| Literature DB >> 32010244 |
Kai Lu1, Yue Zhao1, Jia Chen2, Dayi Hu1, Hua Xiao1.
Abstract
The present study aimed to examine the separate and combined association of self-reported sleep duration and quality with the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in adult Chinese males. A total of 4,144 subjects were enrolled in the present crossed-sectional study. All participants were subjected to anthropometric measurements, blood tests and a survey based on a standardized questionnaire. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the influence of sleep duration and quality on the prevalence of MetS. The group that had 7 h of sleep had the best results as compared with those with shorter or longer sleep durations, and the prevalence of MetS was the lowest in this group. In addition, poor vs. good sleep quality was associated with an increased risk of MetS. Further analysis suggested that sleep duration and quality had an additive effect on the prevalence of MetS. In conclusion, sleep duration as well as quality should be considered when exploring the potential association between sleep and other conditions. Copyright: © Lu et al.Entities:
Keywords: metabolic syndrome; sleep duration; sleep quality
Year: 2019 PMID: 32010244 PMCID: PMC6966124 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2019.8290
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Basic characteristics of adult Chinese male participants according to sleep duration.
| Sleep duration (h) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item | <6 (n=356) | 6 (n=1,021) | 7 (n=1,446) | 8 (n=1,082) | >8 (n=239) | Total (n=4,144) | P-value |
| Age (years) | 47.91±0.37 | 46.84±0.23 | 46.92±0.18 | 46.98±0.41 | 47.47±0.42 | 47.04±0.14 | 0.33 |
| WC (cm) | 91.73±6.02 | 88.71±4.11 | 88.78±4.10 | 89.03±4.37 | 91.27±5.68 | 88.94±4.21) | <0.01 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.45±0.19 | 25.17±0.11 | 25.44±0.10 | 25.19±0.10 | 25.05±0.19 | 25.28±0.06 | 0.16 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 130.61±0.71 | 129.79±0.47 | 129.96±0.38 | 129.62±0.44 | 131.84±0.81 | 130.02±0.22 | 0.18 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 85.87±0.47 | 85.9±0.31 | 85.80±0.25 | 85.71±0.30 | 86.86±0.55 | 85.88±0.15 | 0.50 |
| TG (mmol/l) | 2.03±0.12 | 1.95±0.03 | 1.84±0.06 | 1.89±0.07 | 1.95±0.12 | 1.90±0.04 | 0.07 |
| HDL-C (mmol/l) | 1.33±0.02 | 1.34±0.02 | 1.34±0.01 | 1.35±0.01 | 1.37±0.02 | 1.33±0.01 | 0.53 |
| FBG (mmol/l) | 5.57±0.08 | 5.41±0.05 | 5.43±0.0 | 5.5±0.05 | 5.29±0.07 | 5.45±0.02 | 0.08 |
| Previous hypertension | 72 (20.2) | 157 (15.4) | 201 (13.9) | 120 (11.1) | 34 (14.3) | 584 (14.1) | <0.01 |
| Previous diabetes | 52 (14.6) | 85 (8.3) | 103 (7.1) | 80 (7.4) | 24 (10.2) | 344 (8.3) | <0.01 |
| GAD-7 score | 4.40±0.28 | 3.35±0.15 | 1.63±0.08 | 1.51±0.09 | 1.93±0.30 | 2.27±0.06 | <0.01 |
| PHQ-9 score | 5.06±0.32 | 3.29±0.16 | 2.02±0.10 | 1.63±0.10 | 2.25±0.32 | 2.48±0.07 | <0.01 |
| Current smoking | 215 (60.5) | 611 (59.8) | 781 (54.0) | 576 (53.2) | 133 (55.8) | 2316 (55.9) | <0.01 |
| Current drinking | 115 (32.2) | 289 (28.3) | 320 (22.1) | 285 (26.2) | 62 (25.9) | 1071 (25.8) | <0.01 |
| Active exercise habit | 109 (30.6) | 311 (30.5) | 508 (35.1) | 392 (36.2) | 59 (24.6) | 1379 (33.3) | <0.01 |
| High level of education | 140 (39.4) | 415 (40.6) | 450 (31.1) | 413 (38.2) | 92 (38.7) | 1510 (36.4) | <0.01 |
Values are expressed as mean ± standard error or n (%). WC, waist circumference; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; TG, serum triglyceride; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; FBG, fasting blood glucose; GAD-7, General Anxiety Disorder-7; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire-9.
Basic characteristics of adult Chinese male participants according to sleep quality.
