Changgui Shi1, Yanhai Xi1, Bin Sun1, Hailong He1, Jiankun Wen1, Yushan Ruan2, Xiaojian Ye1. 1. Department of Spine Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China. 2. Department of Spine Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dali University, Yunnan, China.
Abstract
Purpose: Cases of allergy to large surgical implants have been reported. However, few studies have reported allergy to small titanium-containing implants (e.g. Zero-P device). Methods: We reported the case of a 51-year old male patient who underwent the anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedure using a Zero-P device and exhibited allergic symptoms 1 month after the surgery. Results: The allergic symptoms included intermittent tingling and itches in the throat induced by speaking. Systemic rashes over the skin surface and congestion of the eyeball, and dysphagia were also present. Anti-allergic treatment did not resolve the symptoms. Patch tests revealed negative reactions to the rested reagents including titanium. Radiographic results showed solid bone fusion and no signs of chronic inflammation or hypotoxic infection in the surrounding tissues. Upon the patient's request, we removed the titanium screws and plate of the Zero-P device. No allergic reactions were observed after the surgery and at a 6-month follow-up.Conclusions: Even with a small implant such as the Zero-P device, allergy to titanium may still occur. This case demonstrated the need to screen for the presence of allergy to metals including titanium before the surgery.
Purpose: Cases of allergy to large surgical implants have been reported. However, few studies have reported allergy to small titanium-containing implants (e.g. Zero-P device). Methods: We reported the case of a 51-year old male patient who underwent the anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedure using a Zero-P device and exhibited allergic symptoms 1 month after the surgery. Results: The allergic symptoms included intermittent tingling and itches in the throat induced by speaking. Systemic rashes over the skin surface and congestion of the eyeball, and dysphagia were also present. Anti-allergic treatment did not resolve the symptoms. Patch tests revealed negative reactions to the rested reagents including titanium. Radiographic results showed solid bone fusion and no signs of chronic inflammation or hypotoxic infection in the surrounding tissues. Upon the patient's request, we removed the titanium screws and plate of the Zero-P device. No allergic reactions were observed after the surgery and at a 6-month follow-up.Conclusions: Even with a small implant such as the Zero-P device, allergy to titanium may still occur. This case demonstrated the need to screen for the presence of allergy to metals including titanium before the surgery.
Authors: David J Mazur-Hart; Erik W Larson; Nasser K Yaghi; Aaron M Halfpenny; David R Pettersson; David A Yam Journal: Radiol Case Rep Date: 2022-03-07