Literature DB >> 32005676

Late onset of new conduction disturbances requiring permanent pacemaker implantation following TAVI.

Nynke H M Kooistra1, Martijn S van Mourik2, Ramón Rodríguez-Olivares3, Alexander H Maass4, Vincent J Nijenhuis5, Rik van der Werf4, Jurrien M Ten Berg5, Adriaan O Kraaijeveld1, Jan Baan2, Michiel Voskuil1, M Marije Vis2, Pieter R Stella6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The timing of onset and associated predictors of late new conduction disturbances (CDs) leading to permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are still unknown, however, essential for an early and safe discharge. This study aimed to investigate the timing of onset and associated predictors of late onset CDs in patients requiring PPI (LCP) following TAVI. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We performed retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from five large volume centres in Europe. Post-TAVI electrocardiograms and telemetry data were evaluated in patients with a PPI post-TAVI to identify the onset of new advanced CDs. Early onset CDs were defined as within 48 hours after procedure, and late onset CDs as after 48 hours. A total of 2804 patients were included for analysis. The PPI rate was 12%, of which 18% was due to late onset CDs (>48 hours). Independent predictors for LCP were pre-existing non-specific intraventricular conduction delay, pre-existing right bundle branch block, self-expandable valves and predilation. At least one of these risk factors was present in 98% of patients with LCP. Patients with a balloon-expandable valve without predilation did not develop CDs requiring PPI after 48 hours.
CONCLUSIONS: Safe early discharge might be feasible in patients without CDs in the first 48 hours after TAVI if no risk factors for LCP are present. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic stenosis; transcatheter valve interventions; valvular heart disease

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32005676     DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  4 in total

1.  Pacemaker dependency after transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared to surgical aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  You Mi Hwang; Jun Kim; Gi Byoung Nam; Kee Joon Choi; Duk-Woo Park; Do-Yoon Kang; Seung-Jung Park; Seo Young Park
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 2.  Intraventricular Conduction Disturbances After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Authors:  Shu-I Lin; Mizuki Miura; Ana Paula Tagliari; Ying-Hsian Lee; Shinichi Shirai; Rishi Puri; Francesco Maisano; Maurizio Taramasso
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-29

3.  Value of Periprocedural Electrophysiology Testing During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Risk Stratification of Patients With New-Onset Left Bundle-Branch Block.

Authors:  Patrick Badertscher; Sven Knecht; Florian Spies; Chloé Auberson; Marc Salis; Raban V Jeger; Gregor Fahrni; Christoph Kaiser; Beat Schaer; Stefan Osswald; Christian Sticherling; Michael Kühne
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 6.106

4.  Risk Stratification for Pacemaker Implantation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients with Right Bundle Branch Block.

Authors:  Simon Schoechlin; Martin Eichenlaub; Björn Müller-Edenborn; Franz-Josef Neumann; Thomas Arentz; Dirk Westermann; Amir Jadidi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 4.964

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.