| Sleep quality | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item | Very good (n=2,369) | Good (n=1,146) | Poor (n=468) | Very poor (n=191) | Total (n=4,144) | P-value |
| Age (years) | 47.20±0.14 | 46.38±0.40 | 47.48±0.36 | 47.34±0.52 | 47.01±0.14 | 0.06 |
| WC (cm) | 88.72±4.19 | 89.21±4.11 | 90.41±5.13 | 92.01±5.73 | 88.94±4.21 | <0.01 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.26±0.08 | 25.33±0.11 | 25.41±0.18 | 25.01±0.23 | 25.29±0.06 | 0.58 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 130.53±0.30 | 129.16±0.42 | 130.16±0.69 | 128.32±1.04 | 130.01±0.23 | 0.02 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 86.24±0.20 | 85.32±0.28 | 85.69±0.48 | 85.38±0.7 | 85.89±0.15 | 0.05 |
| TC (mmol/l) | 2.02±0.03 | 1.94±0.09 | 1.89±0.12 | 2.01±0.12 | 1.90±0.04 | 0.09 |
| HDL-C (mmol/l) | 1.36±0.03 | 1.29±0.02 | 1.26±0.02 | 1.27±0.03 | 1.34±0.02 | 0.19 |
| FBG (mmol/l) | 5.47±0.03 | 5.44±0.05 | 5.38±0.06 | 5.42±0.10 | 5.45±0.02 | 0.68 |
| Previous hypertension | 296 (12.5) | 170 (14.8) | 74 (15.8) | 44 (23.0) | 584 (14.1) | <0.01 |
| Previous diabetes | 173 (7.3) | 93 (8.1) | 48 (10.3) | 30 (15.7) | 344 (8.3) | <0.01 |
| GAD-7 score | 1.15±0.06 | 3.06±0.12 | 4.54±0.26 | 6.4±0.43 | 2.27±0.06 | <0.01 |
| PHQ-9 score | 1.21±0.06 | 3.54±0.13 | 4.60±0.26 | 7.9±0.53 | 2.48±0.07 | <0.01 |
| Current smoking | 1,279 (54.0) | 662 (57.8) | 256 (54.7) | 119 (62.2) | 2,316 (55.9) | 0.04 |
| Current drinking | 572 (24.1) | 289 (25.2) | 132 (28.3) | 78 (40.8) | 1,071 (25.8) | <0.01 |
| Active exercise habit | 785 (33.1) | 416 (36.3) | 126 (26.9) | 52 (27.2) | 1,379 (33.3) | <0.01 |
| High level of education | 811 (34.2) | 452 (39.4) | 162 (34.7) | 85 (44.4) | 1,510 (36.4) | <0.01 |
Values are expressed as mean ± standard error or n (%). WC, waist circumference; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; TG, serum triglyceride; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; FBG, fasting blood glucose; GAD-7, General AnxietyDisorder-7; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire-9.
Figure 1.Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in participants with different combinations of sleep duration and sleep quality. The number at the bottom of each column indicates the sample size for the respective column.
Logistic regression analysis of the influence of sleep duration and sleep quality on the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in adult Chinese males.
| A, Influence of sleep duration | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sleep duration (h) | n | Unadjusted OR (95%CI) | P-value | Adjusted OR (95%CI)[ | P-value |
| <6 | 356 | 1.55 (1.23–1.92) | – | 1.57 (1.26–1.95) | – |
| 6 | 1,021 | 1.23 (1.12–1.36) | <0.00 | 1.26 (1.14–1.39) | <0.00 |
| 7 | 1,446 | Reference | – | Reference | – |
| 8 | 1,082 | 1.24 (1.13–1.35) | <0.00 | 1.21 (1.11–1.32) | <0.00 |
| >8 | 239 | 1.29 (1.03–1.60) | P-value | 1.32 (1.06–1.65) | P-value |
| Very good | 2,369 | Reference | – | Reference | – |
| Good | 1,146 | 1.15 (1.02–1.30) | <0.00 | 1.12 (1.01–1.23) | <0.00 |
| Poor | 438 | 1.21 (1.03–1.42) | <0.00 | 1.20 (1.02–1.40) | <0.00 |
| Very poor | 191 | 1.53 (1.23–1.92) | <0.00 | 1.51 (1.21–1.88) | <0.00 |
Adjusted for age, body mass index, status of smoking and drinking, exercise habit, educational level, and score of anxiety and depression. Sleep quality was evaluated by the standard Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and is categorized based on total score. CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
Logistic regression analysis of the influence of different combinations of sleep duration and quality on the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in adult Chinese males.
| A, Unadjusted analysis | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sleep duration (h) | ||||||||||
| <6 | 6 | 7 | 8 | >8 | ||||||
| Sleep quality | n | OR (95% CI) | n | OR (95% CI) | n | OR (95% CI) | n | OR (95% CI) | n | OR (95% CI) |
| Very good | 122 | 1.54 (1.25–1.90)[ | 484 | 1.27 (1.16–1.39)[ | 842 | Reference | 755 | 1.23 (0.11–1.38)[ | 166 | 1.34 (1.10–1.63)[ |
| Good | 111 | 1.62 (1.28–1.84)[ | 316 | 1.36 (1.15–1.55)[ | 417 | 1.16 (1.05–1.30)[ | 256 | 1.32 (1.17–1.50)[ | 46 | 1.41 (1.14–1.75)[ |
| Poor and very poor | 123 | 2.21 (1.62–3.06)[ | 221 | 1.47 (1.20–1.65)[ | 187 | 1.38 (1.13–1.68)[ | 71 | 1.50 (1.21–1.90)[ | 27 | 1.98 (1.40–2.78)[ |
| Very good | 122 | 1.52 (1.23–1.88)[ | 484 | 1.24 (1.14–1.36)[ | 842 | Reference | 755 | 1.25 (1.12–1.39)[ | 166 | 1.37 (1.11–1.67)[ |
| Good | 111 | 1.64 (1.30–1.86)[ | 316 | 1.33 (1.13–1.52)[ | 417 | 1.17 (1.05–1.31)[ | 256 | 1.30 (1.15–1.46)[ | 46 | 1.39 (1.13–1.73)[ |
| Poor and very poor | 123 | 2.25 (1.60–3.03)[ | 221 | 1.49 (1.21–1.67)[ | 187 | 1.34 (1.09–1.63)[ | 71 | 1.52 (1.22–1.93)[ | 27 | 2.03 (1.45–2.86)[ |
Adjusted for age, body mass index, status of smoking and drinking, exercise habit, educational level, and score of anxiety and depression.
P<0.01
P<0.05
P>0.05. Sleep quality was evaluated by the standard Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and is categorized based on total score. CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.