Literature DB >> 32014860

Phenotypic expansion of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa associated with the D477G mutation in RPE65.

Ruben Jauregui1,2,3, Ahra Cho1,2,4, Jin Kyun Oh1,2,5, Akemi J Tanaka6, Janet R Sparrow1,2,6, Stephen H Tsang1,2,6.   

Abstract

Mutations in the gene RPE65 (OMIM: 180069) are recessively inherited and known to cause Leber congenital amaurosis. Recently, the mutation D477G in RPE65 has been identified as a cause of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (RP). Variable expressivity of this disease has been reported, as carrier individuals can present with mild, nonpenetrant, or, most commonly, a severe chorioretinal phenotype that resembles choroideremia. We report the case of a 57-yr-old male who presented to our clinic with nyctalopia and decreasing visual acuity for 1 yr. Dilated fundus examination revealed retinal atrophy and peripheral mottling of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). SW-AF revealed patchy hypoautofluorescence throughout the posterior pole with separate lacunae-like areas in the macula of severe RPE atrophy along with foveal sparing. Full-field electroretinogram suggested a rod-cone dystrophy. Whole-exome sequencing revealed the heterozygous mutation c.1430A > G (p.D477G) in the RPE65 gene. This phenotype of peripheral RPE mottling and severe macular lacunae-like atrophy has not been previously reported with RPE65 autosomal dominant RP, supporting the variable expressivity of the disease and expanding the known phenotypic presentations.
© 2020 Jauregui et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  congenital blindness; congenital visual impairment; decreased central vision

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32014860      PMCID: PMC6996519          DOI: 10.1101/mcs.a004952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud        ISSN: 2373-2873


INTRODUCTION

Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) refers to a group of retinal dystrophies that is a major cause of visual disability worldwide, with a prevalence of ∼1 in 4000 for an estimated total of 1.5 million patients (Verbakel et al. 2018). The disease is caused in most cases by a primary degeneration of the rod photoreceptors followed by the cones, and thus is characterized as a rod–cone dystrophy (Hamel 2006; Hartong et al. 2006; Verbakel et al. 2018). The typical course of the disease for patients is initial nyctalopia, followed by progressive constriction of the visual fields and “tunneling” of vision. Macular function is preserved until late stages of the disease. On clinical examination, fundus abnormalities include intraretinal bone spicule pigment migration, attenuation of the retina vessels, and waxy pallor of the optic nerve. Disease severity generally depends on the Mendelian mode of inheritance: X-linked RP (5%–15% of patients) has a more severe course of disease as compared to autosomal recessive RP (50%–60%), whereas autosomal dominant RP (30%–40%) is generally the mildest (Hamel 2006; Hartong et al. 2006; Verbakel et al. 2018; Jauregui et al. 2019b). Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) refers to a group of rod–cone dystrophies that present congenitally or within the first months of life with severe vision loss, nystagmus, and extinguished electroretinogram responses in most cases (Kumaran et al. 2017; Jauregui et al. 2018a; Sheck et al. 2018). LCA is inherited in an autosomal recessive manner, and ∼5%–10% of cases are caused by pathogenic variants in the gene retinal pigment epithelium (RPE)-specific protein 65 kDa (RPE65, OMIM: 180069) (Kumaran et al. 2017). This gene encodes for a retinol isomerase that serves as a vital component of the visual cycle by regenerating 11-cis-retinol from all-trans-retinyl ester (Shin et al. 2017). Recently, RPE65-LCA became the first retinal dystrophy to have Federal Drug Administration (FDA)-approved gene therapy after successful results from safety and efficacy studies (Russell et al. 2017). In 2011, Bowne et al. (2011) reported the first study of the heterozygous RPE65 p.D477G variant causing autosomal dominant RP (adRP) in two Irish families. Further reports have shown that RPE65-adRP can present with chorioretinal atrophy resembling choroideremia (Bowne et al. 2011; Hull et al. 2016; Jauregui et al. 2018b). Nonpenetrance and mild disease have also been reported (Bowne et al. 2011; Hull et al. 2016). In this study, we describe a patient with the variant p.D477G in RPE65 who presented with a novel phenotype that has not been previously associated with this variant.

