Literature DB >> 32006065

Air contrast enema reduction of single and recurrent ileocolic intussusceptions in children: patterns, management and outcomes.

Grace Mang Yuet Ma1, Craig Lillehei2, Michael J Callahan3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus as to when surgical intervention should be considered for recurrent ileocolic intussusceptions in a stable patient after previous successful air contrast enema.
OBJECTIVE: To review the patterns of ileocolic intussusceptions, air contrast enema success rates, and pathologic lead point rates in patients with and without recurrence to evaluate whether treatment outcomes depend on the number and timing between episodes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 683 children with air contrast enema performed for ileocolic intussusception between January 2000 and May 2018. Recurrent intussusceptions were separated into mutually exclusive categories: short-term only (≤7 days between episodes) and long-term (>7 days between episodes) intussusceptions. Long-term recurrences included both long-term only and long- and short-term intussusceptions.
RESULTS: Of the 683 patients, 606 (89%) had at least 1 successful air contrast enema. Of the 606, 115 (19%) had recurrent intussusceptions after successful reduction. The air contrast enema success rate for a single intussusception was 86% (491/568) and for recurrent intussusceptions was 96% (110/115) (P=0.004). Single and recurrent intussusceptions had similar pathologic lead point rates (3.5% vs. 4.3%; P=0.593). Short-term and long-term recurrences did not differ in air contrast enema success rates (96% vs. 95%). Long-term recurrences had higher pathologic lead point rate compared to short-term only (13% vs. 0%; P=0.003). Of short-term recurrences, 99% (76/77) were ≤5 intussusceptions; 92% had successful air contrast enema without surgery.
CONCLUSION: The majority of recurrent intussusceptions were successfully treated by air contrast enema. Short-term recurrences have lower pathologic lead point rates, suggesting that a higher surgical threshold may be plausible relative to long-term recurrences. In the appropriate clinical context, repeat air contrast enemas are a safe option for short-term recurrences, which can be attempted at least five times, potentially precluding the need for surgical intervention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air contrast enema; Children; Colon; Infants; Intussusception; Pathologic lead point; Recurrence; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32006065     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-020-04612-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  24 in total

1.  From air to barium and back to air reduction of intussusception in children.

Authors:  Mervyn D Cohen
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2001-11-16

2.  Management of recurrent intussusception: nonoperative or operative reduction?

Authors:  Rangsan Niramis; Sukawat Watanatittan; Anchalee Kruatrachue; Maitree Anuntkosol; Veera Buranakitjaroen; Tongkao Rattanasuwan; Lawan Wongtapradit; Achariya Tongsin
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 3.  Ultrasound guided intussusception reduction: are we there yet?

Authors:  Geetika Khanna; Kimberly Applegate
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb

4.  Intussusception reduction: Effect of air vs. liquid enema on radiation dose.

Authors:  Summer L Kaplan; Dennise Magill; Marc A Felice; J Christopher Edgar; Sudha A Anupindi; Xiaowei Zhu
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-06-03

5.  The Frequency of Postreduction Interventions After Successful Enema Reduction of Intussusception.

Authors:  Elisabeth M Lessenich; Amir A Kimia; Katherine Mandeville; Joyce Li; Assaf Landschaft; Andy Tsai; Richard G Bachur
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  The leadpoint in intussusception.

Authors:  N T Ong; S W Beasley
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 7.  Recurrence rates after intussusception enema reduction: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matthew P Gray; Shun-Hwa Li; Raymond G Hoffmann; Marc H Gorelick
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Intussusception in infants and children. An analysis of 300 cases.

Authors:  C D BENSON; J R LLOYD; H FISCHER
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1963-05

9.  Recurrent Intussusception: when Should Surgical Intervention be performed?

Authors:  Wei-Lun Hsu; Hung-Chang Lee; Chun-Yan Yeung; Wai-Tao Chan; Chuen-Bin Jiang; Jin-Cherng Sheu; Nein-Lu Wang; Shin-Lin Shih
Journal:  Pediatr Neonatol       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 2.083

10.  Meta-analysis of Air Versus Liquid Enema for Intussusception Reduction in Children.

Authors:  Gelareh Sadigh; Kelly H Zou; Seyed Amirhossein Razavi; Ramsha Khan; Kimberly E Applegate
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  6 in total

1.  Fluoroscopic criteria for on-site evaluation of failed intussusception reduction during air enema technique.

Authors:  Tae Yeon Jeon; Sung-Hoon Moon; Hae Won Kim; Kyunga Kim; So-Young Yoo; Yon Ho Choe; Sanghoon Lee; Jeong-Meen Seo; Ji Hye Kim
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-07

2.  Nationwide Population-Based Epidemiologic Study on Childhood Intussusception in South Korea: Emphasis on Treatment and Outcomes.

Authors:  Eun Hye Lee; Hye Ran Yang
Journal:  Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr       Date:  2020-07-03

3.  Effect of manipulative reduction combined with air enema on intestinal mucosal immune function in children with intussusception.

Authors:  Yang Li; Han-Liang Jiao; Yu-Kun Bai; Ping Wang
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

4.  The impact of social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic on rates of pediatric idiopathic intussusception.

Authors:  Atsuhiko Handa; Michael J Callahan; Kosuke Kawai; Andy Tsai
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-10-09

5.  Process Management of Intussusception in Children: A Retrospective Analysis in China.

Authors:  Zhihuan Sun; Guoxin Song; Dandan Lian; Qingsong Zhang; Lei Dong
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 1.602

6.  [The Effect of COVID-19 on Pediatric Intussusception: A Retrospective Study of a Single Center in South Korea with 10-Year Experience].

Authors:  Yeo Jin Yoo; Bo-Kyung Je; Ga Young Choi; Jee Hyun Lee; Sunkyu Choi; Ji Young Lee
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2022-02-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.