| Literature DB >> 32013210 |
Axelle Aimond1,2, Kevin Calabro3, Coralie Audoin2, Elodie Olivier1, Mélody Dutot1, Pauline Buron1, Patrice Rat1, Olivier Laprévote1, Soizic Prado4, Emmanuel Roulland4, Olivier P Thomas3, Grégory Genta-Jouve1,5.
Abstract
This paper reports the isolation and structural characterization of four new ent-kaurane derivatives from the Lamiaceae plant Sideritis hyssopifolia. Planar structures and relative configurations were determined using both mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance (1D and 2D). Absolute configurations were determined by comparing experimental and theoretical electronic circular dichroism spectra. The cytotoxic and microbial activities of all new compounds were tested. Compounds that were non-cytotoxic were further evaluated for anti-inflammatory activity.Entities:
Keywords: NMR; Sideritis hyssopifolia; anti-inflammatory; ent-kaurane
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32013210 PMCID: PMC7037520 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25030589
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Structure of the new ent-kauranes compounds 1–4.
H NMR data of compounds 1–4 (H 500 MHz).
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | ||||
| 1a | 1.84 (dt, 13.0, 3.5) | 1.82 (dt, 13.2, 3.5) | 1.84 (m) | 1.84 (m) |
| 1b | 0.95 (m) | 1.03 (m) | 1.05 (td, 13.0, 4.0) | 1.07 (dd, 12.5, 3.6) |
| 2a | 1.67 (m) | 1.70 (m) | 1.69 (m) | 1.65 (m) |
| 2b | 1.60 (m) | 1.62 (m) | 1.64 (m) | 1.52 (m) |
| 3a | 3.17 (dd, 11.6, 4.5) | 4.52 (dd, 11.6, 5.1) | 4.53 (dd, 11.6, 5.0) | 1.55 (m) |
| 3b | - | - | - | 1.27 (dd, 14.3, 5.5) |
| 4 | - | - | - | - |
| 5 | 1.40 (d, 12.0) | 1.49 (m) | 1.55 (m) | 1.86 (m) |
| 6a | 1.66 (m) | 1.65 (m) | 1.68 (m) | 1.74 (dd, 14.4, 3.8) |
| 6b | 1.62 (m) | 1.56 (m) | ||
| 7 | 3.54 (bs) | 3.63 (t, 2.9) | 3.62 (t, 3.1) | 4.82 (t, 3.0) |
| 8 | - | - | - | - |
| 9 | 1.28 (d, 4.7) | 1.30 (d, 7.5) | 1.42 (d, 6.6) | 1.86 (m) |
| 10 | - | - | - | - |
| 11 | 1.54 (m) | 1.49 (m) | 1.56 (m) | 5.36 (dd, 9.7, 3.5) |
| 12a | 1.51 (m) | 1.49 (m) | 1.70 (m) | 6.25 (dd, 9.6, 6.5) |
| 12b | 1.49 (m) | - | ||
| 13 | 2.33 (bs) | 2.37 (bs) | 2.68 (m) | 2.56 (m) |
| 14a | 1.96 (d, 9.9) | 1.89 d (10.1) | 1.82 (m) | 2.01 (d, 9.4) |
| 14b | 1.35 (dd, 10.1, 5.3) | 1.36 (d, 10.2, 5.2) | 1.17 (dd, 11.4, 5.0) | 1.50 (m) |
| 15 | 5.52 (s) | 5.47 (s) | 2.25 (bs) | 5.09 (s) |
| 16 | - | - | - | - |
| 17a | 1.71 (s) | 1.72 (bs) | 4.83 (bs) | 1.77 (d, 1.1) |
| 17b | - | - | 4.80 (bs) | - |
| 18 | 0.96 (s) | 0.84 (s) | 0.88 (s) | 0.72 (s) |
| 19a | 0.76 (s) | 0.85 (s) | 0.86 (s) | 3.36 (d, 10.8) |
| 19b | - | - | - | 3.04 (d, 10.8) |
| 20 | 1.07 (s) | 1.05 (s) | 1.05 (s) | 1.04 (s) |
| 21 | - | - | - | - |
| 22 | - | 2.04 (s) | 2.04 (s) | 2.09 (s) |
CDOD, CDCl.
C NMR data of compounds 1–4 (C 125 MHz).
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. |
|
|
|
|
| 1 | 40.1 | 38.4 | 38.4 | 39.2 |
| 2 | 28.1 | 23.6 | 23.8 | 17.9 |
| 3 | 79.8 | 80.8 | 81.0 | 35.1 |
| 4 | 39.4 | 37.2 | 37.4 | 37.1 |
| 5 | 46.1 | 45.1 | 45.6 | 38.8 |
| 6 | 27.7 | 26.7 | 27.4 | 23.9 |
| 7 | 76.2 | 75.0 | 77.2 | 78.0 |
| 8 | 54.5 | 53.3 | 48.3 | 50.5 |
| 9 | 45.2 | 43.7 | 50.3 | 50.9 |
| 10 | 40.3 | 39.1 | 38.9 | 38.8 |
| 11 | 19.6 | 18.4 | 18.0 | 126.1 |
| 12 | 25.9 | 24.8 | 33.7 | 134.4 |
| 13 | 46.1 | 44.7 | 43.9 | 45.5 |
| 14 | 43.5 | 42.1 | 38.6 | 40.2 |
| 15 | 131.9 | 129.7 | 45.8 | 126.6 |
| 16 | 144.2 | 144.3 | 154.9 | 154.0 |
| 17 | 15.5 | 15.5 | 103.8 | 15.9 |
| 18 | 162 | 16.6 | 16.9 | 17.6 |
| 19 | 28.6 | 28.0 | 28.3 | 71.3 |
| 20 | 18.2 | 17.6 | 17.6 | 17.5 |
| 21 | - | 170.9 | 171.1 | 170.5 |
| 22 | - | 21.3 | 21.5 | 21.5 |
CDOD, CDCl.
Figure 2(A) COSY correlations; (B) HMBC key correlations; and (C) NOESY correlations.
Figure 3Comparison between experimental and theoretical ECD spectra of compound 1.
Figure 4Viability of HaCaT cells after 6 h of incubation with compounds 1, 3 and 4. (NS: not significant; ****: p < 0.0001).
Figure 5Anti-inflammatory activity of compounds 1 and 4 in HaCaT cells stimulated by poly(I:C). Compounds in ethanol were prepared at 1:100 dilution in cell medium to obtain a concentration of 10 g/mL (***: p < 0.001 compared to cell medium with poly(I:C); ####: p < 0.0001).