Literature DB >> 32011197

Prevalence of permanent neonatal hearing impairment: systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis.

Andrea M L Bussé1, Hans L J Hoeve1, Kazem Nasserinejad2, Allison R Mackey3, Huibert J Simonsz1, André Goedegebure1.   

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the variance in reported prevalence rates of permanent neonatal hearing impairment (HI) worldwide.Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed on reported prevalence rates of sensorineural and permanent conductive or mixed HI worse than 40 dB in neonates, detected as a result of a screening programme or audiometric study.Study sample: For meta-analysis, 35 articles were selected, 25 from high-income countries and 10 from middle-income countries according to the world bank classification system.
Results: The prevalence rate of permanent uni- and bilateral HI worse than 40 dB in neonates varied from 1 to 6 per 1000, the overall prevalence was 2.21 per 1000 [1.71, 2.8]. In NICU populations the prevalence rate was higher with a larger fraction of bilateral cases. Although not significant, prevalence rates were slightly higher in Asia compared to Europe and the number of infants lost to follow-up appeared higher in countries with lower gross national income.
Conclusion: Substantial variations exist in prevalence rates of neonatal permanent HI across countries and regions. There is a strong need for more data from low-income countries to identify demographic factors that account for this variability in reported prevalence rates. Reporting these data in a uniform way is advocated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prevalence; meta-analysis; neonatal hearing impairment; neonatal hearing screening; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32011197     DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1716087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  7 in total

Review 1.  Newborn Hearing Screening Benefits Children, but Global Disparities Persist.

Authors:  Katrin Neumann; Philipp Mathmann; Shelly Chadha; Harald A Euler; Karl R White
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 4.241

2.  Assessment of Hearing Screening Combined With Limited and Expanded Genetic Screening for Newborns in Nantong, China.

Authors:  Qing-Wen Zhu; Mu-Ting Li; Xun Zhuang; Kai Chen; Wan-Qing Xu; Yin-Hua Jiang; Gang Qin
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-09-01

3.  Diversity of Child and Family Characteristics of Children with Hearing Loss in Family-Centered Early Intervention in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Rosanne B van der Zee; Evelien Dirks
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Predictors of Early Language Outcomes in Children with Connexin 26 Hearing Loss across Three Countries.

Authors:  Daniel Holzinger; Magdalena Dall; Sandra Kiblböck; Evelien Dirks; Peter Carew; Libby Smith; Lilian Downie; Daisy A Shepherd; Valerie Sung
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-01

5.  Protocol and programme factors associated with referral and loss to follow-up from newborn hearing screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Allison R Mackey; Andrea M L Bussé; Valeria Del Vecchio; Elina Mäki-Torkko; Inger M Uhlén
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 2.567

6.  Views of Syrian Mothers in Ankara on Infant Hearing Loss: Cross-sectional Survey.

Authors:  Diala Hussein; Hilal Dinçer D'Alessandro; Merve Özbal Batuk; Amar Ekhwan; Gonca Sennaroğlu
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2022-09-05

Review 7.  Multidimensional Family-Centred Early Intervention in Children with Hearing Loss: A Conceptual Model.

Authors:  Daniel Holzinger; Johannes Hofer; Magdalena Dall; Johannes Fellinger
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.