Literature DB >> 32014650

Preschoolers refer to direct and indirect evidence in their collaborative reasoning.

Bahar Köymen1, Solveig Jurkat2, Michael Tomasello3.   

Abstract

Collaborative reasoning requires partners to evaluate options and the evidence for or against each option. We investigated whether preschoolers can explain why one option is best (direct reasons) and why the other option is not (indirect reasons), looking at both problems that have a correct answer and those that require choosing the better option. In Study 1, both age groups produced direct reasons equally frequently in both problems. However, 5-year-olds produced indirect reasons more often than 3-year-olds, especially when there was a correct answer. In Study 2 with a nonverbal task with a correct answer, 3-year-olds produced indirect reasons more often than in Study 1, although 5-year-olds' indirect reasons were more efficiently stated. These results demonstrate that even 3-year-olds, and even nonverbally, can point out to a partner a fact that constitutes a reason for them to arrive at a correct joint decision.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Collaborative decision-making; Direct/indirect evidence; Nonverbal reason-giving; Peer interactions; Reasoning; Reasoning by exclusion

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32014650     DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0965


  1 in total

Review 1.  Good-enough language production.

Authors:  Adele E Goldberg; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 24.482

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.