Chih-Wen Twu1, Wen-Yi Wang2, Hsiao-Hui Tsou3,4, Yi-Chun Liu5,6, Rong-San Jiang7, Kai-Li Liang7, Po-Ju Lin8, Tian-Yun Lin9, Hsin-Hong Chen10, Jin-Ching Lin5,6,8,10. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan. 2. Department of Nursing, Hung Kuang University, Taichung, Taiwan. 3. Institute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan. 4. Graduate Institute of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan. 5. Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan. 7. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan. 8. Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan. 9. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. 10. Research Department, Division of Translation Research, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We investigated treatment results, the effects of different treatment modality, and pretreatment Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) viral load for stage III nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. METHODS: The initial definitive treatment for 356 stage III NPC patients consisted of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) or induction chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (IndCT-RT). The pretreatment EBV DNA level separated patients into a high (n = 106) or low (n = 250) viral load (≥ or < 1000 copies/mL) subgroup. Outcome measures include relapse rates and various survivals. RESULTS: The 5-year rates of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis failure-free survival (DMFFS), and locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS) were 88.6%, 83.0%, 90.5%, and 90.5%, respectively. Patient characteristics and pretreatment viral load between IndCT-RT and CCRT were no significant differences except for a higher percentage of N2 disease in the IndCT-RT subgroup. Both treatment modality resulted in similar relapse rates (P = .56), OS (P = .20), PFS (P = .53), DMFFS (P = .89), and LRFFS (P = .35). However, patients with a high viral load experienced a higher relapse rate (33.0% vs 12.4%, P < .001) and worse OS (5-year rate, 79.0% vs 92.8%, P < .001), PFS (73.7% vs 88.4%, P < .001), DMFFS (80.2% vs 95.0%, P < .001), and LRFFS (85.6% vs 92.6%, P = .005) than those with a low viral load. CONCLUSION: Long-term treatment results for stage III NPC patients are rather good. IndCT-RT can achieve the same treatment outcome as CCRT. Risk grouping by pretreatment viral load identified a subgroup (30%) of patients associated with a significantly higher relapse rates and worse survivals. These high-risk patients need to strengthen treatment intensity in future trials.
BACKGROUND: We investigated treatment results, the effects of different treatment modality, and pretreatment Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) viral load for stage III nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. METHODS: The initial definitive treatment for 356 stage III NPC patients consisted of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) or induction chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (IndCT-RT). The pretreatment EBV DNA level separated patients into a high (n = 106) or low (n = 250) viral load (≥ or < 1000 copies/mL) subgroup. Outcome measures include relapse rates and various survivals. RESULTS: The 5-year rates of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis failure-free survival (DMFFS), and locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS) were 88.6%, 83.0%, 90.5%, and 90.5%, respectively. Patient characteristics and pretreatment viral load between IndCT-RT and CCRT were no significant differences except for a higher percentage of N2 disease in the IndCT-RT subgroup. Both treatment modality resulted in similar relapse rates (P = .56), OS (P = .20), PFS (P = .53), DMFFS (P = .89), and LRFFS (P = .35). However, patients with a high viral load experienced a higher relapse rate (33.0% vs 12.4%, P < .001) and worse OS (5-year rate, 79.0% vs 92.8%, P < .001), PFS (73.7% vs 88.4%, P < .001), DMFFS (80.2% vs 95.0%, P < .001), and LRFFS (85.6% vs 92.6%, P = .005) than those with a low viral load. CONCLUSION: Long-term treatment results for stage III NPC patients are rather good. IndCT-RT can achieve the same treatment outcome as CCRT. Risk grouping by pretreatment viral load identified a subgroup (30%) of patients associated with a significantly higher relapse rates and worse survivals. These high-risk patients need to strengthen treatment intensity in future trials.