Literature DB >> 32012451

Changes in offer and acceptance patterns for pediatric kidney transplant candidates under the new Kidney Allocation System.

Kyle R Jackson1, Mary G Bowring1, Amber Kernodle1, Brian Boyarsky1, Niraj Desai1, Olga Charnaya2, Jacqueline Garonzik-Wang1, Allan B Massie1, Dorry L Segev1,3,4.   

Abstract

Stakeholders have expressed concerns regarding decreased deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT) rates for pediatric candidates under the Kidney Allocation System (KAS). To better understand what might be driving this, we studied Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients kidney offer data for 3642 pediatric (age <18 years) kidney-only transplant candidates between December 31, 2012 to December 3, 2014 (pre-KAS) and December 4, 2014 to January 6, 2017 (post-KAS). We used negative binomial regression and multilevel logistic regression to compare offer and acceptance rates pre- and post-KAS. We stratified by donor age (<18, 18-34, and 35+ years) and KDPI (<35% and ≥35%) to reflect differing allocation prioritization pre-KAS and post-KAS. As might be expected from prioritization changes, post-KAS candidates were less likely to receive offers for donors 18-34 years old with KDPI ≥ 35% (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR]: 0.18 0.210.25 , P < .001), and more likely to receive offers for donors 18-34 years old and KDPI < 35% (aIRR: 1.12 1.201.29 , P < .001). However, offer acceptance practices also changed post-KAS: kidneys from donors 18-34 years old and KDPI < 35% were 23% less likely to be accepted post-KAS (adjusted odds ratio: 0.61 0.770.98 , P = .03). Using kidneys from donors 18-34 years old with KDPI < 35% post-KAS to the same extent they were used pre-KAS might be an effective strategy to mitigate any decrease in DDKT rates for pediatric candidates.
© 2020 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical research/practice; health services and outcomes research; kidney transplantation/nephrology; organ allocation; organ procurement and allocation; pediatrics; registry/registry analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32012451     DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  4 in total

1.  Racial Disparities in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation under the New Kidney Allocation System in the United States.

Authors:  Jill Krissberg; Matthew Kaufmann; Anshal Gupta; Eran Bendavid; Margaret Stedman; Xingxing Cheng; Jane Tan; Paul Grimm; Abanti Chaudhuri
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  The unfinished journey toward transplant equity: an analysis of racial/ethnic disparities for children after the implementation of the Kidney Allocation System in 2014.

Authors:  Olga Charnaya; Laura Zeiser; Dolev Yisar; Aviva Goldberg; Dorry L Segev; Allan Massie; Jacqueline Garonzik-Wang; Priya Verghese
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.651

3.  Access to kidney transplantation among pediatric candidates with prior solid organ transplants in the United States.

Authors:  Syed Ali Husain; Kristen L King; Nina L Owen-Simon; Hilda E Fernandez; Lloyd E Ratner; Sumit Mohan
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2022-05-26

4.  Transplantation Mediates Much of the Racial Disparity in Survival from Childhood-Onset Kidney Failure.

Authors:  Adan Z Becerra; Kevin E Chan; Paul W Eggers; Jenna Norton; Paul L Kimmel; Ivonne H Schulman; Susan R Mendley
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 14.978

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.