Literature DB >> 32014323

Long-term durability of bioprosthetic valves in pulmonary position: Pericardial versus porcine valves.

Jae Gun Kwak1, Ji Hyun Bang2, Sungkyu Cho3, Eung Re Kim3, Beatrice Chia-Hui Shih2, Chang-Ha Lee3, Woong-Han Kim2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The long-term durability of the 2 most commonly used types of bioprosthetic valves in the pulmonic position, the porcine and pericardial valves, is unclear. We compared the long-term durability of the pericardial (Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT [CE]) and porcine (Hancock II) valves in the pulmonic position in patients with congenital cardiac anomalies.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 258 cases (248 patients) of pulmonary valve implantation or replacement using CE (129 cases, group CE) or porcine (129 cases, group H) valves from 2 institutions between 2001 and 2009.
RESULTS: The patients' age at pulmonary valve implantation was 14.9 ± 8.7 years. No significant differences in perioperative characteristics were observed between groups CE and H. Follow-up data were complete in 219 cases (84.9%) and the median follow-up duration was 10.5 (interquartile range, 8.4∼13.0) years. Ten mortalities (3.9%) occurred. Sixty-four patients underwent reoperation for pulmonary valve replacement due to prosthetic valve failure; 10 of these 64 patients underwent reoperation during the study period. Patients in group CE were significantly more likely to undergo reoperation (hazard ratio, 2.17; confidence interval, 1.26-3.72; P = .005) than patients in group H. Patients in group CE showed had a greater prosthetic valve dysfunction (moderate-to-severe pulmonary regurgitation or pulmonary stenosis with ≥3.5 m/s peak velocity through the prosthetic pulmonary valve) rate (hazard ratio, 1.83; confidence interval, 1.07-3.14; P = .027) than patients in group H.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the pericardial valve, the porcine valve had long-term advantages in terms of reduced reoperation rate and prosthetic valve dysfunction in the pulmonic position in patients with congenital cardiac anomalies.
Copyright © 2019 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioprosthetic valve; congenital heart disease; implantation; pulmonary valve; pulmonary valve replacement; right ventricular outflow tract

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32014323     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.11.134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  3 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of pulmonary valve reconstruction with focused review of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene handmade valves.

Authors:  Te-I Chang; Kang-Hong Hsu; Shao-Jung Li; Min-Kai Chuang; Chi-Wen Luo; Yi-Jen Chen; Chung-I Chang
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-04-19

2.  Beyond the Valve: Lifelong Management of Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Lesion in Adult Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Chang-Ha Lee
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 3.101

3.  A Bicentric Propensity Matched Analysis of 158 Patients Comparing Porcine Versus Bovine Stented Bioprosthetic Valves in Pulmonary Position.

Authors:  Bunty Ramchandani; Raúl Sánchez; Juvenal Rey; Luz Polo; Álvaro Gonzalez; Maria-Jesús Lamas; Tomasa Centella; Jesús Díez; Ángel Aroca
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.101

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.