Literature DB >> 3200596

Patient-controlled analgesia: a randomized, prospective comparison between two commercially available PCA pumps and conventional analgesic therapy for postoperative pain.

Bernice R Hecker1, Leonard Albert.   

Abstract

Two pumps, 'PA' and 'PB,' with different drug delivery characteristics were available at the time of this study for patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). PB purportedly produces a 'placebo effect' by emitting an audible signal whenever the patient depresses the trigger button. PA emits an audible signal only when the drug is successfully administered into the patient's intravenous line. In a prospective, randomized Latin squares cross-over study, the 2 pumps and conventional therapy were compared for efficacy and cost. Patients in both pump groups used less drug and perceived less pain than those on conventional therapy. However, statistically less anxiety and greater pain relief and patient and nursing satisfaction were reported with PA only. Daily cost including drug, pharmacy and nursing time, pump rental was 33%, PA, versus 23%, PB, more than conventional therapy. Purchase and amortization of the pumps decreases the cost. We conclude that PCA provides superior pain management at minimal additional cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3200596     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90283-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  9 in total

Review 1.  Economic considerations in pain management.

Authors:  S A Schug; R G Large
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  A computer-based system for controlling plasma opioid concentration according to patient need for analgesia.

Authors:  H F Hill; R C Jacobson; B A Coda; A M Mackie
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Cost considerations in patient-controlled analgesia.

Authors:  A Jacox; D B Carr; D M Mahrenholz; B M Ferrell
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Reduction of postoperative morbidity following patient-controlled morphine.

Authors:  T J Wasylak; F V Abbott; M J English; M E Jeans
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  A comparison of the effect of epidural patient-controlled analgesia with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia on pain control after posterior lumbar instrumented fusion.

Authors:  Sang Hoon Lee; Kyung Hyun Kim; Seong-Mee Cheong; Sumi Kim; Mirang Kooh; Dong Kyu Chin
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2011-09-30

6.  [Cost minimization analysis in postoperative pain management : economic efficiency and effectiveness of two infusion pump systems].

Authors:  A-K Bräscher; J Blunk; S Söhle; R E Feldmann; M Bauer; J Benrath
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 7.  Common emergencies in cancer medicine: cardiovascular and neurologic syndromes.

Authors:  C R Thomas; E A Edmondson
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 8.  Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia in the elderly: risks and benefits of epidural versus intravenous administration.

Authors:  Claude Mann; Yvan Pouzeratte; Jean-Jacques Eledjam
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  Comparison between patient-controlled analgesia and intramuscular meperidine after thoracotomy.

Authors:  A Boulanger; M Choinière; D Roy; B Bouré; D Chartrand; R Choquette; P Rousseau
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.063

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.