Literature DB >> 32004660

Prognostic role of EEG identical bursts in patients after cardiac arrest: Multimodal correlation.

Giuseppina Barbella1, Jan Novy2, Pedro Marques-Vidal3, Mauro Oddo4, Andrea O Rossetti5.   

Abstract

AIMS: EEG burst-suppression (BS) heralds poor outcome after cardiac arrest (CA). Within this pattern, identical bursts (IB) have been suggested to be absolutely specific, in isolation. We assessed IB prevalence and their added predictive value for poor outcome in a multimodal prognostic approach.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a registry of comatose adults with CA (April 2011-February 2019), undergoing EEG at 5-36 h and 36-72 h. SB and IB were visually assessed. Cerebral Performance Categories (CPC) at 3 months were dichotomized as "good" (CPC 1-2), or "poor" (CPC 3-5). Sensitivity, specificity, positive, negative predictive values of BS and IB for poor outcome were calculated. A multimodal prognostic score was created assigning one point each to unreactive and epileptiform EEG, pupillary light reflex and SSEPs absence, NSE > 75 μg/l. In a second score, IB were added; predictive performances were compared using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves.
RESULTS: Of 522 patients, 147 (28%) had BS in any EEG (10 [7%] had good outcome and 129 [88%] died). Of them, 53/147 (36%, 10% of total) showed IB, 47/53 (89%) of which within 36 h. IB were 100% specific for poor outcome, and associated with higher serum NSE than BS. However, there was no significant difference between the scores with and without IB for CPC 3-5 (p = 0.116).
CONCLUSION: IB occur in 10% of patients after CA. In our multimodal context, IB, albeit being very specific for poor outcome, seem redundant with other predictors.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Burst-suppression; Coma; EEG; Outcome; Postanoxic

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32004660     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  5 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac arrest: An interdisciplinary scoping review of clinical literature from 2020.

Authors:  Travis W Murphy; Scott A Cohen; Charles W Hwang; K Leslie Avery; Meenakshi P Balakrishnan; Ramani Balu; Muhammad Abdul Baker Chowdhury; David B Crabb; Yasmeen Elmelige; Carolina B Maciel; Sarah S Gul; Francis Han; Torben K Becker
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2022-07-14

Review 2.  Enhancing cardiac arrest survival with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: insights into the process of death.

Authors:  Tom P Aufderheide; Rajat Kalra; Marinos Kosmopoulos; Jason A Bartos; Demetris Yannopoulos
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Awakening from post anoxic coma with burst suppression with identical bursts.

Authors:  Patrick J Coppler; Amanda E Kusztos; Mark Andreae; Brad W Butcher; Ankur Doshi; Maria E Baldwin; Niravkumar Barot; James F Castellano; Joanna S Fong-Isariyawongse; Alexandra Urban; Clifton W Callaway; Alexis Steinberg; Jonathan Elmer
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2021-07-30

Review 4.  Revisiting EEG as part of the multidisciplinary approach to post-cardiac arrest care and prognostication: A review.

Authors:  Jay Bronder; Sung-Min Cho; Romergryko G Geocadin; Eva Katharina Ritzl
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2021-12-16

Review 5.  Critical care EEG standardized nomenclature in clinical practice: Strengths, limitations, and outlook on the example of prognostication after cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Pia De Stefano; Margitta Seeck; Andrea O Rossetti
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2021-04-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.