| Literature DB >> 32010423 |
Adebola Onanuga1,2, Jaspreet Mahindroo2, Shreya Singh2, Neelam Taneja2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Multidrug resistance among Escherichia coli causing Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) is a major public health problem, threatening the effective treatment of UTIs. This study investigated the phenotypic and molecular characteristics of E. coli associated with UTIs in Port-Harcourt, Nigeria.Entities:
Keywords: Escherichia coli; Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamases; gentamicin; multi-drug resistance; quinolone; resistance genes; urinary tract infections
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 32010423 PMCID: PMC6969895 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2019.34.144.18182
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pan Afr Med J
Primers used for PCR amplification and sequencing
| Gene Target | Primer sequence (5' → 3') | Amplicon size (bp) | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| F - ATGAAAAACACAATACATATCAACTTCGC | 820 | Peirano | |
| R - GTGTGTTTAGAATGGTGATCGCATT | |||
| F - AAATCGTTATGCTGCGCTCT | 332 | Taneja | |
| R - CCGATCCTAGCTCAAACAGC | |||
| F - AGCCGCTTGAGCAAATTAAA | 318 | Taneja | |
| R - CGCTGTTATCGCTCATGGTA | |||
| F - ATGAGTATTCAACATTTCCCG | 859 | Peirano | |
| R - ACCAATGCTTAATCAGTGAG | |||
| F - CCAGAATCAGCGGCGCACGA | 587 | Taneja | |
| R - GCGCTTTGCGATGTGCAGCA | |||
| F - AAACC TGTTCAGCGCCGCATT | 395 | Vila | |
| R - GTGGTGCCGTTAAG CAAA | |||
| F - TACACCGG TCAACATTGAGG | 648 | Chu | |
| R - TTAATGATTGCCGCCGTC GG | |||
| F - GATCGTGAAAGCCAGAAAGG | 469 | Robicsek | |
| R - ACGATGCCTGGTAGTTGTCC | |||
| F - CGAGATCAATTTACGGGG | 582 | Robicsek | |
| R - AACAAGCTGAAGCGCCTG | |||
| F - TGGAAACCTACAATCATA | 656 | Robicsek | |
| R - TTAGTCAGGATAAACAAC | |||
| F - ATCTCATATCGTCGAGTG | 376 | This study | |
| R - CGCTTTCTCGTAGCATCG | |||
| F - GAACAAGATGGATTGCACGC | 688 | This study | |
| R - GCTCTTCAGCAATATCACGG | |||
| F - CATCATGAGGGAAGCGGTG | 787 | This study | |
| R - GACTACCTTGGTGATCTCG | |||
| F - GTACGGCTCCGCAGTGGATGGCGG | 537 | This study | |
| R - GCCCAGTCGGCAGCGACATCCTTC | |||
| F - CGGAAGGCAATAACGGAG | 740 | This study | |
| R - TCGAACAGGTAGCACTGAG | |||
| F - GTGTGCTGCTGGTCCACAGC | 628 | This study | |
| R - AGTTGACCCAGGGCTGTCGC |
Figure 1Antimicrobial resistance profile of urinary tract isolates of Escherichia coli
Antimicrobial resistant pattern of ESBL and Non-ESBL producing E. coli isolates
| Antimicrobial agents | Resistant isolates (%) n = 25 | ESBL (%) n = 6 | Non-ESBL (%) n = 19 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cefoperazone | 6 (30.8) | 4 (66.7) | 2 (10.5) | 0.015 |
| Cefotaxime | 5 (38.5) | 4 (66.7) | 1 (5.3) | 0.005 |
| Taxobactam/Piperacillin | 2 (15.4) | 0 | 0 | NA |
| Gentamicin | 11 (76.9) | 4 (66.7) | 7 (36.8) | 0.350 |
| Co-trimoxazole | 19 (100) | 6 (100) | 13 (68.4) | 0.278 |
| Nalidixic acid | 17 (100) | 4 (66.7) | 13 (68.4) | 1.000 |
| Norfloxacin | 15 (100) | 4 (66.7) | 11 (57.9) | 1.000 |
