Literature DB >> 32014777

Matching times: Trying to improve the correlation between heavy metal levels in mosses and bulk deposition.

M T Boquete1, A Ares2, J A Fernández3, J R Aboal3.   

Abstract

The relationship between the concentrations of metals in moss tissues and atmospheric deposition is highly complex, resulting in a general lack of correlations between these two matrices. Here, we tried to improve the significance of the moss-bulk deposition (BD) relationship by eliminating the mismatch between the time that the moss tissue selected for analysis is exposed to atmospheric deposition, and the time during which BD is collected. For this, we analysed the concentrations of Cd, Hg and Pb in new grown tissue of Pseudoscleropodium purum and BD collected monthly, for one year, in 21 sampling sites (SS) under different degrees of pollution. Additionally, we assessed how different moss tissues, including native moss (green parts and new grown tissues of P. purum) and moss transplants of Sphagnum denticulatum, reflect BD to find out which moss tissues provide a better estimate of the atmospheric deposition of heavy metals. First of all, our results showed that eliminating the mismatch between native moss exposure time and BD collection period is not enough to improve their correlation. Environmental variation emerged as the main driver of tissue content variation altering the moss-BD relationship unpredictably. Secondly, native P. purum represents BD values better than devitalized transplants by displaying a greater number of significant correlations with BD. Specifically, green parts of P. purum generally represent better BD than new grown tissues. Overall, we conclude that neither native mosses nor transplants are good estimators of atmospheric heavy metal deposition rates. However, they are good qualitative indicators of the atmospheric deposition, by allowing us to differentiate SS subject to a wide range of pollution levels. Additionally, green parts of P. purum, and likely of other mosses with similar growth forms, should be used in passive biomonitoring studies to make results from different studies comparable.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air pollution; Cadmium; Lead; Mercury; Passive and active biomonitoring

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32014777     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  1 in total

1.  Is Active Moss Biomonitoring Comparable to Air Filter Standard Sampling?

Authors:  Paweł Świsłowski; Arkadiusz Nowak; Stanisław Wacławek; Zbigniew Ziembik; Małgorzata Rajfur
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.614

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.