Literature DB >> 32006169

Quantitative lobar pulmonary perfusion assessment on dual-energy CT pulmonary angiography: applications in pulmonary embolism.

Ramandeep Singh1,2, Ryan Zipan Nie3,4, Fatemeh Homayounieh3,4, Bernhard Schmidt5, Thomas Flohr5, Mannudeep K Kalra3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess quantitative lobar pulmonary perfusion on DECT-PA in patients with and without pulmonary embolism (PE).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our retrospective study included 88 adult patients (mean age 56 ± 19 years; 38 men, 50 women) who underwent DECT-PA (40 PE present; 48 PE absent) on a 384-slice, third-generation, dual-source CT. All DECT-PA examinations were reviewed to record the presence and location of occlusive and non-occlusive PE. Transverse thin (1 mm) DECT images (80/150 kV) were de-identified and exported offline for processing on a stand-alone deep learning-based prototype for automatic lung lobe segmentation and to obtain the mean attenuation numbers (in HU), contrast amount (in mg), and normalized iodine concentration per lung and lobe. The zonal volumes and mean enhancement were obtained from the Lung Analysis™ application. Data were analyzed with receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and analysis of variance (ANOVA).
RESULTS: The automatic lung lobe segmentation was accurate in all DECT-PA (88; 100%). Both lobar and zonal perfusions were significantly lower in patients with PE compared with those without PE (p < 0.0001). The mean attenuation numbers, contrast amounts, and normalized iodine concentrations in different lobes were significantly lower in the patients with PE compared with those in the patients without PE (AUC 0.70-0.78; p < 0.0001). Patients with occlusive PE had significantly lower quantitative perfusion compared with those without occlusive PE (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The deep learning-based prototype enables accurate lung lobe segmentation and assessment of quantitative lobar perfusion from DECT-PA. KEY POINTS: • Deep learning-based prototype enables accurate lung lobe segmentation and assessment of quantitative lobar perfusion from DECT-PA. • Quantitative lobar perfusion parameters (AUC up to 0.78) have a higher predicting presence of PE on DECT-PA examinations compared with the zonal perfusion parameters (AUC up to 0.72). • The lobar-normalized iodine concentration has the highest AUC for both presence of PE and for differentiating occlusive and non-occlusive PE.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep learning; Embolism, pulmonary; Hypertension, pulmonary; Multidetector-row computed tomography; Perfusion

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32006169     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06607-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  4 in total

Review 1.  Dual energy CT in clinical routine: how it works and how it adds value.

Authors:  Aaron D Sodickson; Abhishek Keraliya; Bryan Czakowski; Andrew Primak; Jeremy Wortman; Jennifer W Uyeda
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2020-06-01

2.  Lobar pulmonary perfusion quantification with dual-energy CT angiography: Interlobar variability and relationship with regional clot burden in pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Hye Ju Lee; Mark Wanderley; Vivian Cardinal da Silva Rubin; Ana Clara Tude Rodrigues; Amanda Rocha Diniz; Jose Rodrigues Parga; Marcelo Britto Passos Amato
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2022-06-08

3.  AI Lung Segmentation and Perfusion Analysis of Dual-Energy CT Can Help to Distinguish COVID-19 Infiltrates from Visually Similar Immunotherapy-Related Pneumonitis Findings and Can Optimize Radiological Workflows.

Authors:  Andreas S Brendlin; Markus Mader; Sebastian Faby; Bernhard Schmidt; Ahmed E Othman; Sebastian Gassenmaier; Konstantin Nikolaou; Saif Afat
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2021-12-23

4.  Depiction of mosaic perfusion in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) on C-arm computed tomography compared to computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA).

Authors:  Sabine K Maschke; Thomas Werncke; Cornelia L A Dewald; Lena S Becker; Timo C Meine; Karen M Olsson; Marius M Hoeper; Frank K Wacker; Bernhard C Meyer; Jan B Hinrichs
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.