RESULTS

A 57-yr-old male patient was referred to our office for a retinal evaluation. The patient reported a subjective decrease in visual acuity beginning ∼1 yr earlier with objects appearing “blurry” as well as decreased vision in low-light environments. Medical and ocular history were otherwise noncontributory. The patient's mother has a diagnosis of age-related macular degeneration, but there is no family history of vision problems similar to those of the patient. On examination, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/50 bilaterally. Dilated fundus examination revealed widespread mottling of the RPE in the periphery, with more delineated areas of RPE atrophy centrally but with foveal sparing (Fig. 1A,B). Short-wave autofluorescence (SW-AF) imaging supported the findings from fundus examination. Patchy hypoautofluorescence was observed throughout the posterior pole of both eyes. In the right eye, multiple areas of RPE atrophy were observed on the macula, whereas in the left eye, there was only one similar area (Fig. 1C,D). The fovea was spared bilaterally. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) scans revealed that in the areas of RPE atrophy, the ellipsoid zone (EZ) line and the underlying RPE and Bruch's membrane layers had degenerated, leading to a collapse of the overlying retinal layers (Fig. 1E,F). Outer retinal tubulations were also appreciated in the areas of atrophy (Fig. 1E). The retinal layers were conserved in the fovea. On full-field electroretinography (ff-ERG), the scotopic rod-specific responses were extinguished. Maximal responses exhibited a- and b-wave amplitudes of 87 µV and 74 µV in the right and 106 µV and 105 µV in the left eye. Photopic 30-Hz flicker amplitudes were diminished to 62 µV on the right and 48 µV on the left eye. Genetic testing via whole-exome sequencing (WES) revealed the variant c.1430A > G (p.D477G) in the gene RPE65. No other additional variants were found.
Figure 1.

Clinical examination of the presented patient. Dilated fundus examination of the right eye (A) revealed widespread mottling of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) in the periphery. More delineated areas of RPE atrophy are observed centrally with the underlying white sclera visible. RPE mottling and atrophy is also observed in the left eye (B) but to a lesser degree as compared to the right eye. There is sparing of the fovea bilaterally. Short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence of the right (C) and left (D) eyes revealed patchy hypoautofluorescence throughout the posterior pole. In the right eye, multiple areas of deep hypoautofluorescence corresponding to RPE atrophy were observed surrounding the fovea, whereas on the left eye there was only one such area. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) scans and concurrently registered infrared images of the right (E) and left (F) eyes revealed that these lacunae-like, hypoautofluorescence areas correspond to regions where the ellipsoid zone (EZ) line and the underlying RPE and Bruch's membrane layers had degenerated, leading to a collapse of the overlying retinal layers (the boundaries are marked by red lines on the infrared image and by red arrows on the SD-OCT scan). Outer retinal tubulations are also appreciated (yellow arrowhead), suggesting photoreceptor and outer retinal degeneration. Outside of these areas of RPE atrophy, the retinal layers are intact.

Clinical examination of the presented patient. Dilated fundus examination of the right eye (A) revealed widespread mottling of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) in the periphery. More delineated areas of RPE atrophy are observed centrally with the underlying white sclera visible. RPE mottling and atrophy is also observed in the left eye (B) but to a lesser degree as compared to the right eye. There is sparing of the fovea bilaterally. Short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence of the right (C) and left (D) eyes revealed patchy hypoautofluorescence throughout the posterior pole. In the right eye, multiple areas of deep hypoautofluorescence corresponding to RPE atrophy were observed surrounding the fovea, whereas on the left eye there was only one such area. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) scans and concurrently registered infrared images of the right (E) and left (F) eyes revealed that these lacunae-like, hypoautofluorescence areas correspond to regions where the ellipsoid zone (EZ) line and the underlying RPE and Bruch's membrane layers had degenerated, leading to a collapse of the overlying retinal layers (the boundaries are marked by red lines on the infrared image and by red arrows on the SD-OCT scan). Outer retinal tubulations are also appreciated (yellow arrowhead), suggesting photoreceptor and outer retinal degeneration. Outside of these areas of RPE atrophy, the retinal layers are intact.

