| Literature DB >> 32010473 |
Yong-Seob Jeong1, Kum-Kang So2, Ju-Hee Lee1, Jung-Mi Kim3, Gie-Taek Chun4, Jeesun Chun2, Dae-Hyuk Kim2.
Abstract
Statistical experimental methods were used to optimize the medium for mass production of a novel laccase3 (Lac3) by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae TYEGLAC3-1. The basic medium was composed of glucose, casamino acids, yeast nitrogen base without amino acids (YNB w/o AA), tryptophan, and adenine. A one-factor-at-a-time approach followed by the fractional factorial design identified galactose, glutamic acid, and ammonium sulfate, as significant carbon, nitrogen, and mineral sources, respectively. The steepest ascent method and response surface methodology (RSM) determined that the optimal medium was (g/L): galactose, 19.16; glutamic acid, 5.0; and YNB w/o AA, 10.46. In this medium, the Lac3 activity (277.04 mU/mL) was 13.5 times higher than that of the basic medium (20.50 mU/mL). The effect of temperature, pH, agitation (rpm), and aeration (vvm) was further examined in a batch fermenter. The best Lac3 activity was 1176.04 mU/mL at 25 °C, pH 3.5, 100 rpm, and 1 vvm in batch culture.Entities:
Keywords: Cryphonectria parasitica; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; fermentation; laccase3; response surface methodology
Year: 2019 PMID: 32010473 PMCID: PMC6968546 DOI: 10.1080/12298093.2019.1661566
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mycobiology ISSN: 1229-8093 Impact factor: 1.858
The Plackett–Burman design for five variables.
| Trial | Variables | Lac3 (mU/mL) | DCWa (g/L) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | E | |||
| M1 | + | − | + | − | − | 159.17 | 6.06 |
| M2 | + | + | − | + | − | 121.13 | 6.11 |
| M3 | − | + | + | − | + | 160.95 | 5.87 |
| M4 | + | − | + | + | − | 158.75 | 6.36 |
| M5 | + | + | − | + | + | 120.30 | 5.92 |
| M6 | + | + | + | − | + | 163.91 | 6.89 |
| M7 | − | + | + | + | − | 160.89 | 6.09 |
| M8 | − | − | + | + | + | 153.58 | 5.89 |
| M9 | − | − | − | + | + | 110.98 | 5.18 |
| M10 | + | − | − | − | + | 112.95 | 5.64 |
| M11 | − | + | − | − | − | 120.84 | 4.98 |
| M12 | − | − | − | − | − | 111.09 | 5.04 |
A: galactose (+: 24 g/L, −: 16 g/L); B: glutamic acid (+: 6 g/L, −: 4 g/L); C: yeast nitrogen base w/o amino acids (+: 8.04 g/L, −: 5.36 g/L); D: tryptophan(+: 0.045 g/L, −: 0.015 g/L); E: adenine(+: 0.045 g/L, −: 0.015 g/L).
DCW indicates dry cell weight.
Experimental design for the optimization of Lac3 production medium through the steepest ascent method (SAM).
| Galactose | Glutamic acid | Yeast nitrogen base w/o amino acids | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Center point | 20 | 5 | 6.7 |
| Origin step | 4 | 1 | 1.34 |
| Main effect | −16.81 | 0.17 | 67.2 |
| Coefficient | −8.405 | 0.085 | 33.6 |
| 4.335 | |||
| Slope value | −1.052 | 0.011 | 4.206 |
| New step | −4.208 | 0.011 | 5.636 |
Run table of the experimental design for the optimization of Lac3 production medium through the steepest ascent method (SAM).
| No. | Galactose (g/L) | Glutamic acid (g/L) | Yeast nitrogen base w/o amino acids (g/L) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Center point | 20 | 5 | 6.7 |
| 1 | 19.160 | 5.002 | 7.826 |
| 2 | 18.320 | 5.004 | 8.952 |
| 3 | 17.480 | 5.006 | 10.078 |
| 4 | 16.640 | 5.008 | 11.204 |
| 5 | 15.800 | 5.010 | 12.330 |
Concentration of the respective medium components at each level (central composite design for the response surface method).
| Independent variables | Level (g/L) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| − | −1 | 0 | +1 | + | ||
| Galactose | 12.72 | 15.33 | 19.16 | 22.99 | 25.61 | |
| Glutamic acid | 3.32 | 4.00 | 5.00 | 6.00 | 6.68 | |
| Yeast nitrogen base w/o amino acids | 5.196 | 6.26 | 7.83 | 9.40 | 10.46 | |
α: 1.682.
