| Literature DB >> 32013252 |
Yuika Onami1, Takayasu Kawasaki2, Hiroki Aizawa1, Tomoyuki Haraguchi1, Takashiro Akitsu1, Koichi Tsukiyama1,2, Mauricio A Palafox3.
Abstract
A salen-type Schiff base Zn(II) complex included in human serum albumin (HSA) protein was examined by UV-Vis, circular dichroism (CD), and fluorescence (PL) spectra. The formation of the composite material was also estimated by a GOLD program of ligand-protein docking simulation. A composite cast film of HSA and Zn(II) complex was prepared, and the effects of the docking of the metal complex on the degradation of protein molecules by mid-infrared free electron laser (IR-FEL) were investigated. The optimum wavelengths of IR-FEL irradiation to be used were based on experimental FT-IR spectra and vibrational analysis. Using TD-DFT results with 6-31G(d,p) and B3LYP, the IR spectrum of Zn(II) complex could be reasonably assigned. The respective wavelengths were 1652 cm-1 (HSA amide I), 1537 cm-1 (HSA amide II), and 1622 cm-1 (Zn(II) complex C=N). Degradation of HSA based on FT-IR microscope (IRM) analysis and protein secondary structure analysis program (IR-SSE) revealed that the composite material was degraded more than pure HSA or Zn(II) complex; the inclusion of Zn(II) complex enhanced destabilization of folding of HSA.Entities:
Keywords: IR-FEL; Schiff base; TD-DFT; Zn(II) complex; fluorescence; human serum albumin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32013252 PMCID: PMC7037271 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21030874
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Scheme 1Molecular structures of ZnL and HSA+ZnL hybrid material with the concept of the study or IR-FEL irradiation.
Figure 1UV-Vis spectra of HSA+ZnL (blue), HSA (orange), and ZnL (green). The red and pink broken lines indicate π-π* and n-π* bands, respectively.
Figure 2CD spectra of (a) HSA and (b) HSA+ZnL.
Figure 3Fluorescence spectra of (a) ZnL (λex = 360 nm), (b) ZnL (λex = 284 nm), (c) HSA (λex = 286 nm), and (d) HSA+ZnL (λex = 285 nm). Circles and arrows depict an explanation of FRET (see text).
Figure 4Fluorescence 2D contour plots of (a) ZnL, (b) HSA, and (c) HSA+ZnL.
Figure 5(Left) Labeling of the atoms in the optimal form of ZnL by MP2. (Right) side view of ZnL.
Geometrical parameters, bond lengths (in Å), and angles (in degrees) calculated with the B3LYP and MP2 methods and the 6-31G(d,p) basis set in ZnL.
| Parameters | B3LYP | MP2 | Parameters | B3LYP | MP2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.909 | 1.894 | 170.8 | 169.0 |
Calculated natural bond orbital (NBO) atomic charges with the B3LYP and MP2 methods in ZnL.
| Atom | B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) | MP2/6-31G(d,p) |
|---|---|---|
| O | −0.765 | −0.908 |
Theoretical computed total energies (A.U.), zero-point energies (ZPE) (kJ mol−1), rotational constants (GHz), entropies (J·mol−1 K−1), and dipole moments (Debye) calculated with the B3LYP and MP2 methods in ZnL.
| Parameter | B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) | MP2/6-31G(d,p) | Parameter | B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) | MP2/6-31G(d,p) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total energy+ ZPE | −2696.352240 | −2692.542175 | Entropy: Total | 140.47 | |
Figure 6Experimental IR spectrum in KBr and scaled at the B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level of ZnL in the 3500–2200 cm−1 range.
Figure 7Experimental (above) IR spectrum in KBr and scaled (middle and below) at the B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level of ZnL in the 1800–400 cm−1 range.
