Literature DB >> 32009426

Retrospective cohort study of 68 sacral giant cell tumours treated with nerve-sparing surgery and evaluation on therapeutic benefits of denosumab therapy.

Chiao Yee Lim1,2, Xingyu Liu3, Fangzhou He3, Haijie Liang3, Yi Yang3, Tao Ji3, Rongli Yang3, Wei Guo3.   

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate the benefits of denosumab in combination with nerve-sparing surgery for treatment of sacral giant cell tumours (GCTs).
METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with GCT who presented between January 2011 and July 2017. Intralesional curettage was performed and patients treated from 2015 to 2017 also received denosumab therapy. The patients were divided into three groups: Cohort 1: control group (n = 36); cohort 2: adjuvant denosumab group (n = 9); and cohort 3: neo- and adjuvant-denosumab group (n = 17).
RESULTS: There were 68 patients within the study period. Six patients were lost to follow-up. The mean follow-up was 47.7 months (SD 23.2). Preoperative denosumab was found to reduce intraoperative haemorrhage and was associated with shorter operating time for tumour volume > 200 cm3. A total of 17 patients (27.4%) developed local recurrence. The locoregional control rate was 77.8% (7/9) and 87.5% (14/16) respectively for cohorts 2 and 3, in comparison to 66.7% (24/36) of the control group. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate was significantly higher for adjuvant denosumab group versus those without adjuvant denosumab during the first two years: 100% vs 83.8% at one year and 95.0% vs 70.3% at two years. No significant difference was found for the three-year RFS rate.
CONCLUSION: Preoperative denosumab therapy was found to reduce intraoperative haemorrhage and was associated with shorter operating times. Adjuvant denosumab was useful to prevent early recurrence during the first two years after surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(2):177-185.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Denosumab; Giant cell tumour; Intralesional curettage; Nerve-sparing surgery; Sacrum

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32009426     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B2.BJJ-2019-0813.R1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  5 in total

1.  En Bloc Resection of Giant Cell Tumor following Neoadjuvant Denosumab: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Sarah C Tepper; Ari M Spellman; Charles A Gusho; Alan T Blank
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-05-31

2.  Application of osteoinductive calcium phosphate ceramics in giant cell tumor of the sacrum: report of six cases.

Authors:  Yitian Wang; Xiangfeng Li; Yi Luo; Li Zhang; Hezhong Chen; Li Min; Qing Chang; Yong Zhou; Chongqi Tu; Xiangdong Zhu; Xingdong Zhang
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2022-04-11

3.  The Effect of Denosumab and Risk Factors for Recurrence in Spinal Giant Cell Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sung Hyun Noh; Yoon Ha; Pyung Goo Cho; Keung Nyun Kim; Dong Ah Shin; Sang Hyun Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 3.052

4.  Intralesional nerve-sparing surgery versus non-surgical treatment for giant cell tumor of the sacrum.

Authors:  Shinji Tsukamoto; Nikolin Ali; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Kanya Honoki; Yasuhito Tanaka; Paolo Spinnato; Davide Maria Donati; Costantino Errani
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  The Role of Denosumab for Surgical Outcomes in Patients with Giant Cell Tumour of Bone: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Abha Gupta; Lisa Durocher-Allen; Snezana Popovic; Richard Tozer; Xiaomei Yao; Michelle Ghert
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.677

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.