DISCUSSION

The severe chorioretinal phenotype of RPE65-adRP caused exclusively by the D477G variant was first described in two Irish families in which the disease exhibited intrafamilial phenotypic variability (Bowne et al. 2011). In contrast to severe disease with extensive chorioretinal atrophy, nonpenetrance, and mild disease with peripheral pigment migration were also observed in some individuals (Bowne et al. 2011). Similarly, two different families in which both nonpenetrance and severe choroidal disease were observed have been reported (Hull et al. 2016). In addition, our group published a 2-yr follow-up study on a patient also afflicted with adRP caused by the same previously reported D477G variant in RPE65 (Jauregui et al. 2018b). Based on these studies, the severe chorioretinal phenotype associated with D477G RPE65-adRP can best be described as resembling choroideremia (Fig. 2). On fundoscopy, extensive chorioretinal atrophy is observed throughout the posterior pole, whereas in SW-AF images, there is extensive loss of autofluorescence in the areas of RPE atrophy, with scalloped regions of preserved retina and RPE. Unlike choroideremia, however, disease onset appears in adulthood for most patients with RPE65-adRP.
Figure 2.

Clinical examinations of a patient with choroideremia and a patient with the classical phenotype of RPE65 autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Dilated fundus examination (A) and short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence (SW-AF) imaging (B) of a 20-yr-old patient with choroideremia caused by the mutation c.1584_1587del (p.V529Hfs*7) in the gene CHM. Fundoscopy reveals chorioretinal atrophy, with the underlying white sclera visible on some areas of the posterior pole. On SW-AF, there is extensive loss of autofluorescence in the areas of RPE atrophy along with scalloped regions of preserved retina. The classically described phenotype of RPE65-autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (adRP) resembles choroideremia. On dilated fundus examination (C) and SW-AF imaging (D) of a 69-yr-old patient with adRP caused by the mutation c.1430A > G (p.D477G) in RPE65, chorioretinal atrophy and scalloped regions of preserved retina in SW-AF images can be appreciated, thus resembling the phenotype observed in choroideremia.

Clinical examinations of a patient with choroideremia and a patient with the classical phenotype of RPE65 autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Dilated fundus examination (A) and short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence (SW-AF) imaging (B) of a 20-yr-old patient with choroideremia caused by the mutation c.1584_1587del (p.V529Hfs*7) in the gene CHM. Fundoscopy reveals chorioretinal atrophy, with the underlying white sclera visible on some areas of the posterior pole. On SW-AF, there is extensive loss of autofluorescence in the areas of RPE atrophy along with scalloped regions of preserved retina. The classically described phenotype of RPE65-autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (adRP) resembles choroideremia. On dilated fundus examination (C) and SW-AF imaging (D) of a 69-yr-old patient with adRP caused by the mutation c.1430A > G (p.D477G) in RPE65, chorioretinal atrophy and scalloped regions of preserved retina in SW-AF images can be appreciated, thus resembling the phenotype observed in choroideremia. The patient we report in this study presents with a novel phenotype that has not been previously attributed to RPE65-adRP. In our patient, we observed RPE mottling by fundoscopy and patchy hypoautofluorescence in SW-AF imaging instead of severe chorioretinal atrophy of the posterior pole. Furthermore, our patient exhibits macular lacunae–like lesions of severe RPE atrophy with foveal sparing. In the areas of atrophy, outer retinal tubulations are appreciated, suggesting photoreceptor and outer retinal degeneration (Zweifel et al. 2009). Phenotypes similar to our patient's have previously been reported in female carriers of choroideremia, suggesting that RPE65-adRP can resemble either choroideremia in males or the carrier choroideremia state in females (Edwards et al. 2015; Jauregui et al. 2019a). In conjunction with previous reports, our study serves to illustrate that there is phenotypic variability of the D477G variant causing RPE65-adRP. Variable expressivity and incomplete penetrance are more common with adRP, and this phenomenon occurs in other genes that cause adRP such as PRPF8 and PRPF31 (Hamel 2006; Maubaret et al. 2011; Rose and Bhattacharya 2016). The mechanism of pathogenicity of the D477G mutation has been explored by multiple studies. Initially, Bowne et al. (2011) proposed that the variant might destabilize folding of the tertiary RPE65 protein structure. A later study by Shin et al. used mutant knock-in mice and showed that D477G acts as a dominant negative mutation of RPE65 and causes a delay in the chromophore regeneration of the visual cycle (Shin et al. 2017). Choi et al. later demonstrated that the amino acid substitution is a toxic gain-of-function mutation, rather than a disturbance to protein folding or tertiary structure (Choi et al. 2018). Nevertheless, the most recent study on the mechanism of RPE65-adRP reported that D477G causes aberrant RNA splicing to create the pathogenic effect in humans and does not result in a gain-of-function mutation (Li et al. 2019). Similar to D477G RPE65-adRP, other genes that are known to cause variable expressivity and incomplete penetrance are also involved in RNA processing, such as PRPF8 and PRPF31 (Maubaret et al. 2011; Rose and Bhattacharya 2016). The variable expressivity of the D477G mutation, including nonpenetrance in some carriers, suggests that there might be additional mutations or modifier effects by other genes. Therefore, it is integral to perform further genomic analysis to help elucidate possible linkage of multiple genes involved in the pathogenicity of this mutation. In conclusion, this study expands the currently known phenotypic presentations of adRP caused by the D477G mutation in RPE65. This study also serves to increase awareness of the variable phenotypic presentations of RPE65-retinopathy. In patients in which phenotypic presentation suggests choroideremia or a choroideremia carrier state but targeted sequencing of the gene CHM is negative, sequencing of RPE65 should be pursued.