Comparison of the obtained wavenumbers and characterization obtained in the ZnL molecule at the B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level.
| Theoretical | Experimental | Characterization | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| νcal | A | Aa | µ | f | νscal, b | νexp | |
| 462.2 | 28 | 2 | 5.7 | 0.72 | 457 | 458 w | 70%, δ(ZnO2N2 group) |
| 476.4 | 11 | 1 | 4.2 | 0.56 | 471 | 472 w | 43%, δ(ZnO2N2 group) +30%, 16b γ(CCC) in benzene ring |
| 598.1 | 2 | 0 | 5.6 | 1.19 | 590 | 594 m | 70% δs(O–Zn–O) + 20%, 6a δ(CCC) in benzene ring |
| 610.2 | 67 | 5 | 8.3 | 1.82 | 602 | 588 m | 73% δas(O–Zn–O) + 20%, 6a δ(CCC) in benzene ring |
| 624.7 | 2 | 0 | 5.7 | 1.30 | 616 | 618 m | 43% δ(O–Zn–O) + 30%, 6a δ(CCC) in benzene ring |
| 676.8 | 3 | 0 | 4.4 | 1.19 | 667 | 671 m ? | 40%, δ(C–C–N) + 30%, 6a δ(CCC) in benzene ring |
| 752.2 | 0 | 0 | 2.9 | 0.98 | 741 | 739 m | 83%, 6b γ(CCC) in benzene ring |
| 766.6 | 66 | 5 | 1.4 | 0.48 | 756 | 749 s | 95%, 11 γ(C–H) in benzene ring |
| 766.7 | 23 | 2 | 1.4 | 0.48 | 756 | 761 m | 95%, 11 γ(C–H) in benzene ring |
| 804.6 | 17 | 1 | 4.4 | 1.67 | 793 | 793 m | 35% ν(OZnO)+25% δ(CCO)+20% δ(CCC) in benzene ring |
| 852.8 | 0 | 0 | 3.5 | 1.50 | 840 | 844 w | 60% δ(C–N) + 25% δ(O–Zn–O) |
| 870.9 | 10 | 1 | 1.6 | 0.71 | 858 | 850 m | 90%, 17b γ(C–H) in benzene ring |
| 914.5 | 60 | 5 | 5.6 | 2.77 | 901 | 905 m | 60%, 12 δ(CCC) + 30%, δ(C–O) |
| 942.3 | 1 | 0 | 1.3 | 0.68 | 928 | 937 m | 85%, 17a γ(C–H) in benzene ring |
| 1055.4 | 10 | 1 | 2.2 | 1.48 | 1039 | 1036 m | 85%, 18b δ(C–H) in benzene ring |
| 1098.5 | 5 | 0 | 3.9 | 2.80 | 1081 | 1071 w | 60%, ν(C30–N, C33–N) + 25% δ(C–H) in CH2 |
| 1157.6 | 32 | 2 | 1.6 | 1.29 | 1139 | 1137 m | 85%, 15 δ(C–H) in benzene ring |
| 1183.0 | 44 | 3 | 1.1 | 0.93 | 1164 | 1157 m | 90%, 9a δ(C–H) in benzene ring |
| 1229.6 | 49 | 4 | 2.3 | 2.01 | 1210 | 1202 s | 80%, 9b δ(C–C, C–H) in benzene ring |
| 1230.6 | 20 | 2 | 2.4 | 2.17 | 1211 | 1212 m | 80%, 9b δ(C–C, C–H) in benzene ring |
| 1364.4 | 22 | 2 | 2.0 | 2.23 | 1342 | 1310 s | 60% δs(C–H) in C30H2, C33H2 + 15% δs(C–H) in C36H2 |
| 1371.6 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 | 4.44 | 1349 | 1346 sh | 50%, ν(C–O) + 40%,19b ν(C=C) in benzene ring |
| 1380.3 | 58 | 4 | 1.5 | 1.66 | 1358 | 1340 m | 65% δs(C–H) in C36H2 + 30% δs(C–H) in C30H2, C33H2 |
| 1436.5 | 109 | 8 | 1.6 | 1.89 | 1413 | 1400 m | 70%, δ(C–H) in C9H, C15H |
| 1438.8 | 1 | 0 | 1.6 | 1.94 | 1415 | 1423 m | 70%, δ(C–H) in C9H, C15H |
