Literature DB >> 32014274

Geneva Statement on Heritable Human Genome Editing: The Need for Course Correction.

Roberto Andorno1, Françoise Baylis2, Marcy Darnovsky3, Donna Dickenson4, Hille Haker5, Katie Hasson6, Leah Lowthorp7, George J Annas8, Catherine Bourgain9, Katherine Drabiak10, Sigrid Graumann11, Katrin Grüber12, Matthias Kaiser13, David King14, Regine Kollek15, Calum MacKellar16, Jing-Bao Nie17, Osagie K Obasogie18, Mirriam Tyebally Fang19, Gabriele Werner-Felmayer20, Jana Zuscinova21.   

Abstract

As public interest advocates, policy experts, bioethicists, and scientists, we call for a course correction in public discussions about heritable human genome editing. Clarifying misrepresentations, centering societal consequences and concerns, and fostering public empowerment will support robust, global public engagement and meaningful deliberation about altering the genes of future generations.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  embryo; ethics; genome editing; germline; public engagement

Mesh：

Year:  2020        PMID： 32014274     DOI： 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Biotechnol        ISSN： 0167-7799            Impact factor:   19.536


  6 in total

1.  Setting ethical limits on human gene editing after the fall of the somatic/germline barrier.

Authors:  John H Evans
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  20 Years of Legislation - How Australia Has Responded to the Challenge of Regulating Genetically Modified Organisms in the Clinic.

Authors:  Gabrielle M O'Sullivan; Joshua G Philips; Heidi J Mitchell; Michael Dornbusch; John E J Rasko
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-10

3.  Germline genome modification through novel political, ethical, and social lenses.

Authors:  Vicki Xafis; G Owen Schaefer; Markus K Labude; Yujia Zhu; Soren Holm; Roger Sik-Yin Foo; Poh San Lai; Ruth Chadwick
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 5.917

4.  Changes in opinions about human germline gene editing as a result of the Dutch DNA-dialogue project.

Authors:  Diewertje Houtman; Boy Vijlbrief; Marike Polak; Jacqueline Pot; Petra Verhoef; Martina Cornel; Sam Riedijk
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 5.351

Review 5.  New Insights into the Therapeutic Applications of CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Munazza Ahmed; Grace Hope Daoud; Asmaa Mohamed; Rania Harati
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.096

6.  Enhancing the collectivist critique: accounts of the human enhancement debate.

Authors:  Tess Johnson
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2021-06-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.