Literature DB >> 32007793

Diagnostic accuracy and cut-off of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in caesarean scar pregnancy.

Haiying Li1, Xinxiu Liu1, Lijun Xie1, Zhen Ye1, Ling Gan2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and to search for cut-offs in caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) patients for making quantitative diagnoses. STUDY
DESIGN: Thirty patients in the first trimester of pregnancy were enrolled in our study. They were suspected as being at risk of caesarean scar pregnancy by conventional ultrasound and insisted on abortions. Transvaginal ultrasonography (TVU) and CEUS were performed, and parameters were analysed on the time-intensity curve (TIC). Laparotomy, laparoscopy, hysteroscopy or curettage under the guidance of ultrasound were performed, and pathological finding of villi in the uterine scar is the gold standard for a diagnosis of CSP. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was used to estimate the probability of the correct prediction of CSP.
RESULTS: CSP was diagnosed in 27 patients: pathological diagnosis revealed villus tissue in the scar. The peak intensity ratios of caesarean scar to myometrium have the overall best diagnostic performances (AUC: 0.877, 95 % CI: 0.74-1.00). Using a cut-off value of 1.08 for the peak intensity ratio of caesarean scar to myometrium, the diagnosis sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for CSP were 77.8, 100, 100, and 81.8 %, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: CEUS offers good diagnostic performance, and the peak intensity ratio of caesarean scar to myometrium can be used as a quantitative index to diagnose CSP accurately.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caesarean scar pregnancy; Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Diagnostic accuracy

Year:  2020        PMID: 32007793     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.01.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  4 in total

1.  Application of laparoscopic internal iliac artery temporary occlusion and uterine repair combined with hysteroscopic aspiration in type III cesarean scar pregnancy.

Authors:  Xianghui Su; Miner Yang; Zhao Na; Canliang Wen; Meiling Liu; Chunfang Cai; Zhuohui Zhong; Bingqian Zhou; Xiang Tang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  The diagnostic value of 3.0T MRI in cesarean scar pregnancy.

Authors:  Shuning Guo; Haitao Wang; Xiuying Yu; Yang Yu; Chunguo Wang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.940

3.  Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Assessing Abdominal Conditions in Pregnancy.

Authors:  Thomas Geyer; Johannes Rübenthaler; Matthias F Froelich; Laura Sabel; Constantin Marschner; Vincent Schwarze; Dirk-André Clevert
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 2.430

4.  Uterine Artery Embolization Combined with Subsequent Suction Evacuation as Low-Risk Treatment for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.

Authors:  Roxana Bohiltea; Ionita Ducu; Bianca Mihai; Ana-Maria Iordache; Bogdan Dorobat; Emilia Maria Vladareanu; Stefan-Marian Iordache; Alexia-Teodora Bohiltea; Nicolae Bacalbasa; Cristiana Eugenia Ana Grigorescu; Valentin Varlas
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.