Literature DB >> 32008556

Nodule Size Effect on Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography and Computed Tomography for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.

Jia-Wei Li1, Cai Chang1, Jia-Ying Chen2, Zhao-Ting Shi1, Min Chen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare the abilities of ultrasonography (US) and Computed Tomography (CT) to identify calcifications and to predict probability of malignancy for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma (PTC) and Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma (PTMC).
METHODS: We reviewed 1008 cases of PTC/PTMC with calcifications reported by pre-operative US, CT, or post-operative pathology. The size of the thyroid nodule was obtained from the US report and the maximum diameter (d) was documented. According to the nodule size (d), the PTC and PTMC groups were each divided into two subgroups, as follows: large PTC group (d ≥ 2 cm), small PTC group (1 cm < d < 2 cm), large PTMC group (0.6 cm ≤ d ≤ 1 cm), and small PTMC group (d < 0.6 cm).
RESULTS: In the 1008 patients, the ratio of females to males was 2.29 and the mean age was 40.9 years (standard deviation: 11.7 years). Of the 1008 records, 92.8% were found to have calcifications according to the US report, while 50.4% showed calcifications according to the CT report. This difference between US and CT reports was statistically significant (p < 0.0005). The percentages of US reports showing calcifications were similar for all four PTC and PTMC subgroups (93.7%, 94.3%, 92.1%, and 85.1%, respectively; p = 0.052), while the percentages of CT reports showing calcifications were significantly different among the PTC and PTMC subgroups (62.3%, 52.2%, 45.4%, and 31.3%, respectively; p < 0.0005). As for the prediction of malignancy, US was superior to CT in all four subgroups (large PTC group: 97.1% vs. 54.1%, small PTC group: 94.8% vs. 42.9%, large PTMC group: 97.2% vs. 32.0%, small PTMC group: 95.5% vs. 14.9%; p < 0.0005 for all pairwise comparisons). No significant difference was observed in terms of the ability of US to predict the malignancy of PTC versus PTMC (p = 0.31), while CT showed significant superiority in diagnosing PTC versus PTMC (p < 0.0005). The predictive value of CT for PTC declined as the nodule size decreased (p < 0.05 for all pairwise comparisons).
CONCLUSION: Our results showed that US detected calcifications and predicted the malignancy of all nodule sizes of thyroid papillary carcinoma equally well, while the performance of CT declined with the reduction of nodule size. Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nodule size; calcifications; computed tomography; papillary thyroid carcinoma; papillary thyroid microcarcinoma; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 32008556     DOI: 10.2174/1573405614666180425142141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Imaging Rev        ISSN: 1573-4056


  4 in total

1.  Clinical value of SMI Combined with Low-Dose CT Scanning in differential diagnosis of Thyroid Lesions and Tumor Staging.

Authors:  Shao-Wei Xue; Yu-Kun Luo; Zi-Yu Jiao; Lin Xu
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.088

2.  Comparison of Ultrasonography and CT for Determining the Preoperative Benign or Malignant Nature of Thyroid Nodules: Diagnostic Performance According to Calcification.

Authors:  Jian-Hui Wu; Wei Zeng; Ren-Guo Wu; Mei Wang; Fei Ye; Min-Yi Fu
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

3.  Differential diagnosis of non-diffuse primary thyroid lymphoma and papillary thyroid carcinoma by ultrasound combined with computed tomography.

Authors:  Chanjuan Peng; Dan Yi; Ying Zhou; Jincao Yao; Bo Chen; Chen Yang; Dong Xu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Factors Associated with Malignancy in Patients with Maximal Thyroid Nodules ≥2 Cm.

Authors:  Shuai Dong; Jun Pan; Yi-Bin Shen; Li-Xian Zhu; Qing Xia; Xiao-Jun Xie; Yi-Jun Wu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.989

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.