| Literature DB >> 32010799 |
Jun-Ming Xu1, Xin-Chang Wang2, Ji-Peng Cheng3.
Abstract
Currently, ternaryEntities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32010799 PMCID: PMC6990422 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b03865
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1Crystal structure of the spinel phase of CuCo2S4.
Figure 2(a) Illustration of ionic transport process in the CuCo2S4 electrode. Reprinted with permission from ref (12). Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society. (b) The fabrication process of CuCo2S4 hollow nanoneedles on Ni foam. Reproduced with permission from ref (18). Copyright 2016, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Summary of Electrochemical Performances of CuCo2S4 Materials and the Nanostructures on Conductive Substrates
| shape and structure | electrolyte | specific capacitance | cycling stability | ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3D nanorods | 2 M KOH | 515 F g–1 at 1 A g–1 | 93.3% after 10000 cycles | ( |
| hollow spheres | 6 M KOH | 1137.5 F g–1 at 2 A g–1 | 94.9% after 6000 cycles | ( |
| mesoporous particles | 2 M KOH | 752 F g–1 at 2 A g–1 | 98.1% after 5000 cycles | ( |
| nanoparticles | polysulfide | 5030 F g–1 at 20 A g–1 | 79.5% after 2000 cycles | ( |
| nanoparticles | 2 M KOH | 652 F g–1 at 20 A g–1 | 95.6% after 5000 cycles | ( |
| nanoparticles | 2 M KOH | 580 F g–1 at 1 A g–1 | 99.5% after 6000 cycles | ( |
| microspheres | 3 M KOH | 1566 F g–1 at 2 A g–1 | 95.7% after 5000 cycles | ( |
| nanorod arrays on carbon cloth | 3 M KOH | 1536.9 F g–1 at 1 A g–1 | 94.9% after 10000 cycles | ( |
| microspheres on carbon cloth | 6 M KOH | 1200 F g–1 at 1 A g–1 | 91.2% after 3000 cycles | ( |
| nanosheets on Ni foam | 3 M KOH | 3132.7 F g–1 at 1 A g–1 | – | ( |
| nanosheets on Ni foam | 2 M KOH | 908.9 F g–1 at 4.5 A g–1 | 91.1% after 2000 cycles | ( |
| nanowires on Ni foam | 6 M KOH | 2446.6 F g–1 at 1 A g–1 | 82% after 10000 cycles | ( |
| nanorods on Ni foam | 3 M KOH | 2163 F g–1 at 2 A g–1 | 96.3% after 6000 cycles | ( |
| nanorods on Ni foam | 2 M KOH | 1852 F g–1 at 2 A g–1 | 96% after 4000 cycles | ( |
Figure 3(a) TEM image of single CNTs@CuCo2S4 and (b) corresponding EDS mapping images, which demonstrate that C (red), N (green), Cu (orange), Co (blue), and S (yellow) are homogeneously distributed. Reprinted with permission from ref (21). Copyright 2018, Elsevier. (c) SEM image of CuCo2S4/graphene and the inset showing the SEM image of CuCo2S4. (d) TEM image of CuCo2S4/graphene, and the inset is the size distribution of CuCo2S4. Reprinted with permission from ref (23). Copyright 2019, Elsevier.
Electrochemical Performances of the Composites of CuCo2S4 and Carbon Materials
| composites | electrolyte | specific capacitance | cycling stability | ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CuCo2S4@graphite on Ni foam | 6 M KOH | 1244 F g–1 at 50 A g–1 | 85.3% after 2000 cycles | ( |
| CNTs@NC@CuCo2S4 | 6 M KOH | 1064 F g–1 at 1 A g–1 | 93.6% after 2000 cycles | ( |
| CNTs@CuCo2S4 | 1 M KOH | 1690.3 F g–1 at 1 A g–1 | 95.5% after 10000 cycles | ( |
| CuCo2S4 on graphene | 3 M KOH | 688 F g–1 at 1 A g–1 | 84.5% after 8000 cycles | ( |
| CuCo2S4@N-doped graphene | 6 M KOH | 1005 F g–1 at 1 A g–1 | 96.3% after 5000 cycles | ( |
| graphene quantum dots@CuCo2S4 | 3 M KOH | 1725 F g–1 at 0.5 A g–1 | 90% after 10000 cycles | ( |
Figure 4(a) SEM image of CuCo2S4@NiMn(OH)2 on Ni foam and (b) TEM image of CuCo2S4@NiMn(OH)2. Reprinted with permission from ref (26c). Copyright 2018, Elsevier. (c) Schematic diagram and (d) a typical photo of CuCo2S4/PAN film. Reprinted with permission from ref (27). Copyright 2018, Elsevier.
Figure 5(a) SEM image of CuCo2S4 nanorod arrays on carbon textiles and (b) two AEC devices connected in series could light up 15 LEDs.[13] (c) Schematic illustration of an ASC device and (d) specific capacitance and corresponding capacitance retention of the ASC device at different current densities. Reprinted with permission from ref (26d). Copyright 2018, Elsevier.
Summarized Electrochemical Properties of CuCo2S4-Based AECs
| positive electrode | negative electrode | electrolyte | voltage | energy density | energy density | ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CuCo2S4 | AC | 2 M KOH | 1.6 V | 50.56 Wh kg–1 | 4600 W kg–1 | ( |
| CuCo2S4 on carbon textile | AC | PVA/KOH | 1.6 V | 56.96 Wh kg–1 | 320 W kg–1 | ( |
| CuCo2S4 on carbon textile | AC | PVA/KOH | 1.6 V | 17.12 Wh kg–1 | 194.4 W kg–1 | ( |
| CuCo2S4 on Ni foam | AC | 3 M KOH | 1.6 V | 46.1 Wh kg–1 | 991.6 W kg–1 | ( |
| CuCo2S4 on Ni foam | Fe2O3/graphene | PVA/KOH | 1.6 V | 89.6 Wh kg–1 | 663 W kg–1 | ( |
| CuCo2S4 on Ni foam | AC | 6 M KOH | 1.5 V | 33.4 Wh kg–1 | 751.5 W kg–1 | ( |
| CuCo2S4/graphite | reduced graphene | 6 M KOH | 1.6 V | 58.4 Wh kg–1 | 797 W kg–1 | ( |
| CuCo2S4/CNTs | CNTs | 1 M KOH | 1.6 V | 37.32 Wh kg–1 | 800.7 W kg–1 | ( |
| CuCo2S4/graphene | graphene | 6 M KOH | 1.6 V | 53.3 Wh kg–1 | 795 W kg–1 | ( |
| CuCo2S4@NiMn(OH)2 | AC | 6 M KOH | 1.5 V | 45.8 Wh kg–1 | 1499 W kg–1 | ( |
| CuCo2S4/CuCo2O4 | graphene | 2 M KOH | 1.6 V | 33.2 Wh kg–1 | 800 W kg–1 | ( |