Literature DB >> 32007908

Different dynamics of new-onset electrocardiographic changes after balloon- and self-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Implications for prolonged heart rhythm monitoring.

Mathieu Coeman1, Peter Kayaert2, Tine Philipsen3, Simon Calle2, Peter Gheeraert2, Sofie Gevaert2, Jens Czapla3, Liesbeth Timmers2, Frédéric Van Heuverswyn2, Jan De Pooter2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: New onset electrocardiographic (ECG) changes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are used to assess the risk for late atrioventricular block. However, the time of ECG evaluation remains controversial. We aimed to compare the time course and dynamics of new onset ECG changes according to valve design in balloon- (BEV) and self-expandable (SEV) TAVR. METHODS AND
RESULTS: This single center study enrolled 133 consecutive TAVR patients (28.6% SEV, 71.4% BEV). Patients with pre-existent permanent pacemaker implant (PPMI), procedural death or incomplete ECG registration were excluded. Standard 12‑lead ECG was performed before the procedure, at 1, 24, 48 and 120 h and 1 month. In BEV patients, no significant PR prolongation occurred, whereas in SEV patients the PR interval prolonged significantly with 33.7 ± 22.0 ms (p < 0.001, compared to pre-TAVR) but only after 48 h after TAVR. Widening of QRS duration was comparable among both BEV and SEV patients (6.7 ± 21.5 versus 17.0 ± 26.9 ms, p = 0.061) and occurred immediately after TAVR. New-onset left bundle branch block was seen in 18.5% of BEV and 30.8% of SEV patients (p = 0.120) and occurred within 24 h after TAVR in both groups. Late PPMI (>24 h after TAVR) was higher in SEV compared to BEV patients (15.3% versus 1.5%, p = 0.008).
CONCLUSION: Self-expandable valves cause more impairment in atrioventricular conduction with a delayed time course compared to balloon expandable valves. This might explain the higher pacemaker need beyond 24 h after TAVR. Our findings suggest that patients with self-expandable valves require at least 48 h ECG monitoring post TAVR.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conduction disturbances; Electrocardiogram (ECG); Left bundle branch block (LBBB); Pacemaker; Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32007908     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electrocardiol        ISSN: 0022-0736            Impact factor:   1.438


  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of the 2021 European Society of Cardiology guidelines in pre-existing right bundle branch block patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a balloon-expandable valve.

Authors:  Toshiaki Isogai; Iryna Dykun; Ankit Agrawal; Shashank Shekhar; Khaldoun G Tarakji; Oussama M Wazni; Ankur Kalra; Amar Krishnaswamy; Grant W Reed; Samir R Kapadia; Rishi Puri
Journal:  Eur Heart J Open       Date:  2022-03-11

2.  Yield of the electrophysiological study in patients with new-onset left bundle branch block after transcathether aortic valve replacement: The PR interval matters.

Authors:  Mattia Pagnoni; David Meier; Adrian Luca; Stephane Fournier; Farhang Aminfar; Pascale Gentil; Christelle Haddad; Giulia Domenichini; Mathieu Lebloa; Claudia Herrera-Siklody; Stephane Cook; Jean-Jacques Goy; Christan Roguelov; Grégoire Girod; Vladimir Rubimbura; Marion Dupré; Eric Eeckhout; Etienne Pruvot; Olivier Muller; Patrizio Pascale
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.