| Literature DB >> 32013086 |
Alicja Michalik1, Bogna D Napruszewska1, Anna Walczyk1, Joanna Kryściak-Czerwenka1, Dorota Duraczyńska1, Ewa M Serwicka1.
Abstract
The study describes the synthesis of Mg-Al hydrotalcite (Ht) with the use of starch as a structure controlling biotemplate. Syntheses were carried out at room temperature, by co-precipitation at pH = 10. The investigated synthesis parameters included the nature of the precipitating agent (NaOH/Na2CO3 or NH3aq/(NH4)2CO3), the nature of starch (potato, corn and cassava), the method of starch addition to reagents, the method of drying and the effect of washing. The materials were examined with X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and infrared spectroscopy. The data show that synthesis of Ht materials in the presence of starch, with use of the ammonia-based precipitant, enabled preparation of nanocrystalline Ht with very fine (<50 nm) particle size. All investigated starches had a similar effect on the crystallinity and the grain size of Ht precipitates. Ht with the smallest nanocrystals was obtained when starch was present in all solutions used for synthesis, and the final product subjected to freeze drying. Washing with water was found to enhance recrystallization and exchange of nitrates for carbonates. Infrared spectra showed that an interaction exists between the biopolymer template and the Ht particles, resulting in a higher degree of order within the Ht-adhering starch component.Entities:
Keywords: biotemplate; crystallinity; hydrotalcite; layered double hydroxide; nanoparticles; starch
Year: 2020 PMID: 32013086 PMCID: PMC7040624 DOI: 10.3390/ma13030602
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
The effect of the precipitating agent and of the nature of starch on XRD determined d003 and d110 interplanar spacings, and D003 and D110 crystal sizes; EDS determined Mg/Al ratio.
| Sample | Interplanar Spacing (nm) | Crystal Size (nm) | Mg/Al | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| d003 | d110 | D003 | D110 | ||
| HtNaOH | 0.780 | 0.1532 | 8.5 | 16.4 | 2.86 |
| HtNaOH0.2POS | 0.785 | 0.1533 | 7.0 | 12.6 | 2.92 |
| HtNH3 | 0.770 | 0.1526 | 7.2 | 14.7 | 2.59 |
| HtNH30.2POS | 0.842 | n.d. | 3.3 | n.d. | 2.80 |
| HtNH30.2COS | 0.836 | n.d. | 4.1 | n.d. | 2.77 |
| HtNH30.2CAS | 0.847 | n.d | 3.6 | n.d | 2.68 |
Figure 1X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of Ht materials obtained with the use of different precipitating agents and in the presence or absence of various starches.
Figure 2SEM images of Ht materials obtained with the use of different precipitating agents and in the presence or absence of various starches: (a) HtNaOH; (b) HtNH3; (c) HtNaOH0.2POS; (d) HtNH30.2POS; (e) HtNH30.2COS and (f) HtNH30.2CAS. Magnification × 100,000.
Figure 3Impact of the method of starch addition (to all reagents, only to (NH4)2CO3, or to NH3aq + salt solutions) and of the method of drying (drying box—DB or freeze-drier—FD) on XRD patterns of HTNH30.2POS.
The effect of the method of starch addition and of the method of drying on XRD determined d003 interplanar spacings, and D003 crystal sizes.
| Sample | d003 Interplanar Spacing (nm) | D003 Crystal Size (nm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drying Box | Freeze-drier | Drying Box | Freeze-drier | |
| HtNH30.2POS | 0.842 | 0.897 | 3.3 | 2.8 |
| HtNH30.2POS | 0.862 | 0.877 | 5.0 | 3.5 |
| HtNH30.2POS | 0.834 | 0.872 | 4.1 | 3.8 |
Figure 4Structural changes in the HtNH30.2POS sample upon washing with water at different temperatures. All materials freeze dried.
The effect of washing with water on XRD determined d003 and d110 interplanar spacings, and D003 and D110 crystal sizes of freeze-fried HtNH30.2POS sample.
| Sample | Interplanar Spacing (nm) | Crystal Size (nm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| d003 | d110 | D003 | D110 | |
| HtNH30.2POS | 0.897 | n.d. | 2.8 | n.d. |
| HtNH30.2POS | 0.770 | 0.1530 | 4.2 | 8.4 |
| HtNH30.2POS | 0.769 | 0.1531 | 4.3 | 8.6 |
| HtNH30.2POS | 0.770 | 0.1530 | 4.8 | 8.8 |
| HtNH30.2POSwashed at 80 °C | 0.773 | 0.1531 | 5.6 | 10.2 |
Figure 5FTIR spectra of: (a) sample HtNH30.2POS, HtNH3, and dried 0.2 wt.% potato starch gel, with the marked area indicative of starch order-disorder and the (b) blown-up fragment of the spectra in the marked area.