Edmond S Chan1, Chitra Dinakar2, Erika Gonzales-Reyes3, Todd D Green4, Ruchi Gupta5, Douglas Jones6, Julie Wang7, Tonya Winders8, Matthew Greenhawt9. 1. BC Children's Hospital, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. 2. Stanford University, Stanford, California. 3. South Texas Allergy & Asthma Medical Professionals, San Antonio, Texas. 4. UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; DBV Technologies, Montrouge, France. 5. Center for Food Allergy and Asthma Research, Northwestern Medicine Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Illinois. 6. Tanner Clinic, Layton, Utah. 7. The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York. 8. Allergy & Asthma Network, Vienna, Virginia. 9. Section of Allergy/Immunology, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado. Electronic address: Matthew.Greenhawt@childrenscolorado.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Peanut allergy is a potentially severe and lifelong allergy, with few effective treatments or preventive measures. OBJECTIVE: To convene an expert panel of allergists, pediatricians, and advocates to discuss and highlight unmet needs in the prevention and management of peanut allergies. METHODS: Literature searches of PubMed were performed. The panel evaluated published data on the prevention of peanut allergy, treatment of existing peanut allergy, and management of reactions after unintentional peanut exposures. RESULTS: The following key unmet needs in the prevention and management of peanut allergy were identified: (1) enhancing and optimizing implementation of early peanut introduction as a means of preventing the development of peanut allergy, (2) developing knowledge translation strategies regarding the safety and efficacy data for current and emerging immunotherapies for peanut-allergic children to support their use in clinical practice, and (3) promoting understanding of true exposure risk in allergic individuals and ensuring access to epinephrine for unintentional exposures that provoke severe reactions. Practitioners should help educate caregivers about the actual risks associated with peanut allergy and its prevention and management so that treatment decisions can be evidence based rather than fear based. Support tools are needed to help address caregiver goals, expectations, and psychological barriers, as well as identify facilitators for prevention and treatment strategies. CONCLUSION: There are significant unmet needs in our understanding of peanut allergy; addressing these needs will help to enhance understanding of how to most effectively prevent and treat peanut allergy, as well as educate the food-allergic and nonallergic community regarding current evidence-based practices.
BACKGROUND:Peanutallergy is a potentially severe and lifelong allergy, with few effective treatments or preventive measures. OBJECTIVE: To convene an expert panel of allergists, pediatricians, and advocates to discuss and highlight unmet needs in the prevention and management of peanutallergies. METHODS: Literature searches of PubMed were performed. The panel evaluated published data on the prevention of peanutallergy, treatment of existing peanutallergy, and management of reactions after unintentional peanut exposures. RESULTS: The following key unmet needs in the prevention and management of peanutallergy were identified: (1) enhancing and optimizing implementation of early peanut introduction as a means of preventing the development of peanutallergy, (2) developing knowledge translation strategies regarding the safety and efficacy data for current and emerging immunotherapies for peanut-allergicchildren to support their use in clinical practice, and (3) promoting understanding of true exposure risk in allergic individuals and ensuring access to epinephrine for unintentional exposures that provoke severe reactions. Practitioners should help educate caregivers about the actual risks associated with peanutallergy and its prevention and management so that treatment decisions can be evidence based rather than fear based. Support tools are needed to help address caregiver goals, expectations, and psychological barriers, as well as identify facilitators for prevention and treatment strategies. CONCLUSION: There are significant unmet needs in our understanding of peanutallergy; addressing these needs will help to enhance understanding of how to most effectively prevent and treat peanutallergy, as well as educate the food-allergic and nonallergic community regarding current evidence-based practices.
Authors: Rebecca Czolk; Julia Klueber; Martin Sørensen; Paul Wilmes; Françoise Codreanu-Morel; Per Stahl Skov; Christiane Hilger; Carsten Bindslev-Jensen; Markus Ollert; Annette Kuehn Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2021-01-28 Impact factor: 7.561