| Literature DB >> 32002168 |
Raghubendra Singh Dagur1, Ke Liao1, Susmita Sil1, Fang Niu1, Zhiqiang Sun2, Yuri L Lyubchenko2, Eric S Peeples3, Guoku Hu1, Shilpa Buch1.
Abstract
Despite the efficacy of combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) in controlling human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) replication, cytotoxic viral proteins such as HIV-1 transactivator of transcription (Tat) persist in tissues such as the brain. Although HIV-1 does not infect neuronal cells, it is susceptible to viral Tat protein-mediated toxicity, leading to neuroinflammation that underlies HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND). Given the role of extracellular vesicles (EVs) in both cellular homoeostasis and under pathological conditions, we sought to investigate the alterations in the quantity of neuronal-derived EVs in the brain - as defined by the presence of cell adhesion molecule L1 (L1CAM) and to evaluate the presence of L1CAM+ EVs in the peripheral circulation of HIV-1 transgenic (HIV-1 Tg) rats. The primary goal of this study was to investigate the effect of long-term exposure of HIV-1 viral proteins on the release of neuronal EVs in the brain and their transfer in the systemic compartment. Brain and serum EVs were isolated from both wild type and HIV-1 Tg rats using differential ultracentrifugation with further purification using the Optiprep gradient method. The subpopulation of neuronal EVs was further enriched using immunoprecipitation. The current findings demonstrated increased presence of L1CAM+ neuronal-derived EVs both in the brain and serum of HIV-1 Tg rats.Entities:
Keywords: Extracellular vesicles; HIV-1; brain EVs; neuronal EVs; serum EVs
Year: 2019 PMID: 32002168 PMCID: PMC6968593 DOI: 10.1080/20013078.2019.1703249
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Extracell Vesicles ISSN: 2001-3078
Figure 1.Characterization of brain-derived EVs: (a) Extracellular vesicles (EVs) were isolated from the brain of WT rats (n = 2) by enzymatic digestion and followed by series of centrifugation. For the purification, EVs were top-loaded on a 5–40% iodixanol and ultracentrifuge at 100,000 g for 18 h. Twelve 1 mL fractions (F1–F12) were collected. (b) Size distribution of EVs for the size range 4–500 nm of F1-F12 fraction from 2 WT- rats are shown. Inset image showing EVs morphology captured from the video in zeta view. (c) The graph shows the actual concentration of each fraction (F1-F12) assessed by zeta view after adjusting for dilutions. (d) Topographic profiling of F1-F7 EVs using atomic force microscopy (AFM) under tapping mode revealed a heterogeneous population of spherical particles. (e) Western blot images show protein expression from each fraction (F1-F12) for the presence of EV-associated proteins ALIX, TSG101 and CD9 exosome marker and non-exosome marker calnexin.
Figure 2.Neuronal-derived EVs are enriched in the brain of HIV-1 transgenic rats. (a) Graph showing the concentration of pooled F1-F7 fractions obtained from the brains of WT and HIV-Tg rats (n = 4), as evaluated by zeta-view. Equal amounts of brains from WT and HIV-1 Tg rats were used as the starting material to isolate total EVs. All conditions and dilutions were kept identical in both the groups (Wt and HIV-1 Tg) for further isolation of F1-F7 EVs and for L1CAM+ EVs. * p < 0.05 by unpaired parametric student’s t-test with Welch’s correction. (b) Graph shows the actual concentration of EVs in the L1CAM+ EVs fractions obtained by immunoprecipitation of pooled F1-F7 fractions of WT and HIV-1 Tg rats (n = 3), evaluated by zeta view. (c) Size distribution of F1-F7 fractions, and (d) L1CAM+EVs was examined by nano track analysis using zeta view. Figures depict the actual concentration of EVs by adjusting for the dilution factor in the range of 50–200 nm. (e) Western blot images showing increased expression of neuronal markers (L1CAM, βIII tubulin) in L1CAM+ EVs from HIV-1 Tg rat compared to L1CAM+ EVs from WT rat (n = 5 each group). L1CAM+ EVs derived from the brains (equal weights) from each group were loaded onto the gel. Representative L1CAM+ EVs from one WT and one HIV-1 Tg rat are shown. CD9, TSG101 were used as a positive control for exosomes. (f) Brain lysate was used as input (1% of total brain lysate) and β-actin from brain lysates (input) was used as endogenous control for the brain-derived EVs. (g) Densitometry of proteins in L1CAM+EVs fractions of WT and HIV-1 Tg rats normalized with brain lysate β actin (input). Graph for L1CAM expression shows densitometry of ~55 kDa band. *p < 0.05 by multiple t-test using the Holm-Sidak method.
Figure 3.Isolation and characterization of EVs from rat serum. (a) Extracellular Vesicle (EVs) isolation and purification procedure by ultracentrifugation. EVs obtained after centrifugation at 100,000 x g were resuspended, top-loaded on a 5–40% on iodixanol (Optiprep) and ultracentrifuge at 100,000 x g for 18 h. Twelve 1 mL fractions (F1–F12) were collected. (b) Size distribution graph shows the distribution of F1-F12 EVs fractions in the size range of 4–500 nm from WT-rats (n = 2). Inset showing representative EVs morphology captured from the video in zeta view. (c) Final concentration of EVs obtained from 6 wild-type rats pooled serum (n = 2; n refers to pooled serum from 3 rats and represented by one symbol) for each fraction (F1-F12) followed by density gradient ultracentrifugation was analysed by Zeta View. (d) Atomic force microscopy (AFM) image of pooled F6-F10 fractions EVs. (e) Proteins from each fraction (F1-F12) of and F1-12 EVs were analysed by western blot for the presence of EV-associated proteins ALIX, TSG101 and CD9.
Figure 4.Neuronal EVs are enriched in the sera of transgenic rats. (a) Graph shows the concentration of EVs (F6-F10 fractions) isolated from equal amount of pooled sera from WT rats (n = 5, each n is equivalent to pooled serum of 3–4 rats) and HIV-1 Tg rats (n = 3, each n is equivalent to pooled serum of 3–4 rats). All conditions and dilutions were kept identical for both the groups (Wt and HIV-1 Tg) for further isolation of F6-F10 EVs and L1CAM+ EVs. * p < 0.05 by unpaired parametric student’s t-test with equal standard deviation. (b) Graph shows the concentration of EVs from the L1CAM+ EVs fractions using zeta view and obtained from immunoprecipitation of pooled F6-F10 fractions of Wt and HIV-1 Tg rats (n = 3, each n is equivalent to pooled serum of 3–4 rats). (c) Size distribution of F6-F10 fractions and (d) L1CAM+EVs was examined using zeta view. Figures depict the actual concentration of EVs by adjusting with the dilution factor in the range of 50–200 nm. (e) Western blot images show increased expression of neuronal markers (L1CAM, βIII Tubulin) in L1CAM+ EVs from HIV-1 Tg rats when compared to L1CAM+ EVs from WT rats. Equal amount of serum was used as the starting material to derive L1CAM+ EVs. Equal volume of EVs (40 uL) after adjusting the obtained L1CAM+ volume to equal to parent F6-F10 EVs fraction was used to load the gel. TSG 101 and CD9 were used as positive controls for exosome marker. (f) Densitometry of the proteins in relation to WT rats. Graph for L1CAM expression shows densitometry of ~55 kDa band. * p < 0.05 by unpaired parametric student’s t-test using Mann-Whitney test.