| Ciprofloxacin | 15 (92.3) | 4 (66.7) | 11 (57.9) | 1.000 |
| MDR | 13 (52.0) | 4 (66.7) | 9 (47.4) | 0.645 |
P value (from Fisher’s exact test) is the comparison of resistance of ESBL and non-ESBL producers
= Statistically significant (P ≤ 0.05)
NA = Not applicable
Figure 2Representative gel for the detection of blaTEM and blaCTXM-15 genes
Results of phenotypic and molecular detection of resistance in strains of E. coli causing UTIs
| Strain Code | Antibiogram Patterns | MIC (μg/ml) | Phenotypic | Genotypic | Other Resistance genes | ORDR | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIP | GEN | ESBLs | AmpC | pAmpC | ESBLs | PMQRs | AGS | ||||
| P1 | NA, NOR, CIP, GEN, | 32 | 512 | NEG | NEG | Negative | Negative | ND | ND | ||
| P2 | NA, NOR, CIP, GEN, COT | 32 | 256 | NEG | NEG | Negative | Negative | ND | ND | ||
| P3 | CFT, CFP, NA, NOR, CIP, GEN, COT | 256 | 256 | POS | NEG | Negative | Negative | POS | POS | ||
| P6 | NA, COT | 0.25 | 0.5 | NEG | NEG | Negative | Negative | ND | POS | POS | |
| P7 | Fully susceptible | 0.125 | 0.5 | NEG | NEG | Negative | POS | POS | |||
| P8 | NA, NOR, CIP, | 256 | 1 | NEG | NEG | Negative | ND | ND | ND | ||
| P9 | TZP, NA, NOR, CIP, COT | 512 | 2 | NEG | NEG | ND | POS | POS | |||
| P10 | COT | 0.125 | 1 | NEG | NEG | Negative | ND | ND | |||
| P11 | CFT, CFP, NA, NOR, CIP, GEN, COT | 512 | 32 | POS | NEG | Negative | POS | POS | |||
| P12 | CFT, CFP, COT | 1 | 1 | POS | NEG | Negative | Negative | ND | ND | ND | |
| P13 | CFP, NA, COT | 1 | 2 | NEG | NEG | Negative | Negative | ND | POS | POS | |
| P14 | COT | 0.125 | 1 | POS | NEG | Negative | ND | ND | ND | ||
| P15 | COT | 0.125 | 2 | NEG | NEG | Negative | Negative | ND | ND | ND | |
| P16 | NA, NOR, CIP | 32 | 1 | NEG | NEG | Negative | NEG | Negative | Negative | ND | ND |
| P19 | CFT, CFP, TZP, NA, NOR, CIP, COT | 512 | 4 | NEG | NEG | Negative | ND | ND | ND | ||
| P20 | Fully susceptible | 1 | 1 | NEG | NEG | Negative | Negative | ND | POS | POS | |
| P21A | NA, NOR, CIP, GEN, COT | 256 | 256 | POS | NEG | Negative | ND | ND | |||
| P21B | NA, NOR, CIP, GEN, COT | 256 | 128 | NEG | NEG | Negative | ND | ND | |||
| P22 | COT | 0.125 | 1 | NEG | NEG | Negative | ND | ND | ND | ||
| P23 | NA, NOR, CIP, GEN, COT | 256 | 64 | NEG | NEG | Negative | ND | ND | |||
| P24 | NA, NOR, CIP, GEN, COT | 256 | 128 | NEG | NEG | Negative | Negative | ND | ND | ||
| P25 | NA, NOR, CIP, GEN, COT | 256 | 128 | NEG | NEG | Negative | ND | ND | |||
| P26 | CFT, CFP, NA, NOR, CIP, GEN, COT | 256 | 256 | POS | NEG | POS | POS | ||||
| P28 | NA, NOR, CIP, GEN, COT | 256 | 128 | NEG | NEG | Negative | Negative | ND | ND | ||
| P29 | Fully susceptible | 1 | 2 | NEG | NEG | Negative | Negative | ND | ND | ||
CFT, cefotaxime; CFP, cepoferazone; TZP, taxobactam/piperacillin; NA, nalidix acid; NOR, norfloxacin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; GEN, gentamicin; COT, co-trimoxazole; ND; not determined; AGS, aminoglycosides; POS, positive; NEG, negative
Figure 3Representative gel for the detection of aacC2 aminoglycoside gene