METHODS

Subjects and Ophthalmic Evaluation

Ophthalmic evaluation of the patient included measurement of best corrected visual acuity, pupillary dilation (>7 mm) followed by fundus examination, photography, SD-OCT, and SW-AF (488 nm). ff-ERG was performed using DTL recording electrodes and Ganzfeld stimulation according to the standards from the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV) (McCulloch et al. 2015a,b).

DNA Analysis

DNA was obtained from the patient's peripheral blood to perform clinical WES. WES was performed using SureSelectXT Human All Exon V5 + UTRs (Agilent Technologies) capture and HiSeq2500 (Illumina) sequencing technology. Sequence reads obtained were analyzed for the presence of pathogenic mutations by alignment to the human genome reference sequence (GRCh37/hg19) using the NextGENe software (Softgenetics) and our own analytical pipeline at the Laboratory of Personalized Genomic Medicine at Columbia University (Nagy and Mansukhani 2015). Identified variants were assessed for clinical phenotypic match and classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants (Kalia et al. 2017). Variant information is provided in Table 1; sequencing coverage data is provided in Table 2.
Table 1.

Variant table for the RPE65 c.1430A > G (p.Asp477Gly) variant

GeneChromosomeHGVS DNA referenceHGVS protein referenceVariant typePredicted effectdbSNP/dbVar IDGenotype
RPE65Chr 1:68896768T > C (GRCh37/hg19)c.1430A > Gp.Asp477GlyMissenseSubstitutionNot availableHeterozygous
Table 2.

Whole-exome sequencing coverage table for the RPE65 c.1430A > G (p.Asp477Gly) variant

SamplePercentage of reads alignedAverage read coveragePercentage of RPE65 sites (2605 bases) with ≥10× coverage
Proband97.28%146.72100
Variant table for the RPE65 c.1430A > G (p.Asp477Gly) variant Whole-exome sequencing coverage table for the RPE65 c.1430A > G (p.Asp477Gly) variant

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Data Deposition and Access

Whole-exome sequencing data is not publicly available as our patient consent does not permit the data to be uploaded to a depository. Patient consent could not be obtained. The NM_000329.3(RPE65):c.1430A > G (p.D477G) variant can be accessed through OMIM Allelic Variant 180069.0013.

Ethics Statement

This study is in accordance to the tenets from the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Columbia University Medical Center. Informed consent was obtained from the patients as outlined by the IRB protocol #AAAR0284. As per a retrospective study with no more than a minimal risk for the subject, this study did not require written consent by IRB policies.

Acknowledgments

Thanks and appreciation are extended to the patient described for the willingness to participate.

Author Contributions

R.J., J.R.S., and S.H.T. conceived the study design. R.J., A.C., A.J.T., and J.K.O. wrote the manuscript text. R.J. and A.C. gathered data and images for the study. J.R.S. and S.H.T. supervised the study and provided resources. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Jonas Children's Vision Care and Bernard & Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Laboratory are supported by the National Institutes of Health (P30EY019007, R01EY018213, R01EY024698, R01EY024091, R01EY026682, R21AG050437), Foundation Fighting Blindness (TA-NMT-0116-0692-COLU), National Cancer Institute Core (5P30CA013696), and the Research to Prevent Blindness (RPB) Physician-Scientist Award.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.
  23 in total

