report.

Authors:  A Nuhu; S T Edino; G O Agbese; M Kallamu
Journal:  West Afr J Med       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct

5.  Hair coil strangulation of the penis.

Authors:  A Y Bashir; M El-Barbary
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1980-01

6.  Penoscrotal entrapment: a safe, innovative technique for removing metal constricting devices.

Authors:  Xilin Wu; Ramesh Batra; Mahmoud Al-Akraa; Lasantha Niroshan Seneviratne
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-09-25

Review 7.  Extrication of penile entrapment in a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottle: a technique of suture traction and Dundee and literature review.

Authors:  Guang-Ming Liu; Guang Sun; Hong-Shun Ma
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Penile strangulation by iron metal ring: A novel and effective method of management.

Authors:  Somorendro Paonam; Nillachandra Kshetrimayum; Indrajit Rana
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

9.  Penile and Scrotal Strangulation due to Metal Rings: Case Reports and a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Neel H Patel; Ariel Schulman; Jonathan Bloom; Nikil Uppaluri; Michael Iorga; Suraj Parikh; John Phillips; Muhammad Choudhury
Journal:  Case Rep Surg       Date:  2018-03-27

10.  An innovative surgical technique for treating penile incarceration injury caused by heavy metallic ring.

Authors:  S J Baruah; P K Bagchi; S K Barua; P M Deka
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009-04
View more
  3 in total

1.  Penile Entrapment With Thick Penile Ring: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Mohamed Zeid; Hani Sayedin; Nauman Nabi; Mamoun Abdelrahman; Prem T Jacob
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-08

Review 2.  Use of dental drill handpiece to remove steel nut causing penile strangulation: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Tuan Thanh Nguyen; Xuan Thai Ngo; Quy Thuan Chau; Khac Chuan Hoang; Le Quy Van Dinh; Hoai Tam Ly; Tien Dat Hoang; Ryan W Dobbs; Minh Sam Thai
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2022-04-19

3.  Management of prolonged penile ring entrapment in an Indonesian tertiary hospital: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Anak Agung Patriana Puspaningrat; Yudhistira Pradnyan Kloping; Johan Renaldo
Journal:  Urol Case Rep       Date:  2022-09-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.