| Literature DB >> 32009915 |
Péter Pelsőczi1,2, Kristóf Kelemen1, Cecília Csölle3, Gábor Nagy1, Balázs Lendvai4, Viktor Román3, György Lévay1,5.
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is characterized by impaired socio-communicational function, repetitive and restricted behaviors. Valproic acid (VPA) was reported to increase the prevalence of ASD in humans as a consequence of its use during pregnancy. VPA treatment also induces autistic-like behaviors in the offspring of rats after prenatal exposure; hence it is a preclinical disease model with high translational value. In the present study, our aim was to characterize ASD relevant behaviors of socially housed, individually identified male rats in automated home cages. The natural behavior of rats was assessed by monitoring their visits to drinking bottles in an environment without human influence aiming at reducing interventional stress. Although rodents normally tend to explore their new environment, prenatally VPA-treated rats showed a drastic impairment in initial and long-term exploratory behavior throughout their stay in the automated cage. Furthermore, VPA rats displayed psychogenic polydipsia (PPD) as well as altered circadian activity. In the competitive situation of strict water deprivation controls switched to an uneven resource sharing and only a few dominant animals had access to water. In VPA animals similar hierarchy-related changes were completely absent. While the control rats secured their chance to drink with frequent reentering visits, thereby "guarding" the water resource, VPA animals did not switch to uneven sharing and displayed no evidence of guarding behavior.Entities:
Keywords: autism spectrum disorder; exploratory behavior; hierarchy; polydipsia; prenatal exposure delayed effects; psychogenic; rats; valproate
Year: 2020 PMID: 32009915 PMCID: PMC6974458 DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00295
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Behav Neurosci ISSN: 1662-5153 Impact factor: 3.558
Figure 1Schematic representation of the experimental phases and visual description of the tasks.
Figure 2(A) Number of exploratory visits in control and VPA groups. 1, 2, indicate phases: Acclimation, Nosepoke learning. Time scale of exploratory visits summed in four-hour periods. Means (±SEM) are shown (p < 0.001). (B) Number of exploratory visits in control and VPA group. 1, 2, 3, 4 indicate phases: Acclimation, Nosepoke learning, Side preference learning, Competition. In acclimation, nosepoke learning and side preference learning VPA group showed a significant decrease in explorative visits (p < 0.001). (C) Cosinor analysis of circadian rhythm during acclimation. Mean (black line) and confidence interval (red dotted lines) are drawn for pooled group data. Time after light off values associated with maximum and minimum activity are shown with blue lines. ***p ≤ 0.001.
Figure 3Differences in drinking behavior. (A) The number of licks grouped for 4-h periods during acclimation. Mean, confidence interval and individual values are shown. The number of lick values is transformed for 1 h. Letters indicate the individual with the highest number of licks for each 4-h period. (B) Mean lick duration (±SEM) per visit during acclimation (p < 0.001). (C) Mean lick duration (±SEM) per visit during later phases (pooled). ***p ≤ 0.001.
Figure 4Inter-individual drinking behavior of treatment groups. (A) Distribution of cumulative lick number per hour. Rank abundance curves are drawn according to the model best fit the data: log-normal for control Akaike information criterion (AIC = 171.5) and broken stick for VPA group (AIC = 184.9). (B) Evenness (diversity divided by maximum diversity) values for groups and phases (daily mean ± SEM; ***p ≤ 0.001).
Figure 5Lack of social dominance in the VPA group. (A) Representative cage layouts for three individuals (ID presented at the bottom of the schematic cage) with the highest, median and lowest numbers of reentering visits for each treatment group (rows) during competition. Reentering visits are calculated for each subject as visits to the same corner when the subject left without other subjects entering the corner (numbers shown at the corners). The thickness of the arrows indicates the strength of the reentering visits. (B) Social dominance within the group is characterized by using a ratio of the maximum visits of an individual divided by the mean values of the group (±SEM) for daily cumulative reentering visits. Water limitation provoked the elevation of social dominance in the control group as compared to conditions with unlimited water access (effect size: 78.8%, ***p ≤ 0.001), whereas no significant effect was shown within the VPA group that remained at a dominance value below 2.