| Literature DB >> 32010057 |
Bo Du1, Jianzhong Xu1, Jintao Hu2, Xianliang Zhong1, Jian Liang3, Pengfei Lei1, Hao Wang1, Weichun Li1, Yuping Peng4, Aijun Shan1, Yujuan Zhang5.
Abstract
Objective: The surgical technique, safety, efficacy, and clinical application value of the intra-neuroendoscopic technique (INET) for the treatment of subacute-chronic and chronic septal subdural hematoma was investigated based on the structure and pathological features of the hematoma wall, and the critical factors of hematoma growth and recurrence were determined, in order to provide reference for clinical drug treatment.Entities:
Keywords: chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH); inflammatory factor; intra-neuroendoscopic technique (INET); pathology; prognosis; transparent sheath
Year: 2020 PMID: 32010057 PMCID: PMC6979069 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01408
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Comparison of pre-operative baseline data between the INET and control groups.
| Sex (Male/Female) | 29/16 | 30/19 | 0.75 |
| Age (Years) | 73.2 ± 5.5 | 70.6 ± 6.1 | 0.17 |
| Age ≤65 years [n(%)] | 9 (20.0%) | 20 (40.8%) | 0.03 |
| A definitive history of trauma [n(%)] | 37 (82.2%) | 34 (69.4%) | 0.15 |
| Unilateral subdural hemorrhage [n(%)] | 38 (84.4%) | 32 (65.3%) | 0.03 |
| Midline shift (mm) | 9.6 ± 3.1 | 8.8 ± 3.8 | 0.52 |
| Hematoma volume (ml) | 96.8 ± 19.2 | 104.3 ± 21.3 | 0.36 |
| Use of anticoagulant/antiplatelet drugs [ | 23 (51.1%) | 30 (61.2%) | 0.32 |
| Hypertension | 32 (71.1%) | 28 (57.1%) | 0.16 |
| Diabetes | 22 (48.9%) | 30 (61.2%) | 0.23 |
| Stroke | 17 (37.8%) | 14 (28.6%) | 0.47 |
| Grade I | 9 (20.0%) | 15 (30.6%) | 0.24 |
| Grade II | 24 (53.3%) | 26 (53.1%) | 0.67 |
| Grade III | 12 (26.7%) | 8 (16.3%) | 0.22 |
Figure 1Transparent sheath and neuroendoscope before (a) and after (b) assembly.
Figure 2The midpoint of the surgical incision is generally 3–4 cm in front of the apical nodule. The direction of the incision is parallel to the scalp vessel, and the incision is in an “S” shape with a length of 4–5 cm (a,b). After a hole is drilled in the skull, a small bone flap with a diameter of 2.0–3.0 cm is cut using a milling cutter (c). The wall envelop of the hematoma sac can be seen using a cross-shaped incision after lifting the dura mater (d).
Figure 3The hemorrhage sites inside the hematoma cavity are usually located at the folding point of the visceral layer and wall layer of the sac. The hemorrhage site (a) is identified after clearing the hematoma using an aspirator. Bleeding is precisely stopped using a specialized bipolar electrocoagulator on the endoscope (b,c). After hemostasis, the hematoma cavity is washed with warm saline to confirm hemostasis (d).
Figure 4Neuroendoscopic observation of the hematoma with “separation,” as determined by pre-operative CT, shows that the “separation” is mainly a separation lock column (a,b) or separation strip (c,d) instead of a real closed septum. The relative separation is sufficient to block the blood clot in the chamber. Conventional BHD is not sufficient to completely drain the hematoma, but INET is able to remove the separation strip or separation lock column and visually clean the old blood clots.
Comparison of intraoperative and post-operative clinical indicators between the INET and control groups.
| Surgery duration (min) | 60.4 ± 10.6 | 44.1 ± 9.8 | 0.00 |
| SDT placement duration (d) | 2.1 ± 0.6 | 3.9 ± 0.7 | 0.00 |
| Intracranial infection rate | 2 (4.4%) | 5 (10.2%) | 0.50 |
| Recurrence rate (6 months) | 2 (4.4%) | 12 (24.5%) | 0.00 |
| Overall effective rate | 95.6% | 87.8% | 0.32 |
| Grade 0 | 39 (86.7%) | 33 (67.3%) | 0.03 |
| Grade I | 5 (11.1%) | 11 (22.4%) | 0.14 |
| Grade II | 1 (2.2%) | 5 (10.2%) | 0.25 |
Continuous variables are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, and categorical variables are presented as count (percentage).
Comparison of test indicators between subdural hematoma fluid and peripheral venous blood.
| Osmotic pressure (mOsm/kg) | 291.5 ± 12.4 | 296.7 ± 10.3 | 0.68 |
| IL-6 (pg/ml) | 58.6 ± 14.6 | 3365.8 ± 863.7 | 0.00 |
| D-dimer (ng/ml) | 2044.5 ± 218.3 | 1244236.8 ± 152545.6 | 0.00 |
Figure 5Pathological sections of the hematoma capsule: (a) HE-02-20X shows visible hemorrhage, vascular hyperplasia and inflammatory cell infiltration inside the capsule. (b) HE-03-40X shows visible hemorrhage and fibrovascular hyperplasia inside the capsule. (c) HE-04-40X shows visible inflammatory cell infiltration. (d) HE-05-40X shows visible neovascular rupture and bleeding.
Multiple logistic regression analysis results of the risk factors associated with post-operative hematoma recurrence.
| INET application (No) | Reference | ||
| INET application (Yes) | 3.71 | 1.31–9.62 | 0.02 |
| Age>65 years | Reference | ||
| Age ≤65 years | 1.51 | 1.05–2.87 | 0.03 |
| Bilateral subdural hematoma | Reference | ||
| Unilateral subdural hematoma | 1.76 | 1.05–3.41 | 0.02 |
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; P-value of Wald test.