| Literature DB >> 32013130 |
Chuan Du1,2, Handong Liang1,2, Zhanping Li3, Jie Gong1,2.
Abstract
Microplastics (MPs) are emerging pollutants that exist in different environmental media. Because of their wide range and large potential environmental hazards, they have attracted widespread attention in recent years. At present, the research on MP is mostly concentrated on the water ecosystems, and the impact on soil ecosystems is less studied. In this study, 12 typical soil samples from southeastern suburbs of Baoding city were investigated and characterized by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (TOF-SIMS) combined with mass high resolution mode and positive and negative ion imaging mode. Four types of MPs, poly (propylene) (PP), poly (vinyl chloride) (PVC), poly (ethylene terephthalate) (PET), and poly (amide 6) (PA6), were quickly identified, of which PET and PA6 accounted for the largest proportion of both up to 30.2%; the particle size of the obtained MPs ranged from 0 to 35 μm, of which the proportion of <10 μm MPs was more than 26.3%, while that of 20-25 μm and 25-35 μm MPs was relatively small (17.83% and 9.3%, respectively). Risk assessment results of the MP in the soil showed that the risk level of MPs in the non-ferrous metal industrial parks and in concentrated with small workshops areas is relatively high, and attention should be paid to such areas. In addition, the study provides a reference method for the investigation and risk assessment of MPs in terrestrial soils, coastal beaches, and sediments.Entities:
Keywords: TOF-SIMS; microplastics; pollution characteristics; risk assessment; soil
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32013130 PMCID: PMC7037837 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17030845
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Location of sampling points and soil utilization type.
| Site Number | Latitude and Longitude | Elevation | Soil Utilization Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| XA1 | 115.829121° E, 38.793376° N | 11 m | Industrial Park |
| XA2 | 115.667520° E, 38.737593° N | 4 m | Factory |
| XA3 | 115.967873° E, 38.737334° N | 14 m | Forest Land |
| XA4 | 116.129161° E, 38.922821° N | 14 m | Residential Area |
| XA5 | 115.967832° E, 38.774490° N | 11 m | Factory |
| XA6 | 115.667495° E, 38.792877° N | 22 m | Farmland |
| XA7 | 115.921591° E, 38.700302° N | 9 m | Factory |
| XA8 | 115.852379° E, 38.792931° N | 7 m | Residential Area |
| XA9 | 115.713766° E, 38.848288° N | 7 m | Farmland |
| XA10 | 116.105875° E, 38.903642° N | 4 m | Farmland |
| XA11 | 115.760000° E, 38.922257° N | 11 m | Factory |
| XA12 | 115.898340° E, 38.957338° N | 5 m | Farmland |
Typical fragment ions of four microplastic MP standard samples.
| Polymer Type | Characteristic Peak Mass ( | Typical Fragment Ion Composition |
|---|---|---|
| PP | 57.074, 71.091, 81.103, 83.134, 95.137 | C4H9+, C5H11+, C6H9+, C6H11+, C7H11+ |
| PA6 | 30.036, 44.051, 56.068 | CH4N+, C2H6N+, C3H6N+ |
| PET | 104.014, 142.075, 149.006 | C7H4O+, C7H10O3+, C8H5O3+ |
| PVC | 83.978, 125.050, 151.79 | C4HCl+, C7H6Cl+, C9H8Cl+ |
Polymer information for MPs detected in this study.
| Polymer Type | Monomer | Density (g/cm3) | Main Application | Fraction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP | Propylene | 0.85–0.94 | Agricultural film, bottle, food packaging etc. | 1 |
| PA6 | Caprolactam | 1.13 | Bearings, automotive applications, etc. | 50 |
| PET | Terephthalic acid and ethylene glycol | 1.33–1.38 | Food and drug packaging film, packaging bottle, automobile application, etc. | - |
| PVC | Vinyl chloride | 1.41 | Pipe, cable insulation, etc. | 10,551 |
PET lacks ecological toxicity data, therefore its hazard score cannot be determined. The value for the score of each polymer is taken from Lithner [24].
Risk rating criteria for MP contamination.
| Value of Polymer Index | <1000 | 1000–1500 | 1500–2000 | 2000–2500 | >2500 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk category (PI) | Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | Ⅳ | Ⅴ |
Figure 1Positive ion spectra obtained XA1.
Figure 2Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) maps of some characteristic ions of MPs in XA1 (a–e) PP; (f–h) PA6; (i–k) PET; (l–n) PVC.
Figure 3Ion-imaging superimposed images of four MPs (a) XA1; (b) XA2; (c) XA3; (d) XA4; (e) XA5; (f) XA6; (g) XA7; (h) XA8; (i) XA9; (j) XA10; (k) XA11; (l) XA12; 500 μm × 500 μm, 128 × 128 pixel.
Figure 4Particle size, type and abundance of MPs in soil. (a) Particle size composition and relative content of MPs in soil; (b) Composition and relative content of MPs types in soils; (c) Particle size composition of different types of MPs in the soil.
Figure 5Risk degree of MPs in the study area. Different colors represent different polymer risk indexes.