Literature DB >> 32008787

Regional environmental assessment of dairy farms.

C Alan Rotz1, Robert C Stout2, Michael A Holly3, Peter J A Kleinman2.   

Abstract

A comprehensive, yet in depth, assessment is needed of the environmental impacts of dairy farms at regional and national scales to better track improvements made by the industry. With Pennsylvania as an example, a method using process-level simulation and cradle-to-farm gate life cycle assessment was developed and used to assess important environmental footprints of dairy farms within a state. Representative dairy farms of various sizes and management practices throughout 7 regions of the state were simulated with the Integrated Farm System Model. Environmental footprints varied widely among farms, with this variation influenced primarily by soil characteristics and climate and secondarily by farm management. Therefore, prescriptive mitigation strategies for individual farms are more effective than uniform enforcement of specific strategies across the state. Footprints for the whole state were determined by totaling values among farms and regions based on the amounts of milk produced by each. Pennsylvania dairy farms were determined to emit 4,555 with an uncertainty of ±415 Gg of CO2 equivalent of greenhouse gas with an intensity of 0.99 ± 0.09 kg of CO2 equivalent/kg of fat- and protein-corrected milk (FPCM) produced. Fossil energy consumption was 12,324 ± 1,946 TJ or 2.69 ± 0.42 MJ/kg of FPCM. Blue (nonprecipitation) water consumption was 64.1 ± 13.5 Tg with an intensity of 14.0 ± 3.0 kg/kg of FPCM. A total of all forms of reactive N loss was 43.2 ± 5.0 Gg with an intensity of 9.4 ± 1.1 g/kg of FPCM. These metrics were equivalent to 1.6% of the greenhouse gas emissions, 0.4% of fossil energy use, and 0.8% of fresh water consumption reported for the state. Thus, greenhouse gas emissions, fossil energy use, and blue water use associated with dairy farm production are relatively small compared with total estimates for the state. Perhaps the greatest environmental concern is that of ammonia emission, where dairy farms accounted for about half the estimated emissions of the state. This method can be applied to assessments of the dairy industry at larger regional and national scales. The Authors. Published by FASS Inc. and Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Dairy Science Association®. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Entities:  

Keywords:  dairy farm; footprint; greenhouse gas; life cycle assessment; nitrogen loss

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32008787     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2019-17388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  3 in total

1.  Carbon Footprint Assessment of Spanish Dairy Cattle Farms: Effectiveness of Dietary and Farm Management Practices as a Mitigation Strategy.

Authors:  Ridha Ibidhi; Sergio Calsamiglia
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  Environmental life cycle assessment of cow milk in a conventional semi-intensive Brazilian production system.

Authors:  Laurine Santos Carvalho; Camila Daniele Willers; Bruna Borges Soares; Alex Rodrigues Nogueira; José Adolfo de Almeida Neto; Luciano Brito Rodrigues
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 5.190

3.  Canola Meal versus Soybean Meal as Protein Supplements in the Diets of Lactating Dairy Cows Affects the Greenhouse Gas Intensity of Milk.

Authors:  Lucia Holtshausen; Chaouki Benchaar; Roland Kröbel; Karen A Beauchemin
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 2.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.