| Literature DB >> 32010797 |
Bishnupad Mohanty1, Bikash Kumar Jena1,2, Suddhasatwa Basu1,2,3.
Abstract
The electrochemical energy conversions play an essential role in the production of sustainable and renewable energy. However, the performance is not up to the mark due to the absence of highly efficient and stable electrocatalysts. Recently, both 2D-matrix and single-atom catalysts (SACs) are two intense research topics in the field of electrocatalysis due to the high activity and stability and to maximize the utilization efficiency. Engineering the materials from 3D to 2D and modification from nanoparticles to single atoms have created a significant enhancement in the electrocatalytic activity. Hybridizing both the 2D matrix and SACs (2DM@SACs) creates a new electronic state in the materials, and that bequeaths with enhancing potentials toward the electrocatalytic activity. The strong covalent interaction between the 2D matrix and SACs tunes the intrinsic activity of the electrocatalysts. In this mini-review, we have discussed the different synthesis methods of 2DM@SACs with a focus on their electrochemical energy applications such as hydrogen evolution, oxygen evolution, oxygen reduction, and carbon dioxide reduction. This mini-review appraises the contribution to the rational proposal for the synthesis of perfect 2DM@SAC catalysts with their electrochemical properties toward energy conversion applications.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32010797 PMCID: PMC6990445 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b03515
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1Illustration of synthesis and energy applications of 2D materials confining SACs.
Summary of the Synthesis Method and Applications of 2D-Matrix-Supported SACs
| single-atom catalysts (SACs) | 2D support | synthesis methods | application | ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pt | MoS2 | hydrothermal | HER | ( |
| Pt | Mxene | electrochemical | HER | ( |
| Pt | N-doped graphene | ALD | HER | ( |
| Pd | GDY | electrochemical | HER | ( |
| Ru | CoFe-LDH | precipitation | OER | ( |
| Au | LDH | electrochemical | OER | ( |
| Ni, Co, Fe | NHGFs | annealing | OER | ( |
| Ru | N-doped carbon | pyrolysis | ORR | ( |
| Pt | N-doped carbon | pyrolysis | ORR | ( |
| Fe | N-doped carbon | pyrolysis | ORR | ( |
| Ni | N-doped carbon | pyrolysis | CO2RR | ( |
| Nb | MoS2 | CVD | CO2RR | ( |
Figure 2(a) Schematic presentation of electrochemical synthesis of Mo2TiC2T–PtSA. (b) HAADF-STEM image of Mo2TiC2T–PtSA. (c) LSV curve of Mo2TiC2T with different potential cycles by Pt counter electrode. (d) HER polarization curves for different synthesized catalysts. (e) Corresponding Tafel slopes. (f) Durability test of Mo2TiC2T–PtSA. Reprinted with permission from ref (12).
Figure 3(a) Schematic illustration showing the hydrolysis deposition to form Ru/CoFe-LDHs. (b) HAADF-STEM image of as-synthesized Ru/CoFe-LDHs (scale bar, 2 nm). (c) HER polarization curves of synthesized catalysts. (d) Durability test of the catalysts. Reprinted with permission from ref (14).
Figure 4(a) HAADF-STEM images of Ru-SSC catalysts. The red circle indicates the Ru single atom decorated on the carbon framework. (b) ORR activity of different synthesized catalysts. (c) ORR stability plots. (d) Gibbs free energy diagram for different catalysts. Reprinted wit permission from ref (23).
Figure 5(a) Schematic illustration of the topochemical synthesis of Ni–N4–C catalysts. (b) HAADF-STEM image of Ni–N4–C catalysts. (c) CO2RR polarization curve of as-synthesized catalysts. (d) Faradaic efficiencies for the formation CO. Reprinted with permission from ref (25).