Literature DB >> 32008239

Reasons for Premature Conclusion of Late Phase Clinical Trials: An Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov Registered Phase III Trials.

Daphne Guinn1,2, Erin E Wilhelm3, Ira Shoulson4,3,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Confirmatory phase III trials aim to provide decisive evidence about a medical product's safety and efficacy. Although these trials are planned and conducted based on accumulated knowledge, they are not without risk or uncertainty. A trial prematurely concluding contributes to great loss in both financial and human research resources.
METHODS: We categorized and evaluated trials concluded prematurely after recruitment had begun, as registered in Clinical Trials.gov between January 2013 and August 2017.
RESULTS: We found 9828 registered interventional phase III trials; of those, 320 were concluded prematurely. Many clinical trials were concluded prematurely for reasons related to reducing participant risk, such as interim stopping for safety, efficacy, or futility. Yet, 70% trials were halted for other reasons, such as insufficient recruitment (the most often cited reason) or unspecified business decisions. Of all prematurely concluded trials, 102 trials evaluated 72 different novel therapeutics; in 66.7% of these trials, the clinical development program was stopped entirely. Most of the prematurely concluded trials (78%) had not provided results to ClinicalTrials.gov at the time of this analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of the factors that influence premature conclusion could inform solutions for improving research participation and help ensure trial completion. Registering and reporting results acknowledges the voluntary contribution and consent expectations of research participants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical trial participation; drug development; recruitment; trial termination

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32008239     DOI: 10.1007/s43441-019-00050-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci        ISSN: 2168-4790            Impact factor:   1.778


  3 in total

1.  Obstacles to the reuse of study metadata in ClinicalTrials.gov.

Authors:  Laura Miron; Rafael S Gonçalves; Mark A Musen
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 6.444

2.  Quality assessment and its influencing factors of lung cancer clinical research registration: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Qiu-Mian Ye; Zheng-Guo Chen; Luan-Luan Chen; Bing Si-Tu; Yong-Yi Mai; Jing-Yao Xiao; Ya-Jie Yang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 3.005

3.  How to deal with a temporary suspension and restarting your trial: our experiences and lessons learnt.

Authors:  Lynda Constable; Tracey Davidson; Suzanne Breeman; Seonaidh Cotton; Alison McDonald; Samantha Wileman; John Norrie
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 2.279

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.