Literature DB >> 32010228

Long head of biceps tenodesis at the superior aspect of the biceps groove: A biomechanical comparison of inlay and onlay techniques.

Paul J Cagle1, Daniel A London1, Matthew J Gluck1, Sabrina Morel1, Bradford O Parsons1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pathology involving the long head of the biceps tendon is a common source of shoulder pain. Biceps tenodesis has been successfully used in areas below the pectoralis, above the pectoralis, and above the biceps groove. However, clinical data are lacking for additional techniques for tenodesis at the superior aspect of the biceps groove.
METHODS: A biomechanical comparison was completed examining six matched pairs of cadaveric shoulders. The ultimate load to failure was compared between an inlay and onlay biceps tenodesis at the superior aspect of the biceps groove.
RESULTS: The results demonstrate an average construct strength of 215 N for the inlay technique and 210 N for the onlay technique. The difference between the two techniques was not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates similar biomechanical strength for both constructs.
© 2018 The British Elbow & Shoulder Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biceps inlay; biceps onlay; biceps tendinitis; biceps tenodesis; interference screw; long head biceps

Year:  2018        PMID: 32010228      PMCID: PMC6974887          DOI: 10.1177/1758573218815281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shoulder Elbow        ISSN: 1758-5732


  23 in total

Review 1.  Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Nicholas R Slenker; Kevin Lawson; Michael G Ciccotti; Christopher C Dodson; Steven B Cohen
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  The biomechanical evaluation of four fixation techniques for proximal biceps tenodesis.

Authors:  Augustus D Mazzocca; James Bicos; Stephen Santangelo; Anthony A Romeo; Robert A Arciero
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Suprapectoral biceps tenodesis: a biomechanical comparison of a new "soft anchor" tenodesis technique versus interference screw biceps tendon fixation.

Authors:  Massimiliano Baleani; Dunia Francesconi; Lorenzo Zani; Sandro Giannini; Stephen J Snyder
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Biomechanical evaluation of subpectoral biceps tenodesis: dual suture anchor versus interference screw fixation.

Authors:  Robert Z Tashjian; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Biomechanical evaluation of a unicortical button versus interference screw for subpectoral biceps tenodesis.

Authors:  Amarpal S Arora; Anshu Singh; Ryan C Koonce
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  A biomechanical analysis of two biceps tenodesis fixation techniques.

Authors:  David P Richards; Stephen S Burkhart
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 7.  Systematic Review of Biceps Tenodesis: Arthroscopic Versus Open.

Authors:  Vineet Thomas Abraham; Bryan H M Tan; V Prem Kumar
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Arthroscopic suprapectoral and open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: a comparison of restoration of length-tension and mechanical strength between techniques.

Authors:  Brian C Werner; Matthew L Lyons; Cody L Evans; Justin W Griffin; Joseph M Hart; Mark D Miller; Stephen F Brockmeier
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Biceps tenodesis: a biomechanical study of fixation methods.

Authors:  T Jayamoorthy; John R Field; John J Costi; David K Martin; Richard M Stanley; Trevor C Hearn
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Biceps Tenotomy Versus Tenodesis in Active Patients Younger Than 55 Years: Is There a Difference in Strength and Outcomes?

Authors:  Jamie L Friedman; Jennifer L FitzPatrick; Lucas S Rylander; Christine Bennett; Armando F Vidal; Eric C McCarty
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2015-02-12
View more
  2 in total

1.  Arthroscopic Onlay Articular Margin Biceps Tenodesis for Long Head of the Biceps Tendon Pathology.

Authors:  Paul J Cagle; Ryley K Zastrow; Jimmy J Chan; Akshar V Patel; Bradford O Parsons
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2020-06-18

2.  Histopathology of long head of biceps tendon removed during tenodesis demonstrates degenerative histopathology and not inflammatory changes.

Authors:  Maciej J K Simon; Jane Yeoh; Jennifer Nevin; Michael Nimmo; William D Regan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 2.362

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.