Literature DB >> 32002615

Individual differences in working memory efficiency modulate proactive interference after sleep deprivation.

Laura Riontino1,2, Corrado Cavallero3.   

Abstract

Whether and how sleep loss affects executive functioning are still under debate. In this study, we examined the role of individual differences in determining the levels of working memory (WM) efficiency and proactive interference (PI) after sleep deprivation. Fifty-two participants performed a test battery included a modified Sternberg task and the Jonides' 2-back task under two sleep conditions: baseline (BL, a night of regular sleep), and total sleep deprivation (SD, 24 h of wakefulness). In general, we replicated Tucker and colleagues' (2010) results. However, when we divided the subjects into two groups according to WM efficiency after SD, participants that showed a greater efficiency were more susceptible to PI, while those with lower WM efficiency showed a level of resistance to PI similar to BL. These results indicate that resistance to PI after SD is dependent on WM efficiency, highlighting the importance of individual differences in sleep deprivation studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32002615     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-020-01292-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  33 in total

Review 1.  Working memory: looking back and looking forward.

Authors:  Alan Baddeley
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Dissociation of cortical regions modulated by both working memory load and sleep deprivation and by sleep deprivation alone.

Authors:  Wei-Chieh Choo; Wei-Wei Lee; Vinod Venkatraman; Fwu-Shan Sheu; Michael W L Chee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Functional imaging of working memory following normal sleep and after 24 and 35 h of sleep deprivation: Correlations of fronto-parietal activation with performance.

Authors:  Michael W L Chee; Lisa Y M Chuah; Vinod Venkatraman; Wai Yen Chan; Pierre Philip; David F Dinges
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Executive function and the frontal lobes: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Julie A Alvarez; Eugene Emory
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 5.  Assessment of executive functions: review of instruments and identification of critical issues.

Authors:  Raymond C K Chan; David Shum; Timothea Toulopoulou; Eric Y H Chen
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.813

6.  The neural basis of interindividual variability in inhibitory efficiency after sleep deprivation.

Authors:  Y M Lisa Chuah; Vinod Venkatraman; David F Dinges; Michael W L Chee
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Lapsing when sleep deprived: neural activation characteristics of resistant and vulnerable individuals.

Authors:  Michael W L Chee; Jiat Chow Tan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Microstructure of frontoparietal connections predicts individual resistance to sleep deprivation.

Authors:  Jiaolong Cui; Olga Tkachenko; Hannah Gogel; Maia Kipman; Lily A Preer; Mareen Weber; Shreya C Divatia; Lauren A Demers; Elizabeth A Olson; Jennifer L Buchholz; John S Bark; Isabelle M Rosso; Scott L Rauch; William D S Killgore
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research.

Authors:  D J Buysse; C F Reynolds; T H Monk; S R Berman; D J Kupfer
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.222

10.  Effects of sleep reduction on the phonological and visuospatial components of working memory.

Authors:  Jacqueline Del Angel; Juventino Cortez; Diana Juárez; Martha Guerrero; Aída García; Candelaria Ramírez; Pablo Valdez
Journal:  Sleep Sci       Date:  2015-06-26
View more
  5 in total

1.  Raw scores on subjective sleepiness, fatigue, and vigor metrics consistently define resilience and vulnerability to sleep loss.

Authors:  Courtney E Casale; Erika M Yamazaki; Tess E Brieva; Caroline A Antler; Namni Goel
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 6.313

2.  Concordance of multiple methods to define resiliency and vulnerability to sleep loss depends on Psychomotor Vigilance Test metric.

Authors:  Erika M Yamazaki; Courtney E Casale; Tess E Brieva; Caroline A Antler; Namni Goel
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 6.313

3.  Cognitive throughput and working memory raw scores consistently differentiate resilient and vulnerable groups to sleep loss.

Authors:  Tess E Brieva; Courtney E Casale; Erika M Yamazaki; Caroline A Antler; Namni Goel
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 6.313

4.  Factors associated with sleep problems and sleeping pill use in Brazilians.

Authors:  Mayonara Fabíola Silva Araújo; Talita Araújo de Souza; Arthur de Almeida Medeiros; Jane Carla de Souza; Isabelle Ribeiro Barbosa
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 5.  Genetic Markers of Differential Vulnerability to Sleep Loss in Adults.

Authors:  Courtney E Casale; Namni Goel
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 4.096

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.