| 1489.2 | 120 | 9 | 2.9 | 3.84 | 1439 | 1449 s | 50%,19b ν(C=C)+ 40%δ(CH) in benzene ring, C30H2,C33H2 |
| 1505.8 | 77 | 6 | 2.2 | 2.99 | 1455 | 60%, δas(C–H) in C36H2 | |
| 1512.5 | 119 | 9 | 1.3 | 1.80 | 1461 | 1475 vs | 85%, δas(C–H) in CH2 |
| 1576.2 | 166 | 13 | 4.9 | 7.21 | 1521 | 1548 vs | 80%, 8b ν(C=C) in benzene ring |
| 1666.4 | 102 | 8 | 5.7 | 9.28 | 1606 | 1575 vs | 70%, 8a ν(C=C) in benzene ring |
| 1668.6 | 10 | 1 | 5.7 | 9.42 | 1608 | 1605 m | 70%, 8a ν(C=C) in benzene ring |
| 1683.8 | 1308 | 100 | 6.5 | 10.8 | 1622 | 1628 vs | 78%, ν(C9=N, C15=N) |
| 1701.2 | 190 | 15 | 6.8 | 11.6 | 1639 | 1647 vs | 80%, ν(C9=N, C15=N) |
| 1738 m | ν(CO) | ||||||
| 2364, 2356vs | intermolecular H-bonds? or ν(CO2) of air? | ||||||
| 3017.1 | 32 | 2 | 1.1 | 5.71 | 2880 | 2862 vw | 100%, ν(C–H) |
| 3017.5 | 55 | 4 | 1.1 | 5.71 | 2880 | 2875 vw | 100%, ν(C–H) |
| 3040.9 | 46 | 4 | 1.1 | 5.92 | 2902 | 2910 w | 100%, ν(C–H) |
| 3048.1 | 75 | 6 | 1.1 | 5.81 | 2909 | 2918 w | 100%, ν(C–H) |
| 3069.8 | 6 | 0 | 1.1 | 6.11 | 2929 | 2931 sh | 100%, ν(C–H) |
| 3079.3 | 12 | 1 | 1.1 | 6.15 | 2938 | 2940 s | 90%, νas(C–H) in C30H2, C33H2 |
| 3099.4 | 56 | 4 | 1.1 | 6.25 | 2957 | 2970 m | 70%, νas(CH) in C36H2 + 30%,νas(CH) in C30H2, C33H2 |
| 3178.2 | 17 | 1 | 1.1 | 6.48 | 3031 | 3037 m | 95%, 20b ν(C–H) in benzene ring |
| 3207.3 | 37 | 3 | 1.1 | 6.62 | 3059 | 3051 m | 95%, 20b ν(C–H) in benzene ring |
| 3213.0 | 22 | 2 | 1.1 | 6.67 | 3064 | 3099 vw | 100%, ν(C–H) |
aNormalized to the highest value. b With the scaling equation: νscal = 3.3 + 0.9813·νcal. (for the 400–1450 cm−1 range), and νscal = 34.7 + 0.9429·νcal. (for the 1450–3300 cm−1 range).
Figure 8Images of cast films of HSA+ZnL (left) and HSA (right). Squares are mentioned in the text of Section 2.3.1.
Figure 9FT-IR spectra of cast films of HSA (left) and HSA+ZnL (right).
Figure 10Change of raw IR spectra (amide I and II bands) after IR-FEL irradiation (1622 cm−1) for 0–30 min for (a) HSA+ZnL and (b) HSA. Results of protein secondary structure analysis after IR-FEL irradiation (1622 cm−1) for 0–30 min for (c) HSA+ZnL and (d) HSA with linear regression functions.
Figure 11Change of raw IR spectra (amide I and II bands) after IR-FEL irradiation (1652 cm−1) for 0–30 min for min for (a) HSA+ZnL and (b) HSA.
Figure 12Change of raw IR spectra (amide I and II bands) after IR-FEL irradiation (1652, 1537 cm−1) for 0–30 min for (a) HSA+ZnL and (b) HSA. Results of protein secondary structure analysis after IR-FEL irradiation (1652, 1537 cm−1) for 0–30 min for (c) HSA+ZnL and (d) HSA with linear regression functions.