Experimental matrix for the central composite design experiment and determined Lac3 production and dry cell weight in TYEGLAC3-1 cells.
| Exp No. | Culture condition | Predicted Lac3 (mU/mL) | Experimental Lac3 (mU/mL) | DCW (g/L) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galactose | Glutamic acid | Yeast nitrogen base w/o amino acids | ||||
| 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 121.56 | 130.43 | 5.68 |
| 2 | +1 | −1 | −1 | 116.82 | 129.52 | 5.10 |
| 3 | −1 | +1 | −1 | 142.80 | 156.52 | 5.18 |
| 4 | +1 | +1 | −1 | 143.87 | 154.22 | 5.23 |
| 5 | −1 | −1 | +1 | 200.74 | 197.11 | 5.76 |
| 6 | +1 | −1 | +1 | 192.52 | 185.55 | 5.93 |
| 7 | −1 | +1 | +1 | 204.11 | 198.15 | 5.73 |
| 8 | +1 | +1 | +1 | 201.89 | 199.95 | 6.06 |
| 9 | −α | 0 | 0 | 172.85 | 168.51 | 5.39 |
| 10 | +α | 0 | 0 | 166.87 | 161.79 | 6.13 |
| 11 | 0 | −α | 0 | 121.49 | 117.99 | 6.33 |
| 12 | 0 | +α | 0 | 147.07 | 140.43 | 6.41 |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | −α | 147.82 | 123.81 | 5.83 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | +α | 262.87 | 277.04 | 6.64 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 239.54 | 238.93 | 5.77 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 239.54 | 246.39 | 5.79 |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 239.54 | 234.95 | 5.72 |
Each variable of culture conditions was studied at five levels (+α, +1, 0, −1, and −α): for galactose: 25.61, 22.99, 19.16, 15.33, and 12.72 g/L; glutamic acid: 6.68, 6, 5, 4, and 3.32 g/L; and YNB w/o AA: 10.46, 9.40, 7.83, 6.26, and 5.196 g/L.
Analysis of Lac3 shown in Table 1.
| A | B | C | D | E | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ∑(H) | 836.20 | 848.02 | 957.25 | 825.64 | 822.67 |
| ∑(L) | 818.34 | 806.51 | 697.29 | 828.90 | 831.87 |
| Difference | 17.87 | 41.51 | 259.96 | −3.27 | −9.20 |
| Effect | 2.98 | 6.92 | 43.33 | −0.54 | −1.53 |
| Mean square | 26.60 | 143.59 | 5631.51 | 0.89 | 7.06 |
H and L represent data using high and low levels, respectively.
Experimental matrix for the three-factor fractional factorial design (FFD) and Lac3 production in TYEGLAC3-1 cells.
| A | B | C | Lac3 (mU/mL) | DCWa (g/L) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | − | − | − | 133.76 | 0.71 |
| 2 | + | − | − | 99.25 | 0.72 |
| 3 | − | + | − | 101.71 | 0.7 |
| 4 | + | + | − | 160.13 | 0.77 |
| 5 | − | − | + | 243.29 | 0.83 |
| 6 | + | − | + | 152.61 | 0.98 |
| 7 | − | + | + | 184.10 | 0.87 |
| 8 | + | + | + | 183.63 | 0.89 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 193.45 | 0.82 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 198.83 | 0.82 |
A: galactose (+: 24 g/L, 0: 20 g/L, and −: 16 g/L); B: glutamic acid (+: 6 g/L, 0: 5 g/L, −: 4 g/L); C: yeast nitrogen base w/o amino acids (+: 8.04 g/L, 0: 6.7 g/L, −: 5.36 g/L).
DCW indicates dry cell weight.
Figure 1.Three-dimensional mesh plot and 2 D contour plot of Lac3 production. (a) The effect of galactose (A) and glutamic acid (B) on Lac3 production with other components set at center level; (b) The effect of galactose (A) and YNB w/o AA (C) on Lac3 production with other components set at center level; (c) The effect of glutamic acid (B) and YNB w/o AA (C) on Lac3 production with other components set at center level.