Literature DB >> 32006695

EUCAST evaluation of 21 brands of Mueller-Hinton dehydrated media for disc diffusion testing.

J Åhman1, E Matuschek2, G Kahlmeter2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar is recommended by EUCAST and CLSI for disc diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Using EUCAST methodology, we evaluated the performance of 21 internationally available brands of dehydrated MH agar from 17 manufacturers.
METHODS: MH plates were prepared in-house and evaluated against four quality control (QC) strains tested in triplicate, using EUCAST disc diffusion methodology. This resulted in 30 disc-QC strain combinations and 90 readings per MH brand. All brands were tested blindly and in parallel. Results were evaluated against targets and ranges in the EUCAST QC tables. The agar depth, pH and concentration of five cations were measured for all brands.
RESULTS: Six brands of MH agar (Bio-Rad, Biolife, Oxoid, Sigma MH 2, BD BBL MH II and CRITERION) demonstrated excellent performance, with ≥99% of zone diameter readings within QC ranges and ≥70% on target ±1 mm. The poorest performance was seen for Biolab and Merck MH, with 10% (9/90) and 23% (21/90) of readings outside the QC ranges, respectively. Of all readings, 4.9% (93/1890) were out of range, mainly related to trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole (n = 25), aminoglycosides (n = 25) and fluoroquinolones (n = 15). The cation content differed considerably between the agars, and for four brands pH values were outside the acceptable range 7.2-7.4. DISCUSSIONS: This study evaluated the performance and content of 21 brands of MH dehydrated media. Six brands showed excellent performance with all investigated antimicrobial classes. Others exhibited problems with one or more classes of agents. This could partly be explained by differences in concentration of specific chemical components and pH.
Copyright © 2020 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agar depth; Antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Cation content; Media manufacturers; Mueller–Hinton agar; Quality control; Thymidine; pH

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32006695     DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.01.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  4 in total

Review 1.  A Critical Review of the Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Activities of Green-Synthesized Plant-Based Metallic Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Miryam M Luzala; Claude K Muanga; Joseph Kyana; Justin B Safari; Eunice N Zola; Grégoire V Mbusa; Yannick B Nuapia; Jean-Marie I Liesse; Christian I Nkanga; Rui W M Krause; Aistė Balčiūnaitienė; Patrick B Memvanga
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 5.719

2.  Comment on Mitteregger et al. A Variant Carbapenem Inactivation Method (CIM) for Acinetobacter baumannii Group with Shortened Time-to-Result: rCIM-A. Pathogens 2022, 11, 482.

Authors:  Andrei-Alexandru Muntean; Madalina-Maria Muntean; Saoussen Oueslati; Remy Bonnin; Thierry Naas; Mircea Ioan Popa
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2022-07-01

3.  EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) in blood cultures: validation in 55 European laboratories.

Authors:  Anna Åkerlund; Emma Jonasson; Erika Matuschek; Lena Serrander; Martin Sundqvist; Gunnar Kahlmeter
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 4.  Challenges to antimicrobial susceptibility testing of plant-derived polyphenolic compounds.

Authors:  Marina Bubonja-Šonje; Samira Knežević; Maja Abram
Journal:  Arh Hig Rada Toksikol       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 2.078

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.