Review 1.  Retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Dyonne T Hartong; Eliot L Berson; Thaddeus P Dryja
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-11-18       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Efficacy and safety of voretigene neparvovec (AAV2-hRPE65v2) in patients with RPE65-mediated inherited retinal dystrophy: a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Stephen Russell; Jean Bennett; Jennifer A Wellman; Daniel C Chung; Zi-Fan Yu; Amy Tillman; Janet Wittes; Julie Pappas; Okan Elci; Sarah McCague; Dominique Cross; Kathleen A Marshall; Jean Walshire; Taylor L Kehoe; Hannah Reichert; Maria Davis; Leslie Raffini; Lindsey A George; F Parker Hudson; Laura Dingfield; Xiaosong Zhu; Julia A Haller; Elliott H Sohn; Vinit B Mahajan; Wanda Pfeifer; Michelle Weckmann; Chris Johnson; Dina Gewaily; Arlene Drack; Edwin Stone; Katie Wachtel; Francesca Simonelli; Bart P Leroy; J Fraser Wright; Katherine A High; Albert M Maguire
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Outer retinal tubulation: a novel optical coherence tomography finding.

Authors:  Sandrine A Zweifel; Michael Engelbert; Ketan Laud; Ron Margolis; Richard F Spaide; K Bailey Freund
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-12

4.  The role of clinical genomic testing in diagnosis and discovery of pathogenic mutations.

Authors:  Peter L Nagy; Mahesh Mansukhani
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 5.225

5.  Autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa with intrafamilial variability and incomplete penetrance in two families carrying mutations in PRPF8.

Authors:  Cécilia G Maubaret; Veronika Vaclavik; Rajarshi Mukhopadhyay; Naushin H Waseem; Amanda Churchill; Graham E Holder; Anthony T Moore; Shomi S Bhattacharya; Andrew R Webster
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 6.  Caring for Hereditary Childhood Retinal Blindness.

Authors:  Ruben Jauregui; Galaxy Y Cho; Vitor K L Takahashi; Julia T Takiuti; Alexander G Bassuk; Vinit B Mahajan; Stephen H Tsang
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2018-03-14

Review 7.  Variant haploinsufficiency and phenotypic non-penetrance in PRPF31-associated retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  A M Rose; S S Bhattacharya
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 8.  Leber congenital amaurosis/early-onset severe retinal dystrophy: clinical features, molecular genetics and therapeutic interventions.

Authors:  Neruban Kumaran; Anthony T Moore; Richard G Weleber; Michel Michaelides
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Multimodal structural disease progression of retinitis pigmentosa according to mode of inheritance.

Authors:  Ruben Jauregui; Vitor K L Takahashi; Karen Sophia Park; Xuan Cui; Julia T Takiuti; Jose Ronaldo Lima de Carvalho; Stephen H Tsang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Leber Congenital Amaurosis Associated with Mutations in CEP290, Clinical Phenotype, and Natural History in Preparation for Trials of Novel Therapies.

Authors:  Leo Sheck; Wayne I L Davies; Phillip Moradi; Anthony G Robson; Neruban Kumaran; Alki C Liasis; Andrew R Webster; Anthony T Moore; Michel Michaelides
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Perspective: Treating RPE65-Associated Retinal Dystrophy.

Authors:  Albert M Maguire; Jean Bennett; Elena M Aleman; Bart P Leroy; Tomas S Aleman
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 11.454

2.  Novel RCBTB1 variants causing later-onset non-syndromic retinal dystrophy with macular chorioretinal atrophy.

Authors:  Andrew J Catomeris; Brian G Ballios; Riccardo Sangermano; Naomi E Wagner; Jason I Comander; Eric A Pierce; Emily M Place; Kinga M Bujakowska; Rachel M Huckfeldt
Journal:  Ophthalmic Genet       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 1.274

Review 3.  Retinal pigment epithelium 65 kDa protein (RPE65): An update.

Authors:  Philip D Kiser
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2021-10-02       Impact factor: 19.704

Review 4.  Properties and Therapeutic Implications of an Enigmatic D477G RPE65 Variant Associated with Autosomal Dominant Retinitis Pigmentosa.

Authors:  Anna-Sophia Kiang; Paul F Kenna; Marian M Humphries; Ema Ozaki; Robert K Koenekoop; Matthew Campbell; G Jane Farrar; Pete Humphries
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.096

5.  Molecular genetics of inherited retinal degenerations in Icelandic patients.

Authors:  Daniel A Thorsteinsson; Vigdis Stefansdottir; Thor Eysteinsson; Sigridur Thorisdottir; Jon J Jonsson
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 4.438

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.